Cargando…

Genetic variation frequencies in Wilms' tumor: A meta‐analysis and systematic review

Over the last few decades, numerous biomarkers in Wilms' tumor have been confirmed and shown variations in prevalence. Most of these studies were based on small sample sizes. We carried out a meta‐analysis of the research published from 1992 to 2015 to obtain more precise and comprehensive outc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Changkai, Dai, Rong, Li, Xuliang, Liu, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26892980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12910
_version_ 1782446021921472512
author Deng, Changkai
Dai, Rong
Li, Xuliang
Liu, Feng
author_facet Deng, Changkai
Dai, Rong
Li, Xuliang
Liu, Feng
author_sort Deng, Changkai
collection PubMed
description Over the last few decades, numerous biomarkers in Wilms' tumor have been confirmed and shown variations in prevalence. Most of these studies were based on small sample sizes. We carried out a meta‐analysis of the research published from 1992 to 2015 to obtain more precise and comprehensive outcomes for genetic tests. In the present study, 70 out of 5175 published reports were eligible for the meta‐analysis, which was carried out using Stata 12.0 software. Pooled prevalence for gene mutations WT1, WTX, CTNNB1, TP53, MYCN, DROSHA, and DGCR8 was 0.141 (0.104, 0.178), 0.147 (0.110, 0.184), 0.140 (0.100, 0.190), 0.410 (0.214, 0.605), 0.071 (0.041, 0.100), 0.082 (0.048, 0.116), and 0.036 (0.026, 0.046), respectively. Pooled prevalence of loss of heterozygosity at 1p, 11p, 11q, 16q, and 22q was 0.109 (0.084, 0.133), 0.334 (0.295, 0.373), 0.199 (0.146, 0.252), 0.151 (0.129, 0.172), and 0.148 (0.108, 0.189), respectively. Pooled prevalence of 1q and chromosome 12 gain was 0.218 (0.161, 0.275) and 0.273 (0.195, 0.350), respectively. The limited prevalence of currently known genetic alterations in Wilms' tumors indicates that significant drivers of initiation and progression remain to be discovered. Subgroup analyses indicated that ethnicity may be one of the sources of heterogeneity. However, in meta‐regression analyses, no study‐level characteristics of indicators were found to be significant. In addition, the findings of our sensitivity analysis and possible publication bias remind us to interpret results with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4970837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49708372016-09-07 Genetic variation frequencies in Wilms' tumor: A meta‐analysis and systematic review Deng, Changkai Dai, Rong Li, Xuliang Liu, Feng Cancer Sci Original Articles Over the last few decades, numerous biomarkers in Wilms' tumor have been confirmed and shown variations in prevalence. Most of these studies were based on small sample sizes. We carried out a meta‐analysis of the research published from 1992 to 2015 to obtain more precise and comprehensive outcomes for genetic tests. In the present study, 70 out of 5175 published reports were eligible for the meta‐analysis, which was carried out using Stata 12.0 software. Pooled prevalence for gene mutations WT1, WTX, CTNNB1, TP53, MYCN, DROSHA, and DGCR8 was 0.141 (0.104, 0.178), 0.147 (0.110, 0.184), 0.140 (0.100, 0.190), 0.410 (0.214, 0.605), 0.071 (0.041, 0.100), 0.082 (0.048, 0.116), and 0.036 (0.026, 0.046), respectively. Pooled prevalence of loss of heterozygosity at 1p, 11p, 11q, 16q, and 22q was 0.109 (0.084, 0.133), 0.334 (0.295, 0.373), 0.199 (0.146, 0.252), 0.151 (0.129, 0.172), and 0.148 (0.108, 0.189), respectively. Pooled prevalence of 1q and chromosome 12 gain was 0.218 (0.161, 0.275) and 0.273 (0.195, 0.350), respectively. The limited prevalence of currently known genetic alterations in Wilms' tumors indicates that significant drivers of initiation and progression remain to be discovered. Subgroup analyses indicated that ethnicity may be one of the sources of heterogeneity. However, in meta‐regression analyses, no study‐level characteristics of indicators were found to be significant. In addition, the findings of our sensitivity analysis and possible publication bias remind us to interpret results with caution. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-18 2016-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4970837/ /pubmed/26892980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12910 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Deng, Changkai
Dai, Rong
Li, Xuliang
Liu, Feng
Genetic variation frequencies in Wilms' tumor: A meta‐analysis and systematic review
title Genetic variation frequencies in Wilms' tumor: A meta‐analysis and systematic review
title_full Genetic variation frequencies in Wilms' tumor: A meta‐analysis and systematic review
title_fullStr Genetic variation frequencies in Wilms' tumor: A meta‐analysis and systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Genetic variation frequencies in Wilms' tumor: A meta‐analysis and systematic review
title_short Genetic variation frequencies in Wilms' tumor: A meta‐analysis and systematic review
title_sort genetic variation frequencies in wilms' tumor: a meta‐analysis and systematic review
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26892980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.12910
work_keys_str_mv AT dengchangkai geneticvariationfrequenciesinwilmstumorametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT dairong geneticvariationfrequenciesinwilmstumorametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT lixuliang geneticvariationfrequenciesinwilmstumorametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT liufeng geneticvariationfrequenciesinwilmstumorametaanalysisandsystematicreview