Cargando…

Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia

The IUCN Red List has assessed the global distributions of the majority of the world’s amphibians, birds and mammals. Yet these assessments lack explicit reference to widely available, remotely-sensed data that can sensibly inform a species’ risk of extinction. Our first goal is to add additional qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Binbin V., Hughes, Alice C., Jenkins, Clinton N., Ocampo-Peñuela, Natalia, Pimm, Stuart L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27487238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160566
_version_ 1782446236647817216
author Li, Binbin V.
Hughes, Alice C.
Jenkins, Clinton N.
Ocampo-Peñuela, Natalia
Pimm, Stuart L.
author_facet Li, Binbin V.
Hughes, Alice C.
Jenkins, Clinton N.
Ocampo-Peñuela, Natalia
Pimm, Stuart L.
author_sort Li, Binbin V.
collection PubMed
description The IUCN Red List has assessed the global distributions of the majority of the world’s amphibians, birds and mammals. Yet these assessments lack explicit reference to widely available, remotely-sensed data that can sensibly inform a species’ risk of extinction. Our first goal is to add additional quantitative data to the existing standardised process that IUCN employs. Secondly, we ask: do our results suggest species of concern—those at considerably greater risk than hitherto appreciated? Thirdly, these assessments are not only important on a species-by-species basis. By combining distributions of species of concern, we map conservation priorities. We ask to what degree these areas are currently protected and how might knowledge from remote sensing modify the priorities? Finally, we develop a quick and simple method to identify and modify the priority setting in a landscape where natural habitats are disappearing rapidly and so where conventional species’ assessments might be too slow to respond. Tropical, mainland Southeast Asia is under exceptional threat, yet relatively poorly known. Here, additional quantitative measures may be particularly helpful. This region contains over 122, 183, and 214 endemic mammals, birds, and amphibians, respectively, of which the IUCN considers 37, 21, and 37 threatened. When corrected for the amount of remaining natural habitats within the known elevation preferences of species, the average sizes of species ranges shrink to <40% of their published ranges. Some 79 mammal, 49 bird, and 184 amphibian ranges are <20,000km(2)—an area at which IUCN considers most other species to be threatened. Moreover, these species are not better protected by the existing network of protected areas than are species that IUCN accepts as threatened. Simply, there appear to be considerably more species at risk than hitherto appreciated. Furthermore, incorporating remote sensing data showing where habitat loss is prevalent changes the locations of conservation priorities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4972393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49723932016-08-18 Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia Li, Binbin V. Hughes, Alice C. Jenkins, Clinton N. Ocampo-Peñuela, Natalia Pimm, Stuart L. PLoS One Research Article The IUCN Red List has assessed the global distributions of the majority of the world’s amphibians, birds and mammals. Yet these assessments lack explicit reference to widely available, remotely-sensed data that can sensibly inform a species’ risk of extinction. Our first goal is to add additional quantitative data to the existing standardised process that IUCN employs. Secondly, we ask: do our results suggest species of concern—those at considerably greater risk than hitherto appreciated? Thirdly, these assessments are not only important on a species-by-species basis. By combining distributions of species of concern, we map conservation priorities. We ask to what degree these areas are currently protected and how might knowledge from remote sensing modify the priorities? Finally, we develop a quick and simple method to identify and modify the priority setting in a landscape where natural habitats are disappearing rapidly and so where conventional species’ assessments might be too slow to respond. Tropical, mainland Southeast Asia is under exceptional threat, yet relatively poorly known. Here, additional quantitative measures may be particularly helpful. This region contains over 122, 183, and 214 endemic mammals, birds, and amphibians, respectively, of which the IUCN considers 37, 21, and 37 threatened. When corrected for the amount of remaining natural habitats within the known elevation preferences of species, the average sizes of species ranges shrink to <40% of their published ranges. Some 79 mammal, 49 bird, and 184 amphibian ranges are <20,000km(2)—an area at which IUCN considers most other species to be threatened. Moreover, these species are not better protected by the existing network of protected areas than are species that IUCN accepts as threatened. Simply, there appear to be considerably more species at risk than hitherto appreciated. Furthermore, incorporating remote sensing data showing where habitat loss is prevalent changes the locations of conservation priorities. Public Library of Science 2016-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4972393/ /pubmed/27487238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160566 Text en © 2016 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Binbin V.
Hughes, Alice C.
Jenkins, Clinton N.
Ocampo-Peñuela, Natalia
Pimm, Stuart L.
Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia
title Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia
title_full Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia
title_fullStr Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia
title_full_unstemmed Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia
title_short Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia
title_sort remotely sensed data informs red list evaluations and conservation priorities in southeast asia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27487238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160566
work_keys_str_mv AT libinbinv remotelysenseddatainformsredlistevaluationsandconservationprioritiesinsoutheastasia
AT hughesalicec remotelysenseddatainformsredlistevaluationsandconservationprioritiesinsoutheastasia
AT jenkinsclintonn remotelysenseddatainformsredlistevaluationsandconservationprioritiesinsoutheastasia
AT ocampopenuelanatalia remotelysenseddatainformsredlistevaluationsandconservationprioritiesinsoutheastasia
AT pimmstuartl remotelysenseddatainformsredlistevaluationsandconservationprioritiesinsoutheastasia