Cargando…

A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews and a network meta-analysis show home safety education with or without the provision of safety equipment is effective in promoting poison prevention behaviours in households with children. This paper compares the cost-effectiveness of home safety interventions to promo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Achana, Felix, Sutton, Alex J., Kendrick, Denise, Hayes, Mike, Jones, David R., Hubbard, Stephanie J., Cooper, Nicola J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3334-0
_version_ 1782446341301993472
author Achana, Felix
Sutton, Alex J.
Kendrick, Denise
Hayes, Mike
Jones, David R.
Hubbard, Stephanie J.
Cooper, Nicola J.
author_facet Achana, Felix
Sutton, Alex J.
Kendrick, Denise
Hayes, Mike
Jones, David R.
Hubbard, Stephanie J.
Cooper, Nicola J.
author_sort Achana, Felix
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews and a network meta-analysis show home safety education with or without the provision of safety equipment is effective in promoting poison prevention behaviours in households with children. This paper compares the cost-effectiveness of home safety interventions to promote poison prevention practices. METHODS: A probabilistic decision-analytic model simulates healthcare costs and benefits for a hypothetical cohort of under 5 year olds. The model compares the cost-effectiveness of home safety education, home safety inspections, provision of free or low cost safety equipment and fitting of equipment. Analyses are conducted from a UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective and expressed in 2012 prices. RESULTS: Education without safety inspection, provision or fitting of equipment was the most cost-effective strategy for promoting safe storage of medicines with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2888 (95 % credible interval (CrI) £1990–£5774) per poison case avoided or £41,330 (95%CrI £20,007–£91,534) per QALY gained compared with usual care. Compared to usual care, home safety interventions were not cost-effective in promoting safe storage of other household products. CONCLUSION: Education offers better value for money than more intensive but expensive strategies for preventing medicinal poisonings, but is only likely to be cost-effective at £30,000 per QALY gained for families in disadvantaged areas and for those with more than one child. There was considerable uncertainty in cost-effectiveness estimates due to paucity of evidence on model parameters. Policy makers should consider both costs and effectiveness of competing interventions to ensure efficient use of resources. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3334-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4973049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49730492016-08-05 A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children Achana, Felix Sutton, Alex J. Kendrick, Denise Hayes, Mike Jones, David R. Hubbard, Stephanie J. Cooper, Nicola J. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews and a network meta-analysis show home safety education with or without the provision of safety equipment is effective in promoting poison prevention behaviours in households with children. This paper compares the cost-effectiveness of home safety interventions to promote poison prevention practices. METHODS: A probabilistic decision-analytic model simulates healthcare costs and benefits for a hypothetical cohort of under 5 year olds. The model compares the cost-effectiveness of home safety education, home safety inspections, provision of free or low cost safety equipment and fitting of equipment. Analyses are conducted from a UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective and expressed in 2012 prices. RESULTS: Education without safety inspection, provision or fitting of equipment was the most cost-effective strategy for promoting safe storage of medicines with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2888 (95 % credible interval (CrI) £1990–£5774) per poison case avoided or £41,330 (95%CrI £20,007–£91,534) per QALY gained compared with usual care. Compared to usual care, home safety interventions were not cost-effective in promoting safe storage of other household products. CONCLUSION: Education offers better value for money than more intensive but expensive strategies for preventing medicinal poisonings, but is only likely to be cost-effective at £30,000 per QALY gained for families in disadvantaged areas and for those with more than one child. There was considerable uncertainty in cost-effectiveness estimates due to paucity of evidence on model parameters. Policy makers should consider both costs and effectiveness of competing interventions to ensure efficient use of resources. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3334-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4973049/ /pubmed/27488449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3334-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Achana, Felix
Sutton, Alex J.
Kendrick, Denise
Hayes, Mike
Jones, David R.
Hubbard, Stephanie J.
Cooper, Nicola J.
A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
title A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
title_full A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
title_fullStr A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
title_full_unstemmed A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
title_short A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
title_sort decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3334-0
work_keys_str_mv AT achanafelix adecisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT suttonalexj adecisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT kendrickdenise adecisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT hayesmike adecisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT jonesdavidr adecisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT hubbardstephaniej adecisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT coopernicolaj adecisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT achanafelix decisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT suttonalexj decisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT kendrickdenise decisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT hayesmike decisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT jonesdavidr decisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT hubbardstephaniej decisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren
AT coopernicolaj decisionanalyticmodeltoinvestigatethecosteffectivenessofpoisoningpreventionpracticesinhouseholdswithyoungchildren