Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of bortezomib in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (VR-CAP) in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare and aggressive form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Bortezomib is the first product to be approved for the treatment of patients with previously untreated MCL, for whom haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is unsuitable, and is used in combination with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Keep, Marjolijn, Gairy, Kerry, Seshagiri, Divyagiri, Thilakarathne, Pushpike, Lee, Dawn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2633-2
_version_ 1782446335036751872
author van Keep, Marjolijn
Gairy, Kerry
Seshagiri, Divyagiri
Thilakarathne, Pushpike
Lee, Dawn
author_facet van Keep, Marjolijn
Gairy, Kerry
Seshagiri, Divyagiri
Thilakarathne, Pushpike
Lee, Dawn
author_sort van Keep, Marjolijn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare and aggressive form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Bortezomib is the first product to be approved for the treatment of patients with previously untreated MCL, for whom haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is unsuitable, and is used in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (VR-CAP). The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence recently recommended the use of VR-CAP in the UK following a technology appraisal. We present the cost effectiveness analysis performed as part of that assessment: VR-CAP versus the current standard of care regimen of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) in a UK setting. METHODS: A lifetime economic model was developed with health states based upon line of treatment and progression status. Baseline patient characteristics, dosing, safety and efficacy were based on the LYM-3002 trial. As overall survival data were immature, survival was modelled by progression status, and post-progression survival was assumed equal across arms. Utilities were derived from LYM-3002 and literature, and standard UK cost sources were used. RESULTS: Treatment with VR-CAP compared to R-CHOP gave an incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain of 0.81 at an additional cost of £16,212, resulting in a base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £20,043. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that treatment with VR-CAP was cost effective at conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds (£20,000–£30,000 per QALY). CONCLUSIONS: VR-CAP is a cost-effective option for previously untreated patients with MCL in the UK. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2633-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4972997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49729972016-08-05 Cost-effectiveness analysis of bortezomib in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (VR-CAP) in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma van Keep, Marjolijn Gairy, Kerry Seshagiri, Divyagiri Thilakarathne, Pushpike Lee, Dawn BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare and aggressive form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Bortezomib is the first product to be approved for the treatment of patients with previously untreated MCL, for whom haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is unsuitable, and is used in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (VR-CAP). The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence recently recommended the use of VR-CAP in the UK following a technology appraisal. We present the cost effectiveness analysis performed as part of that assessment: VR-CAP versus the current standard of care regimen of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) in a UK setting. METHODS: A lifetime economic model was developed with health states based upon line of treatment and progression status. Baseline patient characteristics, dosing, safety and efficacy were based on the LYM-3002 trial. As overall survival data were immature, survival was modelled by progression status, and post-progression survival was assumed equal across arms. Utilities were derived from LYM-3002 and literature, and standard UK cost sources were used. RESULTS: Treatment with VR-CAP compared to R-CHOP gave an incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain of 0.81 at an additional cost of £16,212, resulting in a base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £20,043. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that treatment with VR-CAP was cost effective at conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds (£20,000–£30,000 per QALY). CONCLUSIONS: VR-CAP is a cost-effective option for previously untreated patients with MCL in the UK. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2633-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4972997/ /pubmed/27488675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2633-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Keep, Marjolijn
Gairy, Kerry
Seshagiri, Divyagiri
Thilakarathne, Pushpike
Lee, Dawn
Cost-effectiveness analysis of bortezomib in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (VR-CAP) in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of bortezomib in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (VR-CAP) in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of bortezomib in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (VR-CAP) in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of bortezomib in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (VR-CAP) in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of bortezomib in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (VR-CAP) in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of bortezomib in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (VR-CAP) in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of bortezomib in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (vr-cap) in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2633-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vankeepmarjolijn costeffectivenessanalysisofbortezomibincombinationwithrituximabcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinvincristineandprednisonevrcapinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedmantlecelllymphoma
AT gairykerry costeffectivenessanalysisofbortezomibincombinationwithrituximabcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinvincristineandprednisonevrcapinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedmantlecelllymphoma
AT seshagiridivyagiri costeffectivenessanalysisofbortezomibincombinationwithrituximabcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinvincristineandprednisonevrcapinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedmantlecelllymphoma
AT thilakarathnepushpike costeffectivenessanalysisofbortezomibincombinationwithrituximabcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinvincristineandprednisonevrcapinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedmantlecelllymphoma
AT leedawn costeffectivenessanalysisofbortezomibincombinationwithrituximabcyclophosphamidedoxorubicinvincristineandprednisonevrcapinpatientswithpreviouslyuntreatedmantlecelllymphoma