Cargando…

Reported Outcome Measures in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE: Degenerative cervical myelopathy [DCM] is a disabling and increasingly prevalent group of diseases. Heterogeneous reporting of trial outcomes limits effective inter-study comparison and optimisation of treatment. This is recognised in many fields of healthcare research. The present study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, Benjamin M., McHugh, Maire, Elgheriani, Ali, Kolias, Angelos G., Tetreault, Lindsay A., Hutchinson, Peter J. A., Fehlings, Michael G., Kotter, Mark R. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27482710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157263
_version_ 1782446010108215296
author Davies, Benjamin M.
McHugh, Maire
Elgheriani, Ali
Kolias, Angelos G.
Tetreault, Lindsay A.
Hutchinson, Peter J. A.
Fehlings, Michael G.
Kotter, Mark R. N.
author_facet Davies, Benjamin M.
McHugh, Maire
Elgheriani, Ali
Kolias, Angelos G.
Tetreault, Lindsay A.
Hutchinson, Peter J. A.
Fehlings, Michael G.
Kotter, Mark R. N.
author_sort Davies, Benjamin M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Degenerative cervical myelopathy [DCM] is a disabling and increasingly prevalent group of diseases. Heterogeneous reporting of trial outcomes limits effective inter-study comparison and optimisation of treatment. This is recognised in many fields of healthcare research. The present study aims to assess the heterogeneity of outcome reporting in DCM as the premise for the development of a standardised reporting set. METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015025497) was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Full text articles in English, with >50 patients (prospective) or >200 patients (retrospective), reporting outcomes of DCM were eligible. RESULTS: 108 studies, assessing 23,876 patients, conducted world-wide, were identified. Reported outcome themes included function (reported by 97, 90% of studies), complications (reported by 56, 52% of studies), quality of life (reported by 31, 29% of studies), pain (reported by 29, 27% of studies) and imaging (reported by 59, 55% of studies). Only 7 (6%) studies considered all of domains in a single publication. All domains showed variability in reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Significant heterogeneity exists in the reporting of outcomes in DCM. The development of a consensus minimum dataset will facilitate future research synthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4970758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49707582016-08-18 Reported Outcome Measures in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review Davies, Benjamin M. McHugh, Maire Elgheriani, Ali Kolias, Angelos G. Tetreault, Lindsay A. Hutchinson, Peter J. A. Fehlings, Michael G. Kotter, Mark R. N. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Degenerative cervical myelopathy [DCM] is a disabling and increasingly prevalent group of diseases. Heterogeneous reporting of trial outcomes limits effective inter-study comparison and optimisation of treatment. This is recognised in many fields of healthcare research. The present study aims to assess the heterogeneity of outcome reporting in DCM as the premise for the development of a standardised reporting set. METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015025497) was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Full text articles in English, with >50 patients (prospective) or >200 patients (retrospective), reporting outcomes of DCM were eligible. RESULTS: 108 studies, assessing 23,876 patients, conducted world-wide, were identified. Reported outcome themes included function (reported by 97, 90% of studies), complications (reported by 56, 52% of studies), quality of life (reported by 31, 29% of studies), pain (reported by 29, 27% of studies) and imaging (reported by 59, 55% of studies). Only 7 (6%) studies considered all of domains in a single publication. All domains showed variability in reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Significant heterogeneity exists in the reporting of outcomes in DCM. The development of a consensus minimum dataset will facilitate future research synthesis. Public Library of Science 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4970758/ /pubmed/27482710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157263 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Davies, Benjamin M.
McHugh, Maire
Elgheriani, Ali
Kolias, Angelos G.
Tetreault, Lindsay A.
Hutchinson, Peter J. A.
Fehlings, Michael G.
Kotter, Mark R. N.
Reported Outcome Measures in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review
title Reported Outcome Measures in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review
title_full Reported Outcome Measures in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Reported Outcome Measures in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Reported Outcome Measures in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review
title_short Reported Outcome Measures in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review
title_sort reported outcome measures in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27482710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157263
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesbenjaminm reportedoutcomemeasuresindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyasystematicreview
AT mchughmaire reportedoutcomemeasuresindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyasystematicreview
AT elgherianiali reportedoutcomemeasuresindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyasystematicreview
AT koliasangelosg reportedoutcomemeasuresindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyasystematicreview
AT tetreaultlindsaya reportedoutcomemeasuresindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyasystematicreview
AT hutchinsonpeterja reportedoutcomemeasuresindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyasystematicreview
AT fehlingsmichaelg reportedoutcomemeasuresindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyasystematicreview
AT kottermarkrn reportedoutcomemeasuresindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyasystematicreview