Cargando…

Cost impact of a non-invasive, portable device for patient self-administration of chronic migraine in a UK National Health Service setting

BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine (CM) is a neurological disorder associated with substantial disability. Botulinum toxin type A (Botox) is an approved and effective preventive treatment option for adult patients with CM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an alternative treatment device deliveri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brüggenjürgen, B., Baker, T., Bhogal, R., Ahmed, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2924-8
_version_ 1782446292717273088
author Brüggenjürgen, B.
Baker, T.
Bhogal, R.
Ahmed, F.
author_facet Brüggenjürgen, B.
Baker, T.
Bhogal, R.
Ahmed, F.
author_sort Brüggenjürgen, B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine (CM) is a neurological disorder associated with substantial disability. Botulinum toxin type A (Botox) is an approved and effective preventive treatment option for adult patients with CM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an alternative treatment device delivering a brief pre-set magnetic pulse used for self-administration by the patient at home. Despite being available in a risk share scheme TMS is perceived to be more costly in the UK. The objective of this study was to analyse the incremental costs of TMS compared to Botox in refractory CM patients both for a UK individual funding request setting as well as for an average UK specialist center setting. METHODS: Cost impact results were derived from a decision-tree model simulating treatment pathways over 1 year. Costs were applied from the most recently available UK data sources. Sensitivity analysis was performed for all variables. RESULTS: Based on published utilisation data 45.5 % of CM patients would continuously receive Botox over 1 year, whereas 53.7 % of TMS patients would be still on treatment at the end of year one. Total costs of Botox treatment accrue to £2923 in an individual funding request NHS cost setting, whereas TMS treatment results in £1466 in the first year. Applying a time-based NHS cost setting expenditures accrue to £1747 for the Botox treatment and to £1361 for the TMS treatment. In both cost settings variation of cost assumptions did have a minor impact on the cost increment from Botox to TMS. CONCLUSION: The current risk share based remuneration model of TMS allows the UK NHS to reimburse only the cost of those patients experiencing reduction in migraine days resulting in lower costs for treating migraine attacks. Treatment of chronic refractory migraine using TMS implies a substantial cost reduction potential for the management of chronic treatment of refractory migraine patients compared to conventional Botox treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4972802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49728022016-08-17 Cost impact of a non-invasive, portable device for patient self-administration of chronic migraine in a UK National Health Service setting Brüggenjürgen, B. Baker, T. Bhogal, R. Ahmed, F. Springerplus Research BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine (CM) is a neurological disorder associated with substantial disability. Botulinum toxin type A (Botox) is an approved and effective preventive treatment option for adult patients with CM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an alternative treatment device delivering a brief pre-set magnetic pulse used for self-administration by the patient at home. Despite being available in a risk share scheme TMS is perceived to be more costly in the UK. The objective of this study was to analyse the incremental costs of TMS compared to Botox in refractory CM patients both for a UK individual funding request setting as well as for an average UK specialist center setting. METHODS: Cost impact results were derived from a decision-tree model simulating treatment pathways over 1 year. Costs were applied from the most recently available UK data sources. Sensitivity analysis was performed for all variables. RESULTS: Based on published utilisation data 45.5 % of CM patients would continuously receive Botox over 1 year, whereas 53.7 % of TMS patients would be still on treatment at the end of year one. Total costs of Botox treatment accrue to £2923 in an individual funding request NHS cost setting, whereas TMS treatment results in £1466 in the first year. Applying a time-based NHS cost setting expenditures accrue to £1747 for the Botox treatment and to £1361 for the TMS treatment. In both cost settings variation of cost assumptions did have a minor impact on the cost increment from Botox to TMS. CONCLUSION: The current risk share based remuneration model of TMS allows the UK NHS to reimburse only the cost of those patients experiencing reduction in migraine days resulting in lower costs for treating migraine attacks. Treatment of chronic refractory migraine using TMS implies a substantial cost reduction potential for the management of chronic treatment of refractory migraine patients compared to conventional Botox treatment. Springer International Publishing 2016-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4972802/ /pubmed/27536532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2924-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Brüggenjürgen, B.
Baker, T.
Bhogal, R.
Ahmed, F.
Cost impact of a non-invasive, portable device for patient self-administration of chronic migraine in a UK National Health Service setting
title Cost impact of a non-invasive, portable device for patient self-administration of chronic migraine in a UK National Health Service setting
title_full Cost impact of a non-invasive, portable device for patient self-administration of chronic migraine in a UK National Health Service setting
title_fullStr Cost impact of a non-invasive, portable device for patient self-administration of chronic migraine in a UK National Health Service setting
title_full_unstemmed Cost impact of a non-invasive, portable device for patient self-administration of chronic migraine in a UK National Health Service setting
title_short Cost impact of a non-invasive, portable device for patient self-administration of chronic migraine in a UK National Health Service setting
title_sort cost impact of a non-invasive, portable device for patient self-administration of chronic migraine in a uk national health service setting
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2924-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bruggenjurgenb costimpactofanoninvasiveportabledeviceforpatientselfadministrationofchronicmigraineinauknationalhealthservicesetting
AT bakert costimpactofanoninvasiveportabledeviceforpatientselfadministrationofchronicmigraineinauknationalhealthservicesetting
AT bhogalr costimpactofanoninvasiveportabledeviceforpatientselfadministrationofchronicmigraineinauknationalhealthservicesetting
AT ahmedf costimpactofanoninvasiveportabledeviceforpatientselfadministrationofchronicmigraineinauknationalhealthservicesetting