Cargando…

L1CAM as a prognostic marker in stage I endometrial cancer: a validation study

BACKGROUND: L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) overexpression has been reported to be strongly associated with poor prognosis in early stage endometrial cancer (EC). We aimed at the validation of L1CAM as a marker of poor prognosis in an independent study population. METHODS: Patients with endometrio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smogeli, Elisabeth, Davidson, Ben, Cvancarova, Milada, Holth, Arild, Katz, Betina, Risberg, Bjørn, Kristensen, Gunnar, Lindemann, Kristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2631-4
_version_ 1782446349718913024
author Smogeli, Elisabeth
Davidson, Ben
Cvancarova, Milada
Holth, Arild
Katz, Betina
Risberg, Bjørn
Kristensen, Gunnar
Lindemann, Kristina
author_facet Smogeli, Elisabeth
Davidson, Ben
Cvancarova, Milada
Holth, Arild
Katz, Betina
Risberg, Bjørn
Kristensen, Gunnar
Lindemann, Kristina
author_sort Smogeli, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) overexpression has been reported to be strongly associated with poor prognosis in early stage endometrial cancer (EC). We aimed at the validation of L1CAM as a marker of poor prognosis in an independent study population. METHODS: Patients with endometrioid EC FIGO stage I, were treated at Oslo University Hospital between 2005 and 2012. L1CAM expression was detected by immunohistochemistry with >10 % L1CAM staining defined as positive. Risks of relapse and death were estimated as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). RESULTS: Of 450 patients, 388 (86 %) were evaluable for L1CAM expression and 35 (9 %) were L1CAM positive. After follow-up for a median time of 4.8 years (0.1–8.8), 33 (8 %) patients had recurred. 6/35 (17 %) L1CAM positive patients relapsed compared to 27/353 (8 %) L1CAM-negative patients. There were 7 (20 %) deaths in the L1CAM positive group, and 34 (10 %) in the negative group. In multivariate analysis, controlled for age and FIGO stage, L1CAM positivity was not significantly associated with the risk of relapse (HR 2.08, 95 % CI: 0.85–5.10, p = 0.11) or death of all-cause (HR 1.81, 95 % CI: 0.79–4.11, p = 0.16). In patients who were not treated with chemotherapy, L1CAM was significantly associated with risk of relapse (HR 2.9; 95 % CI: 1.08–7.56; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our report confirms that L1CAM is associated with a more aggressive tumortype and more distant relapses. The overall recurrence rate in this population was low as were the absolute differences between L1CAM positive and negative patients. In this independent study sample, L1CAM failed to be a clinically relevant marker of poor prognosis in stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4973089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49730892016-08-05 L1CAM as a prognostic marker in stage I endometrial cancer: a validation study Smogeli, Elisabeth Davidson, Ben Cvancarova, Milada Holth, Arild Katz, Betina Risberg, Bjørn Kristensen, Gunnar Lindemann, Kristina BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) overexpression has been reported to be strongly associated with poor prognosis in early stage endometrial cancer (EC). We aimed at the validation of L1CAM as a marker of poor prognosis in an independent study population. METHODS: Patients with endometrioid EC FIGO stage I, were treated at Oslo University Hospital between 2005 and 2012. L1CAM expression was detected by immunohistochemistry with >10 % L1CAM staining defined as positive. Risks of relapse and death were estimated as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). RESULTS: Of 450 patients, 388 (86 %) were evaluable for L1CAM expression and 35 (9 %) were L1CAM positive. After follow-up for a median time of 4.8 years (0.1–8.8), 33 (8 %) patients had recurred. 6/35 (17 %) L1CAM positive patients relapsed compared to 27/353 (8 %) L1CAM-negative patients. There were 7 (20 %) deaths in the L1CAM positive group, and 34 (10 %) in the negative group. In multivariate analysis, controlled for age and FIGO stage, L1CAM positivity was not significantly associated with the risk of relapse (HR 2.08, 95 % CI: 0.85–5.10, p = 0.11) or death of all-cause (HR 1.81, 95 % CI: 0.79–4.11, p = 0.16). In patients who were not treated with chemotherapy, L1CAM was significantly associated with risk of relapse (HR 2.9; 95 % CI: 1.08–7.56; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our report confirms that L1CAM is associated with a more aggressive tumortype and more distant relapses. The overall recurrence rate in this population was low as were the absolute differences between L1CAM positive and negative patients. In this independent study sample, L1CAM failed to be a clinically relevant marker of poor prognosis in stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. BioMed Central 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4973089/ /pubmed/27488577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2631-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smogeli, Elisabeth
Davidson, Ben
Cvancarova, Milada
Holth, Arild
Katz, Betina
Risberg, Bjørn
Kristensen, Gunnar
Lindemann, Kristina
L1CAM as a prognostic marker in stage I endometrial cancer: a validation study
title L1CAM as a prognostic marker in stage I endometrial cancer: a validation study
title_full L1CAM as a prognostic marker in stage I endometrial cancer: a validation study
title_fullStr L1CAM as a prognostic marker in stage I endometrial cancer: a validation study
title_full_unstemmed L1CAM as a prognostic marker in stage I endometrial cancer: a validation study
title_short L1CAM as a prognostic marker in stage I endometrial cancer: a validation study
title_sort l1cam as a prognostic marker in stage i endometrial cancer: a validation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2631-4
work_keys_str_mv AT smogelielisabeth l1camasaprognosticmarkerinstageiendometrialcanceravalidationstudy
AT davidsonben l1camasaprognosticmarkerinstageiendometrialcanceravalidationstudy
AT cvancarovamilada l1camasaprognosticmarkerinstageiendometrialcanceravalidationstudy
AT holtharild l1camasaprognosticmarkerinstageiendometrialcanceravalidationstudy
AT katzbetina l1camasaprognosticmarkerinstageiendometrialcanceravalidationstudy
AT risbergbjørn l1camasaprognosticmarkerinstageiendometrialcanceravalidationstudy
AT kristensengunnar l1camasaprognosticmarkerinstageiendometrialcanceravalidationstudy
AT lindemannkristina l1camasaprognosticmarkerinstageiendometrialcanceravalidationstudy