Cargando…
A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection
PURPOSE: Fidaxomicin use in real-world clinical practice, especially for severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), is mainly based on single-center observational studies. The purpose of this pharmacoepidemiology study was to assess outcomes of patients given fidaxomicin based on episode number a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2825-x |
_version_ | 1782446026672570368 |
---|---|
author | Shah, Dhara N. Chan, Fay S. Kachru, Nandita Garcia, Krutina P. Balcer, Holly E. Dyer, April P. Emanuel, John E. Jordan, Michelle D. Lusardi, Katherine T. Naymick, Geri Polisetty, Radhika S. Sieman, Lanny Tyler, Ashley M. Johnson, Michael L. Garey, Kevin W. |
author_facet | Shah, Dhara N. Chan, Fay S. Kachru, Nandita Garcia, Krutina P. Balcer, Holly E. Dyer, April P. Emanuel, John E. Jordan, Michelle D. Lusardi, Katherine T. Naymick, Geri Polisetty, Radhika S. Sieman, Lanny Tyler, Ashley M. Johnson, Michael L. Garey, Kevin W. |
author_sort | Shah, Dhara N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Fidaxomicin use in real-world clinical practice, especially for severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), is mainly based on single-center observational studies. The purpose of this pharmacoepidemiology study was to assess outcomes of patients given fidaxomicin based on episode number and use of concomitant antibiotics. METHODS: Fidaxomicin use over time across included hospitals in the United States was assessed using a large inpatient drug utilization database. A multicenter retrospective chart review was also conducted of hospitalized patients with CDI that received fidaxomicin between 2011 and 2013. Fidaxomicin utilization and clinical outcomes were stratified by use of fidaxomicin for first or second episode (early episodes) versus greater than or equal to episodes (later episodes). RESULTS: The overall fidaxomicin use rate was 2.16 % which increased from 0.22 % in the last two quarters of 2011 to 3.16 % in the first two quarters of 2013. A total of 102 hospitalized patients that received fidaxomicin from 11 hospitals were identified in the multicenter study. Sixty-nine patients received fidaxomicin for early (68 % with severe CDI) and 33 received for later episodes. The majority of patients received other CDI therapy including 61 patients (88 %) for early episodes and 27 (82 %) for later episodes. Concomitant non-CDI antibiotics were received by 48 patients (47 %). Rates of clinical outcomes were similar regardless of CDI episode. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a slow but steady increase in fidaxomicin utilization over time; most of which was combined with other systemic antibiotics. Antimicrobial stewardship teams should provide guidance on appropriate use of fidaxomicin to optimize therapy and assess the need to continue other antibiotics during CDI treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4970984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49709842016-08-17 A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection Shah, Dhara N. Chan, Fay S. Kachru, Nandita Garcia, Krutina P. Balcer, Holly E. Dyer, April P. Emanuel, John E. Jordan, Michelle D. Lusardi, Katherine T. Naymick, Geri Polisetty, Radhika S. Sieman, Lanny Tyler, Ashley M. Johnson, Michael L. Garey, Kevin W. Springerplus Research PURPOSE: Fidaxomicin use in real-world clinical practice, especially for severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), is mainly based on single-center observational studies. The purpose of this pharmacoepidemiology study was to assess outcomes of patients given fidaxomicin based on episode number and use of concomitant antibiotics. METHODS: Fidaxomicin use over time across included hospitals in the United States was assessed using a large inpatient drug utilization database. A multicenter retrospective chart review was also conducted of hospitalized patients with CDI that received fidaxomicin between 2011 and 2013. Fidaxomicin utilization and clinical outcomes were stratified by use of fidaxomicin for first or second episode (early episodes) versus greater than or equal to episodes (later episodes). RESULTS: The overall fidaxomicin use rate was 2.16 % which increased from 0.22 % in the last two quarters of 2011 to 3.16 % in the first two quarters of 2013. A total of 102 hospitalized patients that received fidaxomicin from 11 hospitals were identified in the multicenter study. Sixty-nine patients received fidaxomicin for early (68 % with severe CDI) and 33 received for later episodes. The majority of patients received other CDI therapy including 61 patients (88 %) for early episodes and 27 (82 %) for later episodes. Concomitant non-CDI antibiotics were received by 48 patients (47 %). Rates of clinical outcomes were similar regardless of CDI episode. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a slow but steady increase in fidaxomicin utilization over time; most of which was combined with other systemic antibiotics. Antimicrobial stewardship teams should provide guidance on appropriate use of fidaxomicin to optimize therapy and assess the need to continue other antibiotics during CDI treatment. Springer International Publishing 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4970984/ /pubmed/27536508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2825-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Shah, Dhara N. Chan, Fay S. Kachru, Nandita Garcia, Krutina P. Balcer, Holly E. Dyer, April P. Emanuel, John E. Jordan, Michelle D. Lusardi, Katherine T. Naymick, Geri Polisetty, Radhika S. Sieman, Lanny Tyler, Ashley M. Johnson, Michael L. Garey, Kevin W. A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection |
title | A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection |
title_full | A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection |
title_fullStr | A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection |
title_full_unstemmed | A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection |
title_short | A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection |
title_sort | multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for clostridium difficile infection |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2825-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahdharan amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT chanfays amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT kachrunandita amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT garciakrutinap amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT balcerhollye amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT dyeraprilp amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT emanueljohne amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT jordanmichelled amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT lusardikatherinet amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT naymickgeri amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT polisettyradhikas amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT siemanlanny amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT tylerashleym amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT johnsonmichaell amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT gareykevinw amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT shahdharan multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT chanfays multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT kachrunandita multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT garciakrutinap multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT balcerhollye multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT dyeraprilp multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT emanueljohne multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT jordanmichelled multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT lusardikatherinet multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT naymickgeri multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT polisettyradhikas multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT siemanlanny multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT tylerashleym multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT johnsonmichaell multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection AT gareykevinw multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection |