Cargando…

Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity

The classic account of the load theory (LT) of attention suggests that increasing cognitive load leads to greater processing of task-irrelevant stimuli due to competition for limited executive resource that reduces the ability to actively maintain current processing priorities. Studies testing this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simon, Sharon S., Tusch, Erich S., Holcomb, Phillip J., Daffner, Kirk R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4971070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536226
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00380
_version_ 1782446045738827776
author Simon, Sharon S.
Tusch, Erich S.
Holcomb, Phillip J.
Daffner, Kirk R.
author_facet Simon, Sharon S.
Tusch, Erich S.
Holcomb, Phillip J.
Daffner, Kirk R.
author_sort Simon, Sharon S.
collection PubMed
description The classic account of the load theory (LT) of attention suggests that increasing cognitive load leads to greater processing of task-irrelevant stimuli due to competition for limited executive resource that reduces the ability to actively maintain current processing priorities. Studies testing this hypothesis have yielded widely divergent outcomes. The inconsistent results may, in part, be related to variability in executive capacity (EC) and task difficulty across subjects in different studies. Here, we used a cross-modal paradigm to investigate whether augmented working memory (WM) load leads to increased early distracter processing, and controlled for the potential confounders of EC and task difficulty. Twenty-three young subjects were engaged in a primary visual WM task, under high and low load conditions, while instructed to ignore irrelevant auditory stimuli. Demands of the high load condition were individually titrated to make task difficulty comparable across subjects with differing EC. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to measure neural activity in response to stimuli presented in both the task relevant modality (visual) and task-irrelevant modality (auditory). Behavioral results indicate that the load manipulation and titration procedure of the primary visual task were successful. ERPs demonstrated that in response to visual target stimuli, there was a load-related increase in the posterior slow wave, an index of sustained attention and effort. Importantly, under high load, there was a decrease of the auditory N1 in response to distracters, a marker of early auditory processing. These results suggest that increased WM load is associated with enhanced attentional engagement and protection from distraction in a cross-modal setting, even after controlling for task difficulty and EC. Our findings challenge the classic LT and offer support for alternative models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4971070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49710702016-08-17 Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity Simon, Sharon S. Tusch, Erich S. Holcomb, Phillip J. Daffner, Kirk R. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The classic account of the load theory (LT) of attention suggests that increasing cognitive load leads to greater processing of task-irrelevant stimuli due to competition for limited executive resource that reduces the ability to actively maintain current processing priorities. Studies testing this hypothesis have yielded widely divergent outcomes. The inconsistent results may, in part, be related to variability in executive capacity (EC) and task difficulty across subjects in different studies. Here, we used a cross-modal paradigm to investigate whether augmented working memory (WM) load leads to increased early distracter processing, and controlled for the potential confounders of EC and task difficulty. Twenty-three young subjects were engaged in a primary visual WM task, under high and low load conditions, while instructed to ignore irrelevant auditory stimuli. Demands of the high load condition were individually titrated to make task difficulty comparable across subjects with differing EC. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to measure neural activity in response to stimuli presented in both the task relevant modality (visual) and task-irrelevant modality (auditory). Behavioral results indicate that the load manipulation and titration procedure of the primary visual task were successful. ERPs demonstrated that in response to visual target stimuli, there was a load-related increase in the posterior slow wave, an index of sustained attention and effort. Importantly, under high load, there was a decrease of the auditory N1 in response to distracters, a marker of early auditory processing. These results suggest that increased WM load is associated with enhanced attentional engagement and protection from distraction in a cross-modal setting, even after controlling for task difficulty and EC. Our findings challenge the classic LT and offer support for alternative models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4971070/ /pubmed/27536226 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00380 Text en Copyright © 2016 Simon, Tusch, Holcomb and Daffner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Simon, Sharon S.
Tusch, Erich S.
Holcomb, Phillip J.
Daffner, Kirk R.
Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity
title Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity
title_full Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity
title_fullStr Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity
title_full_unstemmed Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity
title_short Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity
title_sort increasing working memory load reduces processing of cross-modal task-irrelevant stimuli even after controlling for task difficulty and executive capacity
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4971070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536226
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00380
work_keys_str_mv AT simonsharons increasingworkingmemoryloadreducesprocessingofcrossmodaltaskirrelevantstimulievenaftercontrollingfortaskdifficultyandexecutivecapacity
AT tuscherichs increasingworkingmemoryloadreducesprocessingofcrossmodaltaskirrelevantstimulievenaftercontrollingfortaskdifficultyandexecutivecapacity
AT holcombphillipj increasingworkingmemoryloadreducesprocessingofcrossmodaltaskirrelevantstimulievenaftercontrollingfortaskdifficultyandexecutivecapacity
AT daffnerkirkr increasingworkingmemoryloadreducesprocessingofcrossmodaltaskirrelevantstimulievenaftercontrollingfortaskdifficultyandexecutivecapacity