Cargando…

Factors associated with married women’s support of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Uganda: a population based cross–sectional study

BACKGROUND: Despite the protective effect of male circumcision (MC) against HIV in men, the acceptance of voluntary MC in priority countries for MC scale–up such as Uganda remains limited. This study examined the role of women’s sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of HIV and sexual bargainin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mati, Komi, Adegoke, Korede K., Salihu, Hamisu M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4971618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27484177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3385-2
_version_ 1782446134082404352
author Mati, Komi
Adegoke, Korede K.
Salihu, Hamisu M.
author_facet Mati, Komi
Adegoke, Korede K.
Salihu, Hamisu M.
author_sort Mati, Komi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the protective effect of male circumcision (MC) against HIV in men, the acceptance of voluntary MC in priority countries for MC scale–up such as Uganda remains limited. This study examined the role of women’s sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of HIV and sexual bargaining power as determinants of women’s support of male circumcision (MC). METHODS: Data from the Uganda AIDS Indicator Survey, 2011 were analyzed (n = 4,874). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with random intercept were conducted to identify factors that influence women’s support of MC. RESULTS: Overall, 67.0 % (n = 3,276) of the women in our sample were in support of MC but only 28.0 % had circumcised partners. Women who had the knowledge that circumcision reduces HIV risk were about 6 times as likely to support MC than women who lacked that knowledge [AOR (adjusted odds ratio) = 5.85, 95 % CI (confidence interval) = 4.83–7.10]. The two indicators of women’s sexual bargaining power (i.e., ability to negotiate condom use and ability to refuse sex) were also positively associated with support of MC. Several sociodemographic factors particularly wealth index were also positively associated with women’s support of MC. CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this study will potentially inform intervention strategies to enhance uptake of male circumcision as a strategy to reduce HIV transmission in Uganda.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4971618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49716182016-08-04 Factors associated with married women’s support of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Uganda: a population based cross–sectional study Mati, Komi Adegoke, Korede K. Salihu, Hamisu M. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the protective effect of male circumcision (MC) against HIV in men, the acceptance of voluntary MC in priority countries for MC scale–up such as Uganda remains limited. This study examined the role of women’s sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of HIV and sexual bargaining power as determinants of women’s support of male circumcision (MC). METHODS: Data from the Uganda AIDS Indicator Survey, 2011 were analyzed (n = 4,874). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with random intercept were conducted to identify factors that influence women’s support of MC. RESULTS: Overall, 67.0 % (n = 3,276) of the women in our sample were in support of MC but only 28.0 % had circumcised partners. Women who had the knowledge that circumcision reduces HIV risk were about 6 times as likely to support MC than women who lacked that knowledge [AOR (adjusted odds ratio) = 5.85, 95 % CI (confidence interval) = 4.83–7.10]. The two indicators of women’s sexual bargaining power (i.e., ability to negotiate condom use and ability to refuse sex) were also positively associated with support of MC. Several sociodemographic factors particularly wealth index were also positively associated with women’s support of MC. CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this study will potentially inform intervention strategies to enhance uptake of male circumcision as a strategy to reduce HIV transmission in Uganda. BioMed Central 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4971618/ /pubmed/27484177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3385-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mati, Komi
Adegoke, Korede K.
Salihu, Hamisu M.
Factors associated with married women’s support of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Uganda: a population based cross–sectional study
title Factors associated with married women’s support of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Uganda: a population based cross–sectional study
title_full Factors associated with married women’s support of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Uganda: a population based cross–sectional study
title_fullStr Factors associated with married women’s support of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Uganda: a population based cross–sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with married women’s support of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Uganda: a population based cross–sectional study
title_short Factors associated with married women’s support of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Uganda: a population based cross–sectional study
title_sort factors associated with married women’s support of male circumcision for hiv prevention in uganda: a population based cross–sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4971618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27484177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3385-2
work_keys_str_mv AT matikomi factorsassociatedwithmarriedwomenssupportofmalecircumcisionforhivpreventioninugandaapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT adegokekoredek factorsassociatedwithmarriedwomenssupportofmalecircumcisionforhivpreventioninugandaapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy
AT salihuhamisum factorsassociatedwithmarriedwomenssupportofmalecircumcisionforhivpreventioninugandaapopulationbasedcrosssectionalstudy