Cargando…

A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection

PURPOSE: Fidaxomicin use in real-world clinical practice, especially for severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), is mainly based on single-center observational studies. The purpose of this pharmacoepidemiology study was to assess outcomes of patients given fidaxomicin based on episode number a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Dhara N., Chan, Fay S., Kachru, Nandita, Garcia, Krutina P., Balcer, Holly E., Dyer, April P., Emanuel, John E., Jordan, Michelle D., Lusardi, Katherine T., Naymick, Geri, Polisetty, Radhika S., Sieman, Lanny, Tyler, Ashley M., Johnson, Michael L., Garey, Kevin W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2825-x
_version_ 1782446026672570368
author Shah, Dhara N.
Chan, Fay S.
Kachru, Nandita
Garcia, Krutina P.
Balcer, Holly E.
Dyer, April P.
Emanuel, John E.
Jordan, Michelle D.
Lusardi, Katherine T.
Naymick, Geri
Polisetty, Radhika S.
Sieman, Lanny
Tyler, Ashley M.
Johnson, Michael L.
Garey, Kevin W.
author_facet Shah, Dhara N.
Chan, Fay S.
Kachru, Nandita
Garcia, Krutina P.
Balcer, Holly E.
Dyer, April P.
Emanuel, John E.
Jordan, Michelle D.
Lusardi, Katherine T.
Naymick, Geri
Polisetty, Radhika S.
Sieman, Lanny
Tyler, Ashley M.
Johnson, Michael L.
Garey, Kevin W.
author_sort Shah, Dhara N.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Fidaxomicin use in real-world clinical practice, especially for severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), is mainly based on single-center observational studies. The purpose of this pharmacoepidemiology study was to assess outcomes of patients given fidaxomicin based on episode number and use of concomitant antibiotics. METHODS: Fidaxomicin use over time across included hospitals in the United States was assessed using a large inpatient drug utilization database. A multicenter retrospective chart review was also conducted of hospitalized patients with CDI that received fidaxomicin between 2011 and 2013. Fidaxomicin utilization and clinical outcomes were stratified by use of fidaxomicin for first or second episode (early episodes) versus greater than or equal to episodes (later episodes). RESULTS: The overall fidaxomicin use rate was 2.16 % which increased from 0.22 % in the last two quarters of 2011 to 3.16 % in the first two quarters of 2013. A total of 102 hospitalized patients that received fidaxomicin from 11 hospitals were identified in the multicenter study. Sixty-nine patients received fidaxomicin for early (68 % with severe CDI) and 33 received for later episodes. The majority of patients received other CDI therapy including 61 patients (88 %) for early episodes and 27 (82 %) for later episodes. Concomitant non-CDI antibiotics were received by 48 patients (47 %). Rates of clinical outcomes were similar regardless of CDI episode. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a slow but steady increase in fidaxomicin utilization over time; most of which was combined with other systemic antibiotics. Antimicrobial stewardship teams should provide guidance on appropriate use of fidaxomicin to optimize therapy and assess the need to continue other antibiotics during CDI treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4970984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49709842016-08-17 A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection Shah, Dhara N. Chan, Fay S. Kachru, Nandita Garcia, Krutina P. Balcer, Holly E. Dyer, April P. Emanuel, John E. Jordan, Michelle D. Lusardi, Katherine T. Naymick, Geri Polisetty, Radhika S. Sieman, Lanny Tyler, Ashley M. Johnson, Michael L. Garey, Kevin W. Springerplus Research PURPOSE: Fidaxomicin use in real-world clinical practice, especially for severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), is mainly based on single-center observational studies. The purpose of this pharmacoepidemiology study was to assess outcomes of patients given fidaxomicin based on episode number and use of concomitant antibiotics. METHODS: Fidaxomicin use over time across included hospitals in the United States was assessed using a large inpatient drug utilization database. A multicenter retrospective chart review was also conducted of hospitalized patients with CDI that received fidaxomicin between 2011 and 2013. Fidaxomicin utilization and clinical outcomes were stratified by use of fidaxomicin for first or second episode (early episodes) versus greater than or equal to episodes (later episodes). RESULTS: The overall fidaxomicin use rate was 2.16 % which increased from 0.22 % in the last two quarters of 2011 to 3.16 % in the first two quarters of 2013. A total of 102 hospitalized patients that received fidaxomicin from 11 hospitals were identified in the multicenter study. Sixty-nine patients received fidaxomicin for early (68 % with severe CDI) and 33 received for later episodes. The majority of patients received other CDI therapy including 61 patients (88 %) for early episodes and 27 (82 %) for later episodes. Concomitant non-CDI antibiotics were received by 48 patients (47 %). Rates of clinical outcomes were similar regardless of CDI episode. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a slow but steady increase in fidaxomicin utilization over time; most of which was combined with other systemic antibiotics. Antimicrobial stewardship teams should provide guidance on appropriate use of fidaxomicin to optimize therapy and assess the need to continue other antibiotics during CDI treatment. Springer International Publishing 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4970984/ /pubmed/27536508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2825-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Shah, Dhara N.
Chan, Fay S.
Kachru, Nandita
Garcia, Krutina P.
Balcer, Holly E.
Dyer, April P.
Emanuel, John E.
Jordan, Michelle D.
Lusardi, Katherine T.
Naymick, Geri
Polisetty, Radhika S.
Sieman, Lanny
Tyler, Ashley M.
Johnson, Michael L.
Garey, Kevin W.
A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection
title A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection
title_full A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection
title_fullStr A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection
title_full_unstemmed A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection
title_short A multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridium difficile infection
title_sort multi-center study of fidaxomicin use for clostridium difficile infection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2825-x
work_keys_str_mv AT shahdharan amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT chanfays amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT kachrunandita amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT garciakrutinap amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT balcerhollye amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT dyeraprilp amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT emanueljohne amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT jordanmichelled amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT lusardikatherinet amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT naymickgeri amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT polisettyradhikas amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT siemanlanny amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT tylerashleym amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT johnsonmichaell amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT gareykevinw amulticenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT shahdharan multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT chanfays multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT kachrunandita multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT garciakrutinap multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT balcerhollye multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT dyeraprilp multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT emanueljohne multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT jordanmichelled multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT lusardikatherinet multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT naymickgeri multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT polisettyradhikas multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT siemanlanny multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT tylerashleym multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT johnsonmichaell multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT gareykevinw multicenterstudyoffidaxomicinuseforclostridiumdifficileinfection