Cargando…
The assessment of depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of psychometric validation studies
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of depression in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is high; however, symptoms common to both conditions makes measurement difficult. There is no high quality overview of validation studies to guide the choice of depression inventory for this population. METHODS: A syst...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27491674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0931-5 |
_version_ | 1782446414746353664 |
---|---|
author | Hind, Daniel Kaklamanou, Daphne Beever, Dan Webster, Rosie Lee, Ellen Barkham, Michael Cooper, Cindy |
author_facet | Hind, Daniel Kaklamanou, Daphne Beever, Dan Webster, Rosie Lee, Ellen Barkham, Michael Cooper, Cindy |
author_sort | Hind, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prevalence of depression in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is high; however, symptoms common to both conditions makes measurement difficult. There is no high quality overview of validation studies to guide the choice of depression inventory for this population. METHODS: A systematic review of studies validating the use of generic depression inventories in people with MS was conducted using MEDLINE and PsycINFO. Studies validating the use of depression inventories in PwMS and published in English were included; validation studies of tests for cognitive function and general mental health were excluded. Eligible studies were then quality assessed using the COSMIN checklist and findings synthesised narratively by instrument and validity domain. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (N = 5,991 PwMS) evaluating 12 instruments were included in the review. Risk of bias varied greatly between instrument and validity domain. CONCLUSIONS: The review of validation studies was constrained by poor quality reporting and outcome reporting bias. Well-conducted evaluations of some instruments are unavailable for some validity domains. This systematic review provides an evidence base for trade-offs in the selection of an instrument for assessing self-reported symptoms of depression in research or clinical practice involving people with MS. We make detailed and specific recommendations for where further research is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014010597 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4973535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49735352016-08-05 The assessment of depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of psychometric validation studies Hind, Daniel Kaklamanou, Daphne Beever, Dan Webster, Rosie Lee, Ellen Barkham, Michael Cooper, Cindy BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The prevalence of depression in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is high; however, symptoms common to both conditions makes measurement difficult. There is no high quality overview of validation studies to guide the choice of depression inventory for this population. METHODS: A systematic review of studies validating the use of generic depression inventories in people with MS was conducted using MEDLINE and PsycINFO. Studies validating the use of depression inventories in PwMS and published in English were included; validation studies of tests for cognitive function and general mental health were excluded. Eligible studies were then quality assessed using the COSMIN checklist and findings synthesised narratively by instrument and validity domain. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (N = 5,991 PwMS) evaluating 12 instruments were included in the review. Risk of bias varied greatly between instrument and validity domain. CONCLUSIONS: The review of validation studies was constrained by poor quality reporting and outcome reporting bias. Well-conducted evaluations of some instruments are unavailable for some validity domains. This systematic review provides an evidence base for trade-offs in the selection of an instrument for assessing self-reported symptoms of depression in research or clinical practice involving people with MS. We make detailed and specific recommendations for where further research is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014010597 BioMed Central 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4973535/ /pubmed/27491674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0931-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hind, Daniel Kaklamanou, Daphne Beever, Dan Webster, Rosie Lee, Ellen Barkham, Michael Cooper, Cindy The assessment of depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of psychometric validation studies |
title | The assessment of depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of psychometric validation studies |
title_full | The assessment of depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of psychometric validation studies |
title_fullStr | The assessment of depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of psychometric validation studies |
title_full_unstemmed | The assessment of depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of psychometric validation studies |
title_short | The assessment of depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of psychometric validation studies |
title_sort | assessment of depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of psychometric validation studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27491674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0931-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hinddaniel theassessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT kaklamanoudaphne theassessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT beeverdan theassessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT websterrosie theassessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT leeellen theassessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT barkhammichael theassessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT coopercindy theassessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT hinddaniel assessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT kaklamanoudaphne assessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT beeverdan assessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT websterrosie assessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT leeellen assessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT barkhammichael assessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies AT coopercindy assessmentofdepressioninpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewofpsychometricvalidationstudies |