Cargando…

A review on laboratory tests’ utilization: A trigger for cutting costs and quality improvement in health care settings

Background: Considering the role of laboratory tests as a central part of controlling health expenditure, this study intends to investigate laboratory tests overutilization in Iran to pave the way for future interventions. Methods: Inappropriate laboratory utilization was reviewed in a cross-section...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meidani, Zahra, Farzandipour, Mehrdad, Farrokhian, Alireza, Haghighat, Masomeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493909
_version_ 1782446203379646464
author Meidani, Zahra
Farzandipour, Mehrdad
Farrokhian, Alireza
Haghighat, Masomeh
author_facet Meidani, Zahra
Farzandipour, Mehrdad
Farrokhian, Alireza
Haghighat, Masomeh
author_sort Meidani, Zahra
collection PubMed
description Background: Considering the role of laboratory tests as a central part of controlling health expenditure, this study intends to investigate laboratory tests overutilization in Iran to pave the way for future interventions. Methods: Inappropriate laboratory utilization was reviewed in a cross-sectional survey through the retrospective analysis of 384 medical records at a tertiary center. To pave the way for future intervention, overutilization tests were classified into two categories, inappropriate and inefficient, and then they were analyzed. Frequency analysis was used to analysis patient’s age, gender, hospital wards, length of stay, and diagnosis as well as inappropriate test and inefficient tests. Results: A total of 143 (1.50 %) of the tests were inefficient and was ordered due to laboratory errors including hemolysis, inefficient sampling, or absurd results. 2522 (26.40%) of the tests were inappropriate and stem from failure to meet medical/clinical appropriateness criteria. Conclusion: Whereas, inappropriate test ordering was more frequent than inefficient tests, the initial improvement strategy should focus on physicians’ test ordering behavior through conducting proper teaching strategies, ongoing audit and educational feedback, implementing health information technology tools and employing laboratory practice guidelines (LPGs) and testing algorithms. Conducting continuous quality improvement cycle for laboratory services and training of personnel involved in blood sampling is recommended for inefficient tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4972058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49720582016-08-04 A review on laboratory tests’ utilization: A trigger for cutting costs and quality improvement in health care settings Meidani, Zahra Farzandipour, Mehrdad Farrokhian, Alireza Haghighat, Masomeh Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: Considering the role of laboratory tests as a central part of controlling health expenditure, this study intends to investigate laboratory tests overutilization in Iran to pave the way for future interventions. Methods: Inappropriate laboratory utilization was reviewed in a cross-sectional survey through the retrospective analysis of 384 medical records at a tertiary center. To pave the way for future intervention, overutilization tests were classified into two categories, inappropriate and inefficient, and then they were analyzed. Frequency analysis was used to analysis patient’s age, gender, hospital wards, length of stay, and diagnosis as well as inappropriate test and inefficient tests. Results: A total of 143 (1.50 %) of the tests were inefficient and was ordered due to laboratory errors including hemolysis, inefficient sampling, or absurd results. 2522 (26.40%) of the tests were inappropriate and stem from failure to meet medical/clinical appropriateness criteria. Conclusion: Whereas, inappropriate test ordering was more frequent than inefficient tests, the initial improvement strategy should focus on physicians’ test ordering behavior through conducting proper teaching strategies, ongoing audit and educational feedback, implementing health information technology tools and employing laboratory practice guidelines (LPGs) and testing algorithms. Conducting continuous quality improvement cycle for laboratory services and training of personnel involved in blood sampling is recommended for inefficient tests. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2016-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4972058/ /pubmed/27493909 Text en © 2016 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Meidani, Zahra
Farzandipour, Mehrdad
Farrokhian, Alireza
Haghighat, Masomeh
A review on laboratory tests’ utilization: A trigger for cutting costs and quality improvement in health care settings
title A review on laboratory tests’ utilization: A trigger for cutting costs and quality improvement in health care settings
title_full A review on laboratory tests’ utilization: A trigger for cutting costs and quality improvement in health care settings
title_fullStr A review on laboratory tests’ utilization: A trigger for cutting costs and quality improvement in health care settings
title_full_unstemmed A review on laboratory tests’ utilization: A trigger for cutting costs and quality improvement in health care settings
title_short A review on laboratory tests’ utilization: A trigger for cutting costs and quality improvement in health care settings
title_sort review on laboratory tests’ utilization: a trigger for cutting costs and quality improvement in health care settings
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493909
work_keys_str_mv AT meidanizahra areviewonlaboratorytestsutilizationatriggerforcuttingcostsandqualityimprovementinhealthcaresettings
AT farzandipourmehrdad areviewonlaboratorytestsutilizationatriggerforcuttingcostsandqualityimprovementinhealthcaresettings
AT farrokhianalireza areviewonlaboratorytestsutilizationatriggerforcuttingcostsandqualityimprovementinhealthcaresettings
AT haghighatmasomeh areviewonlaboratorytestsutilizationatriggerforcuttingcostsandqualityimprovementinhealthcaresettings
AT meidanizahra reviewonlaboratorytestsutilizationatriggerforcuttingcostsandqualityimprovementinhealthcaresettings
AT farzandipourmehrdad reviewonlaboratorytestsutilizationatriggerforcuttingcostsandqualityimprovementinhealthcaresettings
AT farrokhianalireza reviewonlaboratorytestsutilizationatriggerforcuttingcostsandqualityimprovementinhealthcaresettings
AT haghighatmasomeh reviewonlaboratorytestsutilizationatriggerforcuttingcostsandqualityimprovementinhealthcaresettings