Cargando…
A meta‐analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics
Both active and passive forest restoration schemes are used in degraded landscapes across the world to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem service provision. Restoration is increasingly also being implemented in biodiversity offset schemes as compensation for loss of natural habitat to anthropogenic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26040756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12548 |
_version_ | 1782446437523521536 |
---|---|
author | Spake, Rebecca Ezard, Thomas H. G. Martin, Philip A. Newton, Adrian C. Doncaster, C. Patrick |
author_facet | Spake, Rebecca Ezard, Thomas H. G. Martin, Philip A. Newton, Adrian C. Doncaster, C. Patrick |
author_sort | Spake, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Both active and passive forest restoration schemes are used in degraded landscapes across the world to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem service provision. Restoration is increasingly also being implemented in biodiversity offset schemes as compensation for loss of natural habitat to anthropogenic development. This has raised concerns about the value of replacing old‐growth forest with plantations, motivating research on biodiversity recovery as forest stands age. Functional diversity is now advocated as a key metric for restoration success, yet it has received little analytical attention to date. We conducted a meta‐analysis of 90 studies that measured differences in species richness for functional groups of fungi, lichens, and beetles between old‐growth control and planted or secondary treatment forests in temperate, boreal, and Mediterranean regions. We identified functional‐group–specific relationships in the response of species richness to stand age after forest disturbance. Ectomycorrhizal fungi averaged 90 years for recovery to old‐growth values (between 45 years and unrecoverable at 95% prediction limits), and epiphytic lichens took 180 years to reach 90% of old‐growth values (between 140 years and never for recovery to old‐growth values at 95% prediction limits). Non‐saproxylic beetle richness, in contrast, decreased as stand age of broadleaved forests increased. The slow recovery by some functional groups essential to ecosystem functioning makes old‐growth forest an effectively irreplaceable biodiversity resource that should be exempt from biodiversity offsetting initiatives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4973697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49736972016-08-17 A meta‐analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics Spake, Rebecca Ezard, Thomas H. G. Martin, Philip A. Newton, Adrian C. Doncaster, C. Patrick Conserv Biol Contributed Papers Both active and passive forest restoration schemes are used in degraded landscapes across the world to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem service provision. Restoration is increasingly also being implemented in biodiversity offset schemes as compensation for loss of natural habitat to anthropogenic development. This has raised concerns about the value of replacing old‐growth forest with plantations, motivating research on biodiversity recovery as forest stands age. Functional diversity is now advocated as a key metric for restoration success, yet it has received little analytical attention to date. We conducted a meta‐analysis of 90 studies that measured differences in species richness for functional groups of fungi, lichens, and beetles between old‐growth control and planted or secondary treatment forests in temperate, boreal, and Mediterranean regions. We identified functional‐group–specific relationships in the response of species richness to stand age after forest disturbance. Ectomycorrhizal fungi averaged 90 years for recovery to old‐growth values (between 45 years and unrecoverable at 95% prediction limits), and epiphytic lichens took 180 years to reach 90% of old‐growth values (between 140 years and never for recovery to old‐growth values at 95% prediction limits). Non‐saproxylic beetle richness, in contrast, decreased as stand age of broadleaved forests increased. The slow recovery by some functional groups essential to ecosystem functioning makes old‐growth forest an effectively irreplaceable biodiversity resource that should be exempt from biodiversity offsetting initiatives. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06-03 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4973697/ /pubmed/26040756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12548 Text en © 2015 The Authors Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Contributed Papers Spake, Rebecca Ezard, Thomas H. G. Martin, Philip A. Newton, Adrian C. Doncaster, C. Patrick A meta‐analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics |
title | A meta‐analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics |
title_full | A meta‐analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics |
title_fullStr | A meta‐analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics |
title_full_unstemmed | A meta‐analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics |
title_short | A meta‐analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics |
title_sort | meta‐analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics |
topic | Contributed Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26040756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12548 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spakerebecca ametaanalysisoffunctionalgroupresponsestoforestrecoveryoutsideofthetropics AT ezardthomashg ametaanalysisoffunctionalgroupresponsestoforestrecoveryoutsideofthetropics AT martinphilipa ametaanalysisoffunctionalgroupresponsestoforestrecoveryoutsideofthetropics AT newtonadrianc ametaanalysisoffunctionalgroupresponsestoforestrecoveryoutsideofthetropics AT doncastercpatrick ametaanalysisoffunctionalgroupresponsestoforestrecoveryoutsideofthetropics AT spakerebecca metaanalysisoffunctionalgroupresponsestoforestrecoveryoutsideofthetropics AT ezardthomashg metaanalysisoffunctionalgroupresponsestoforestrecoveryoutsideofthetropics AT martinphilipa metaanalysisoffunctionalgroupresponsestoforestrecoveryoutsideofthetropics AT newtonadrianc metaanalysisoffunctionalgroupresponsestoforestrecoveryoutsideofthetropics AT doncastercpatrick metaanalysisoffunctionalgroupresponsestoforestrecoveryoutsideofthetropics |