Cargando…

The impact of leadership hubs on the uptake of evidence-informed nursing practices and workplace policies for HIV care: a quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa

BACKGROUND: The enormous impact of HIV on communities and health services in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean has especially affected nurses, who comprise the largest proportion of the health workforce in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Strengthening action-based leadership for and by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwards, Nancy, Kaseje, Dan, Kahwa, Eulalia, Klopper, Hester C., Mill, Judy, Webber, June, Roelofs, Susan, Harrowing, Jean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0478-3
_version_ 1782446354346278912
author Edwards, Nancy
Kaseje, Dan
Kahwa, Eulalia
Klopper, Hester C.
Mill, Judy
Webber, June
Roelofs, Susan
Harrowing, Jean
author_facet Edwards, Nancy
Kaseje, Dan
Kahwa, Eulalia
Klopper, Hester C.
Mill, Judy
Webber, June
Roelofs, Susan
Harrowing, Jean
author_sort Edwards, Nancy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The enormous impact of HIV on communities and health services in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean has especially affected nurses, who comprise the largest proportion of the health workforce in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Strengthening action-based leadership for and by nurses is a means to improve the uptake of evidence-informed practices for HIV care. METHODS: A prospective quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa examined the impact of establishing multi-stakeholder leadership hubs on evidence-informed HIV care practices. Hub members were engaged through a participatory action research (PAR) approach. Three intervention districts were purposefully selected in each country, and three control districts were chosen in Jamaica, Kenya and Uganda. WHO level 3, 4 and 5 health care institutions and their employed nurses were randomly sampled. Self-administered, validated instruments measured clinical practices (reports of self and peers), quality assurance, work place policies and stigma at baseline and follow-up. Standardised average scores ranging from 0 to 1 were computed for clinical practices, quality assurance and work place policies. Stigma scores were summarised as 0 (no reports) versus 1 (one or more reports). Pre-post differences in outcomes between intervention and control groups were compared using the Mantel Haenszel chi-square for dichotomised stigma scores, and independent t tests for other measures. For South Africa, which had no control group, pre-post differences were compared using a Pearson chi-square and independent t test. Multivariate analysis was completed for Jamaica and Kenya. Hub members in all countries self-assessed changes in their capacity at follow-up; these were examined using a paired t test. RESULTS: Response rates among health care institutions were 90.2 and 80.4 % at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Results were mixed. There were small but statistically significant pre-post, intervention versus control district improvements in workplace policies and quality assurance in Jamaica, but these were primarily due to a decline in scores in the control group. There were modest improvements in clinical practices, workplace policies and quality assurance in South Africa (pre-post) (clinical practices of self—pre 0.67 (95 % CI, 0.62, 0.72) versus post 0.78 (95 % CI, 0.73–0.82), p = 0.002; workplace policies—pre 0.82 (95 % CI, 0.70, 0.85) versus post 0.87 (95 % CI, 0.84, 0.90), p = 0.001; quality assurance—pre 0.72 (95 % CI, 0.67, 0.77) versus post 0.84 (95 % CI, 0.80, 0.88)). There were statistically significant improvements in scores for nurses stigmatising patients (Jamaica reports of not stigmatising—pre-post intervention 33.9 versus 62.4 %, pre-post control 54.7 versus 64.4 %, p = 0.002—and Kenya pre-post intervention 35 versus 51.6 %, pre-post control 34.2 versus 47.8 %, p = 0.006) and for nurses being stigmatised (Kenya reports of no stigmatisation—pre-post intervention 23 versus 37.3 %, pre-post control 15.4 versus 27 %, p = 0.004). Multivariate results for Kenya and Jamaica were non-significant. Twelve hubs were established; 11 were active at follow-up. Hub members (n = 34) reported significant improvements in their capacity to address care gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Leadership hubs, comprising nurses and other stakeholders committed to change and provided with capacity building can collectively identify issues and act on strategies that may improve practice and policy. Overall, hubs did not provide the necessary force to improve the uptake of evidence-informed HIV care in their districts. If hubs are to succeed, they must be integrated within district health authorities and become part of formal, legal organisations that can regularise and sustain them. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0478-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4973110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49731102016-08-05 The impact of leadership hubs on the uptake of evidence-informed nursing practices and workplace policies for HIV care: a quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa Edwards, Nancy Kaseje, Dan Kahwa, Eulalia Klopper, Hester C. Mill, Judy Webber, June Roelofs, Susan Harrowing, Jean Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: The enormous impact of HIV on communities and health services in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean has especially affected nurses, who comprise the largest proportion of the health workforce in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Strengthening action-based leadership for and by nurses is a means to improve the uptake of evidence-informed practices for HIV care. METHODS: A prospective quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa examined the impact of establishing multi-stakeholder leadership hubs on evidence-informed HIV care practices. Hub members were engaged through a participatory action research (PAR) approach. Three intervention districts were purposefully selected in each