Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of MRI for diagnosis of breast cancer in non-calcified equivocal breast findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies in PubMed from 01/01/1986 until 06/15/2015. Eligible were studies applying dyna...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bennani-Baiti, Barbara, Bennani-Baiti, Nabila, Baltzer, Pascal A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27482715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160346
_version_ 1782446010588463104
author Bennani-Baiti, Barbara
Bennani-Baiti, Nabila
Baltzer, Pascal A.
author_facet Bennani-Baiti, Barbara
Bennani-Baiti, Nabila
Baltzer, Pascal A.
author_sort Bennani-Baiti, Barbara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of MRI for diagnosis of breast cancer in non-calcified equivocal breast findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies in PubMed from 01/01/1986 until 06/15/2015. Eligible were studies applying dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI as an adjunct to conventional imaging (mammography, ultrasound) to clarify equivocal findings without microcalcifications. Reference standard for MRI findings had to be established by histopathological sampling or imaging follow-up of at least 12 months. Number of true or false positives and negatives and other characteristics were extracted, and possible bias was determined using the QUADAS-2 applet. Statistical analyses included data pooling and heterogeneity testing. RESULTS: Fourteen out of 514 studies comprising 2,316 lesions met our inclusion criteria. Pooled diagnostic parameters were: sensitivity (99%, 95%-CI: 93–100%), specificity (89%, 95%-CI: 85–92%), PPV (56%, 95%-CI: 42–70%) and NPV (100%, 95%-CI: 99–100%). These estimates displayed significant heterogeneity (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Breast MRI demonstrates an excellent diagnostic performance in case of non-calcified equivocal breast findings detected in conventional imaging. However, considering the substantial heterogeneity with regard to prevalence of malignancy, problem solving criteria need to be better defined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4970763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49707632016-08-18 Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Bennani-Baiti, Barbara Bennani-Baiti, Nabila Baltzer, Pascal A. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of MRI for diagnosis of breast cancer in non-calcified equivocal breast findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies in PubMed from 01/01/1986 until 06/15/2015. Eligible were studies applying dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI as an adjunct to conventional imaging (mammography, ultrasound) to clarify equivocal findings without microcalcifications. Reference standard for MRI findings had to be established by histopathological sampling or imaging follow-up of at least 12 months. Number of true or false positives and negatives and other characteristics were extracted, and possible bias was determined using the QUADAS-2 applet. Statistical analyses included data pooling and heterogeneity testing. RESULTS: Fourteen out of 514 studies comprising 2,316 lesions met our inclusion criteria. Pooled diagnostic parameters were: sensitivity (99%, 95%-CI: 93–100%), specificity (89%, 95%-CI: 85–92%), PPV (56%, 95%-CI: 42–70%) and NPV (100%, 95%-CI: 99–100%). These estimates displayed significant heterogeneity (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Breast MRI demonstrates an excellent diagnostic performance in case of non-calcified equivocal breast findings detected in conventional imaging. However, considering the substantial heterogeneity with regard to prevalence of malignancy, problem solving criteria need to be better defined. Public Library of Science 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4970763/ /pubmed/27482715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160346 Text en © 2016 Bennani-Baiti et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bennani-Baiti, Barbara
Bennani-Baiti, Nabila
Baltzer, Pascal A.
Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort diagnostic performance of breast magnetic resonance imaging in non-calcified equivocal breast findings: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27482715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160346
work_keys_str_mv AT bennanibaitibarbara diagnosticperformanceofbreastmagneticresonanceimaginginnoncalcifiedequivocalbreastfindingsresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bennanibaitinabila diagnosticperformanceofbreastmagneticresonanceimaginginnoncalcifiedequivocalbreastfindingsresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baltzerpascala diagnosticperformanceofbreastmagneticresonanceimaginginnoncalcifiedequivocalbreastfindingsresultsfromasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis