Cargando…

A/T/N: An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers

Biomarkers have become an essential component of Alzheimer disease (AD) research and because of the pervasiveness of AD pathology in the elderly, the same biomarkers are used in cognitive aging research. A number of current issues suggest that an unbiased descriptive classification scheme for these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jack, Clifford R., Bennett, David A., Blennow, Kaj, Carrillo, Maria C., Feldman, Howard H., Frisoni, Giovanni B., Hampel, Harald, Jagust, William J., Johnson, Keith A., Knopman, David S., Petersen, Ronald C., Scheltens, Philip, Sperling, Reisa A., Dubois, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27371494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002923
_version_ 1782445998637842432
author Jack, Clifford R.
Bennett, David A.
Blennow, Kaj
Carrillo, Maria C.
Feldman, Howard H.
Frisoni, Giovanni B.
Hampel, Harald
Jagust, William J.
Johnson, Keith A.
Knopman, David S.
Petersen, Ronald C.
Scheltens, Philip
Sperling, Reisa A.
Dubois, Bruno
author_facet Jack, Clifford R.
Bennett, David A.
Blennow, Kaj
Carrillo, Maria C.
Feldman, Howard H.
Frisoni, Giovanni B.
Hampel, Harald
Jagust, William J.
Johnson, Keith A.
Knopman, David S.
Petersen, Ronald C.
Scheltens, Philip
Sperling, Reisa A.
Dubois, Bruno
author_sort Jack, Clifford R.
collection PubMed
description Biomarkers have become an essential component of Alzheimer disease (AD) research and because of the pervasiveness of AD pathology in the elderly, the same biomarkers are used in cognitive aging research. A number of current issues suggest that an unbiased descriptive classification scheme for these biomarkers would be useful. We propose the “A/T/N” system in which 7 major AD biomarkers are divided into 3 binary categories based on the nature of the pathophysiology that each measures. “A” refers to the value of a β-amyloid biomarker (amyloid PET or CSF Aβ(42)); “T,” the value of a tau biomarker (CSF phospho tau, or tau PET); and “N,” biomarkers of neurodegeneration or neuronal injury ([(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose–PET, structural MRI, or CSF total tau). Each biomarker category is rated as positive or negative. An individual score might appear as A+/T+/N−, or A+/T−/N−, etc. The A/T/N system includes the new modality tau PET. It is agnostic to the temporal ordering of mechanisms underlying AD pathogenesis. It includes all individuals in any population regardless of the mix of biomarker findings and therefore is suited to population studies of cognitive aging. It does not specify disease labels and thus is not a diagnostic classification system. It is a descriptive system for categorizing multidomain biomarker findings at the individual person level in a format that is easy to understand and use. Given the present lack of consensus among AD specialists on terminology across the clinically normal to dementia spectrum, a biomarker classification scheme will have broadest acceptance if it is independent from any one clinically defined diagnostic scheme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4970664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49706642016-08-22 A/T/N: An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers Jack, Clifford R. Bennett, David A. Blennow, Kaj Carrillo, Maria C. Feldman, Howard H. Frisoni, Giovanni B. Hampel, Harald Jagust, William J. Johnson, Keith A. Knopman, David S. Petersen, Ronald C. Scheltens, Philip Sperling, Reisa A. Dubois, Bruno Neurology Views & Reviews Biomarkers have become an essential component of Alzheimer disease (AD) research and because of the pervasiveness of AD pathology in the elderly, the same biomarkers are used in cognitive aging research. A number of current issues suggest that an unbiased descriptive classification scheme for these biomarkers would be useful. We propose the “A/T/N” system in which 7 major AD biomarkers are divided into 3 binary categories based on the nature of the pathophysiology that each measures. “A” refers to the value of a β-amyloid biomarker (amyloid PET or CSF Aβ(42)); “T,” the value of a tau biomarker (CSF phospho tau, or tau PET); and “N,” biomarkers of neurodegeneration or neuronal injury ([(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose–PET, structural MRI, or CSF total tau). Each biomarker category is rated as positive or negative. An individual score might appear as A+/T+/N−, or A+/T−/N−, etc. The A/T/N system includes the new modality tau PET. It is agnostic to the temporal ordering of mechanisms underlying AD pathogenesis. It includes all individuals in any population regardless of the mix of biomarker findings and therefore is suited to population studies of cognitive aging. It does not specify disease labels and thus is not a diagnostic classification system. It is a descriptive system for categorizing multidomain biomarker findings at the individual person level in a format that is easy to understand and use. Given the present lack of consensus among AD specialists on terminology across the clinically normal to dementia spectrum, a biomarker classification scheme will have broadest acceptance if it is independent from any one clinically defined diagnostic scheme. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4970664/ /pubmed/27371494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002923 Text en © 2016 American Academy of Neurology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Views & Reviews
Jack, Clifford R.
Bennett, David A.
Blennow, Kaj
Carrillo, Maria C.
Feldman, Howard H.
Frisoni, Giovanni B.
Hampel, Harald
Jagust, William J.
Johnson, Keith A.
Knopman, David S.
Petersen, Ronald C.
Scheltens, Philip
Sperling, Reisa A.
Dubois, Bruno
A/T/N: An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers
title A/T/N: An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers
title_full A/T/N: An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers
title_fullStr A/T/N: An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed A/T/N: An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers
title_short A/T/N: An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers
title_sort a/t/n: an unbiased descriptive classification scheme for alzheimer disease biomarkers
topic Views & Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27371494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002923
work_keys_str_mv AT jackcliffordr atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT bennettdavida atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT blennowkaj atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT carrillomariac atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT feldmanhowardh atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT frisonigiovannib atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT hampelharald atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT jagustwilliamj atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT johnsonkeitha atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT knopmandavids atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT petersenronaldc atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT scheltensphilip atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT sperlingreisaa atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers
AT duboisbruno atnanunbiaseddescriptiveclassificationschemeforalzheimerdiseasebiomarkers