Cargando…

Intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), which are not uncommon in one-lung ventilation, are among the main causes of postoperative death after lung surgery. Intra-operative ventilation strategies can influence the incidence of PPCs. High tidal volume (V(T)) and increased airway pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Zhen, Liu, Xiaowen, Huang, Yuguang, Zhao, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2867-0
_version_ 1782446293181792256
author Liu, Zhen
Liu, Xiaowen
Huang, Yuguang
Zhao, Jing
author_facet Liu, Zhen
Liu, Xiaowen
Huang, Yuguang
Zhao, Jing
author_sort Liu, Zhen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), which are not uncommon in one-lung ventilation, are among the main causes of postoperative death after lung surgery. Intra-operative ventilation strategies can influence the incidence of PPCs. High tidal volume (V(T)) and increased airway pressure may lead to lung injury, while pressure-controlled ventilation and lung-protective strategies with low V(T) may have protective effects against lung injury. In this meta-analysis, we aim to investigate the effects of different ventilation strategies, including pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), protective ventilation (PV) and conventional ventilation (CV), on PPCs in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation. We hypothesize that both PV with low V(T) and PCV have protective effects against PPCs in one-lung ventilation. METHODS: A systematic search (PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Ovid MEDLINE; in May 2015) was performed for randomized trials comparing PCV with VCV or comparing PV with CV in one-lung ventilation. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane tool for risk. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs. The secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, intraoperative plateau airway pressure (P(plateau)), oxygen index (PaO(2)/FiO(2)) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). RESULTS: In this meta-analysis, 11 studies (436 patients) comparing PCV with VCV and 11 studies (657 patients) comparing PV with CV were included. Compared to CV, PV decreased the incidence of PPCs (OR 0.29; 95 % CI 0.15–0.57; P < 0.01) and intraoperative P(plateau) (MD −3.75; 95 % CI −5.74 to −1.76; P < 0.01) but had no significant influence on the length of hospital stay or MAP. Compared to VCV, PCV decreased intraoperative P(plateau) (MD −1.46; 95 % CI −2.54 to −0.34; P = 0.01) but had no significant influence on PPCs, PaO(2)/FiO(2) or MAP. CONCLUSIONS: PV with low V(T) was associated with the reduced incidence of PPCs compared to CV. However, PCV and VCV had similar effects on the incidence of PPCs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2867-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4972804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49728042016-08-17 Intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation: a meta-analysis Liu, Zhen Liu, Xiaowen Huang, Yuguang Zhao, Jing Springerplus Research BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), which are not uncommon in one-lung ventilation, are among the main causes of postoperative death after lung surgery. Intra-operative ventilation strategies can influence the incidence of PPCs. High tidal volume (V(T)) and increased airway pressure may lead to lung injury, while pressure-controlled ventilation and lung-protective strategies with low V(T) may have protective effects against lung injury. In this meta-analysis, we aim to investigate the effects of different ventilation strategies, including pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), protective ventilation (PV) and conventional ventilation (CV), on PPCs in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation. We hypothesize that both PV with low V(T) and PCV have protective effects against PPCs in one-lung ventilation. METHODS: A systematic search (PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Ovid MEDLINE; in May 2015) was performed for randomized trials comparing PCV with VCV or comparing PV with CV in one-lung ventilation. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane tool for risk. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs. The secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, intraoperative plateau airway pressure (P(plateau)), oxygen index (PaO(2)/FiO(2)) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). RESULTS: In this meta-analysis, 11 studies (436 patients) comparing PCV with VCV and 11 studies (657 patients) comparing PV with CV were included. Compared to CV, PV decreased the incidence of PPCs (OR 0.29; 95 % CI 0.15–0.57; P < 0.01) and intraoperative P(plateau) (MD −3.75; 95 % CI −5.74 to −1.76; P < 0.01) but had no significant influence on the length of hospital stay or MAP. Compared to VCV, PCV decreased intraoperative P(plateau) (MD −1.46; 95 % CI −2.54 to −0.34; P = 0.01) but had no significant influence on PPCs, PaO(2)/FiO(2) or MAP. CONCLUSIONS: PV with low V(T) was associated with the reduced incidence of PPCs compared to CV. However, PCV and VCV had similar effects on the incidence of PPCs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2867-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4972804/ /pubmed/27536534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2867-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Zhen
Liu, Xiaowen
Huang, Yuguang
Zhao, Jing
Intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation: a meta-analysis
title Intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation: a meta-analysis
title_full Intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation: a meta-analysis
title_short Intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation: a meta-analysis
title_sort intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation: a meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2867-0
work_keys_str_mv AT liuzhen intraoperativemechanicalventilationstrategiesinpatientsundergoingonelungventilationametaanalysis
AT liuxiaowen intraoperativemechanicalventilationstrategiesinpatientsundergoingonelungventilationametaanalysis
AT huangyuguang intraoperativemechanicalventilationstrategiesinpatientsundergoingonelungventilationametaanalysis
AT zhaojing intraoperativemechanicalventilationstrategiesinpatientsundergoingonelungventilationametaanalysis