Cargando…
Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia
The IUCN Red List has assessed the global distributions of the majority of the world’s amphibians, birds and mammals. Yet these assessments lack explicit reference to widely available, remotely-sensed data that can sensibly inform a species’ risk of extinction. Our first goal is to add additional qu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27487238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160566 |
_version_ | 1782446236647817216 |
---|---|
author | Li, Binbin V. Hughes, Alice C. Jenkins, Clinton N. Ocampo-Peñuela, Natalia Pimm, Stuart L. |
author_facet | Li, Binbin V. Hughes, Alice C. Jenkins, Clinton N. Ocampo-Peñuela, Natalia Pimm, Stuart L. |
author_sort | Li, Binbin V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The IUCN Red List has assessed the global distributions of the majority of the world’s amphibians, birds and mammals. Yet these assessments lack explicit reference to widely available, remotely-sensed data that can sensibly inform a species’ risk of extinction. Our first goal is to add additional quantitative data to the existing standardised process that IUCN employs. Secondly, we ask: do our results suggest species of concern—those at considerably greater risk than hitherto appreciated? Thirdly, these assessments are not only important on a species-by-species basis. By combining distributions of species of concern, we map conservation priorities. We ask to what degree these areas are currently protected and how might knowledge from remote sensing modify the priorities? Finally, we develop a quick and simple method to identify and modify the priority setting in a landscape where natural habitats are disappearing rapidly and so where conventional species’ assessments might be too slow to respond. Tropical, mainland Southeast Asia is under exceptional threat, yet relatively poorly known. Here, additional quantitative measures may be particularly helpful. This region contains over 122, 183, and 214 endemic mammals, birds, and amphibians, respectively, of which the IUCN considers 37, 21, and 37 threatened. When corrected for the amount of remaining natural habitats within the known elevation preferences of species, the average sizes of species ranges shrink to <40% of their published ranges. Some 79 mammal, 49 bird, and 184 amphibian ranges are <20,000km(2)—an area at which IUCN considers most other species to be threatened. Moreover, these species are not better protected by the existing network of protected areas than are species that IUCN accepts as threatened. Simply, there appear to be considerably more species at risk than hitherto appreciated. Furthermore, incorporating remote sensing data showing where habitat loss is prevalent changes the locations of conservation priorities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4972393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49723932016-08-18 Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia Li, Binbin V. Hughes, Alice C. Jenkins, Clinton N. Ocampo-Peñuela, Natalia Pimm, Stuart L. PLoS One Research Article The IUCN Red List has assessed the global distributions of the majority of the world’s amphibians, birds and mammals. Yet these assessments lack explicit reference to widely available, remotely-sensed data that can sensibly inform a species’ risk of extinction. Our first goal is to add additional quantitative data to the existing standardised process that IUCN employs. Secondly, we ask: do our results suggest species of concern—those at considerably greater risk than hitherto appreciated? Thirdly, these assessments are not only important on a species-by-species basis. By combining distributions of species of concern, we map conservation priorities. We ask to what degree these areas are currently protected and how might knowledge from remote sensing modify the priorities? Finally, we develop a quick and simple method to identify and modify the priority setting in a landscape where natural habitats are disappearing rapidly and so where conventional species’ assessments might be too slow to respond. Tropical, mainland Southeast Asia is under exceptional threat, yet relatively poorly known. Here, additional quantitative measures may be particularly helpful. This region contains over 122, 183, and 214 endemic mammals, birds, and amphibians, respectively, of which the IUCN considers 37, 21, and 37 threatened. When corrected for the amount of remaining natural habitats within the known elevation preferences of species, the average sizes of species ranges shrink to <40% of their published ranges. Some 79 mammal, 49 bird, and 184 amphibian ranges are <20,000km(2)—an area at which IUCN considers most other species to be threatened. Moreover, these species are not better protected by the existing network of protected areas than are species that IUCN accepts as threatened. Simply, there appear to be considerably more species at risk than hitherto appreciated. Furthermore, incorporating remote sensing data showing where habitat loss is prevalent changes the locations of conservation priorities. Public Library of Science 2016-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4972393/ /pubmed/27487238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160566 Text en © 2016 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Binbin V. Hughes, Alice C. Jenkins, Clinton N. Ocampo-Peñuela, Natalia Pimm, Stuart L. Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia |
title | Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia |
title_full | Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia |
title_fullStr | Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia |
title_full_unstemmed | Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia |
title_short | Remotely Sensed Data Informs Red List Evaluations and Conservation Priorities in Southeast Asia |
title_sort | remotely sensed data informs red list evaluations and conservation priorities in southeast asia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27487238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160566 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT libinbinv remotelysenseddatainformsredlistevaluationsandconservationprioritiesinsoutheastasia AT hughesalicec remotelysenseddatainformsredlistevaluationsandconservationprioritiesinsoutheastasia AT jenkinsclintonn remotelysenseddatainformsredlistevaluationsandconservationprioritiesinsoutheastasia AT ocampopenuelanatalia remotelysenseddatainformsredlistevaluationsandconservationprioritiesinsoutheastasia AT pimmstuartl remotelysenseddatainformsredlistevaluationsandconservationprioritiesinsoutheastasia |