country, and three control districts were chosen in Jamaica, Kenya and Uganda. WHO level 3, 4 and 5 health care institutions and their employed nurses were randomly sampled. Self-administered, validated instruments measured clinical practices (reports of self and peers), quality assurance, work place policies and stigma at baseline and follow-up. Standardised average scores ranging from 0 to 1 were computed for clinical practices, quality assurance and work place policies. Stigma scores were summarised as 0 (no reports) versus 1 (one or more reports). Pre-post differences in outcomes between intervention and control groups were compared using the Mantel Haenszel chi-square for dichotomised stigma scores, and independent t tests for other measures. For South Africa, which had no control group, pre-post differences were compared using a Pearson chi-square and independent t test. Multivariate analysis was completed for Jamaica and Kenya. Hub members in all countries self-assessed changes in their capacity at follow-up; these were examined using a paired t test. RESULTS: Response rates among health care institutions were 90.2 and 80.4 % at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Results were mixed. There were small but statistically significant pre-post, intervention versus control district improvements in workplace policies and quality assurance in Jamaica, but these were primarily due to a decline in scores in the control group. There were modest improvements in clinical practices, workplace policies and quality assurance in South Africa (pre-post) (clinical practices of self—pre 0.67 (95 % CI, 0.62, 0.72) versus post 0.78 (95 % CI, 0.73–0.82), p = 0.002; workplace policies—pre 0.82 (95 % CI, 0.70, 0.85) versus post 0.87 (95 % CI, 0.84, 0.90), p = 0.001; quality assurance—pre 0.72 (95 % CI, 0.67, 0.77) versus post 0.84 (95 % CI, 0.80, 0.88)). There were statistically significant improvements in scores for nurses stigmatising patients (Jamaica reports of not stigmatising—pre-post intervention 33.9 versus 62.4 %, pre-post control 54.7 versus 64.4 %, p = 0.002—and Kenya pre-post intervention 35 versus 51.6 %, pre-post control 34.2 versus 47.8 %, p = 0.006) and for nurses being stigmatised (Kenya reports of no stigmatisation—pre-post intervention 23 versus 37.3 %, pre-post control 15.4 versus 27 %, p = 0.004). Multivariate results for Kenya and Jamaica were non-significant. Twelve hubs were established; 11 were active at follow-up. Hub members (n = 34) reported significant improvements in their capacity to address care gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Leadership hubs, comprising nurses and other stakeholders committed to change and provided with capacity building can collectively identify issues and act on strategies that may improve practice and policy. Overall, hubs did not provide the necessary force to improve the uptake of evidence-informed HIV care in their districts. If hubs are to succeed, they must be integrated within district health authorities and become part of formal, legal organisations that can regularise and sustain them. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0478-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4973110/ /pubmed/27488735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0478-3 Text en © Edwards et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Edwards, Nancy
Kaseje, Dan
Kahwa, Eulalia
Klopper, Hester C.
Mill, Judy
Webber, June
Roelofs, Susan
Harrowing, Jean
The impact of leadership hubs on the uptake of evidence-informed nursing practices and workplace policies for HIV care: a quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa
title The impact of leadership hubs on the uptake of evidence-informed nursing practices and workplace policies for HIV care: a quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa
title_full The impact of leadership hubs on the uptake of evidence-informed nursing practices and workplace policies for HIV care: a quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa
title_fullStr The impact of leadership hubs on the uptake of evidence-informed nursing practices and workplace policies for HIV care: a quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa
title_full_unstemmed The impact of leadership hubs on the uptake of evidence-informed nursing practices and workplace policies for HIV care: a quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa
title_short The impact of leadership hubs on the uptake of evidence-informed nursing practices and workplace policies for HIV care: a quasi-experimental study in Jamaica, Kenya, Uganda and South Africa
title_sort impact of leadership hubs on the uptake of evidence-informed nursing practices and workplace policies for hiv care: a quasi-experimental study in jamaica, kenya, uganda and south africa
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0478-3
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardsnancy theimpactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT kasejedan theimpactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT kahwaeulalia theimpactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT klopperhesterc theimpactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT milljudy theimpactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT webberjune theimpactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT roelofssusan theimpactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT harrowingjean theimpactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT edwardsnancy impactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT kasejedan impactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT kahwaeulalia impactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT klopperhesterc impactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT milljudy impactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT webberjune impactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT roelofssusan impactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica
AT harrowingjean impactofleadershiphubsontheuptakeofevidenceinformednursingpracticesandworkplacepoliciesforhivcareaquasiexperimentalstudyinjamaicakenyaugandaandsouthafrica