Cargando…

Molecular Scanning and Morpho-Physiological Dissection of Component Mechanism in Lens Species in Response to Aluminium Stress

Aluminium (Al) stress was imposed on 285 lentil genotypes at seedling stage under hydroponics to study its effects on morpho-physiological traits where resistant cultigens and wilds showed minimum reduction in root and shoot length and maximum root re-growth (RRG) after staining. Molecular assortmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Dharmendra, Pal, Madan, Singh, Chandan Kumar, Taunk, Jyoti, Jain, Priyanka, Chaturvedi, Ashish Kumar, Maurya, Sadhana, Karwa, Sourabh, Singh, Rajendra, Tomar, Ram Sewak Singh, Nongthombam, Rita, Chongtham, Nandini, Singh, Moirangthem Premjit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27467074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160073
_version_ 1782446022375505920
author Singh, Dharmendra
Pal, Madan
Singh, Chandan Kumar
Taunk, Jyoti
Jain, Priyanka
Chaturvedi, Ashish Kumar
Maurya, Sadhana
Karwa, Sourabh
Singh, Rajendra
Tomar, Ram Sewak Singh
Nongthombam, Rita
Chongtham, Nandini
Singh, Moirangthem Premjit
author_facet Singh, Dharmendra
Pal, Madan
Singh, Chandan Kumar
Taunk, Jyoti
Jain, Priyanka
Chaturvedi, Ashish Kumar
Maurya, Sadhana
Karwa, Sourabh
Singh, Rajendra
Tomar, Ram Sewak Singh
Nongthombam, Rita
Chongtham, Nandini
Singh, Moirangthem Premjit
author_sort Singh, Dharmendra
collection PubMed
description Aluminium (Al) stress was imposed on 285 lentil genotypes at seedling stage under hydroponics to study its effects on morpho-physiological traits where resistant cultigens and wilds showed minimum reduction in root and shoot length and maximum root re-growth (RRG) after staining. Molecular assortment based on 46 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers clustered the genotypes into 11 groups, where wilds were separated from the cultigens. Genetic diversity and polymorphism information content (PIC) varied between 0.148–0.775 and 0.140–0.739, respectively. Breeding lines which were found to be most resistant (L-7903, L-4602); sensitive cultivars (BM-4, L-4147) and wilds ILWL-185 (resistant), ILWL-436 (sensitive) were grouped into different clusters. These genotypes were also separated on the basis of population structure and Jaccard’s similarity index and analysed to study Al resistance mechanism through determination of different attributes like localization of Al and callose, lipid peroxidation, secretion of organic acids and production of antioxidant enzymes. In contrast to sensitive genotypes, in resistant ones most of the Al was localized in the epidermal cells, where its movement to apoplastic region was restricted due to release of citrate and malate. Under acidic field conditions, resistant genotypes produced maximum seed yield/plant as compared to sensitive genotypes at two different locations i.e. Imphal, Manipur, India and Basar, Arunanchal Pradesh, India during 2012–13, 2013–14 and 2014–15. These findings suggest that Al stress adaptation in lentil is through exclusion mechanism and hybridization between the contrasting genotypes from distinct clusters can help in development of resistant varieties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4970855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49708552016-08-18 Molecular Scanning and Morpho-Physiological Dissection of Component Mechanism in Lens Species in Response to Aluminium Stress Singh, Dharmendra Pal, Madan Singh, Chandan Kumar Taunk, Jyoti Jain, Priyanka Chaturvedi, Ashish Kumar Maurya, Sadhana Karwa, Sourabh Singh, Rajendra Tomar, Ram Sewak Singh Nongthombam, Rita Chongtham, Nandini Singh, Moirangthem Premjit PLoS One Research Article Aluminium (Al) stress was imposed on 285 lentil genotypes at seedling stage under hydroponics to study its effects on morpho-physiological traits where resistant cultigens and wilds showed minimum reduction in root and shoot length and maximum root re-growth (RRG) after staining. Molecular assortment based on 46 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers clustered the genotypes into 11 groups, where wilds were separated from the cultigens. Genetic diversity and polymorphism information content (PIC) varied between 0.148–0.775 and 0.140–0.739, respectively. Breeding lines which were found to be most resistant (L-7903, L-4602); sensitive cultivars (BM-4, L-4147) and wilds ILWL-185 (resistant), ILWL-436 (sensitive) were grouped into different clusters. These genotypes were also separated on the basis of population structure and Jaccard’s similarity index and analysed to study Al resistance mechanism through determination of different attributes like localization of Al and callose, lipid peroxidation, secretion of organic acids and production of antioxidant enzymes. In contrast to sensitive genotypes, in resistant ones most of the Al was localized in the epidermal cells, where its movement to apoplastic region was restricted due to release of citrate and malate. Under acidic field conditions, resistant genotypes produced maximum seed yield/plant as compared to sensitive genotypes at two different locations i.e. Imphal, Manipur, India and Basar, Arunanchal Pradesh, India during 2012–13, 2013–14 and 2014–15. These findings suggest that Al stress adaptation in lentil is through exclusion mechanism and hybridization between the contrasting genotypes from distinct clusters can help in development of resistant varieties. Public Library of Science 2016-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4970855/ /pubmed/27467074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160073 Text en © 2016 Singh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Singh, Dharmendra
Pal, Madan
Singh, Chandan Kumar
Taunk, Jyoti
Jain, Priyanka
Chaturvedi, Ashish Kumar
Maurya, Sadhana
Karwa, Sourabh
Singh, Rajendra
Tomar, Ram Sewak Singh
Nongthombam, Rita
Chongtham, Nandini
Singh, Moirangthem Premjit
Molecular Scanning and Morpho-Physiological Dissection of Component Mechanism in Lens Species in Response to Aluminium Stress
title Molecular Scanning and Morpho-Physiological Dissection of Component Mechanism in Lens Species in Response to Aluminium Stress
title_full Molecular Scanning and Morpho-Physiological Dissection of Component Mechanism in Lens Species in Response to Aluminium Stress
title_fullStr Molecular Scanning and Morpho-Physiological Dissection of Component Mechanism in Lens Species in Response to Aluminium Stress
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Scanning and Morpho-Physiological Dissection of Component Mechanism in Lens Species in Response to Aluminium Stress
title_short Molecular Scanning and Morpho-Physiological Dissection of Component Mechanism in Lens Species in Response to Aluminium Stress
title_sort molecular scanning and morpho-physiological dissection of component mechanism in lens species in response to aluminium stress
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27467074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160073
work_keys_str_mv AT singhdharmendra molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress
AT palmadan molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress
AT singhchandankumar molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress
AT taunkjyoti molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress
AT jainpriyanka molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress
AT chaturvediashishkumar molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress
AT mauryasadhana molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress
AT karwasourabh molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress
AT singhrajendra molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress
AT tomarramsewaksingh molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress
AT nongthombamrita molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress
AT chongthamnandini molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress
AT singhmoirangthempremjit molecularscanningandmorphophysiologicaldissectionofcomponentmechanisminlensspeciesinresponsetoaluminiumstress