Cargando…

Detection of peripheral arterial disease with an improved automated device: comparison of a new oscillometric device and the standard Doppler method

In occidental countries, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an important health issue; however, most subjects are asymptomatic (~50%) and therefore undiagnosed and untreated. Current guidelines recommend screening for PAD in primary care setting using ankle brachial index (ABI) in all patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Špan, Matjaž, Geršak, Gregor, Millasseau, Sandrine C, Meža, Marko, Košir, Andrej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536125
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S106534
_version_ 1782446442691952640
author Špan, Matjaž
Geršak, Gregor
Millasseau, Sandrine C
Meža, Marko
Košir, Andrej
author_facet Špan, Matjaž
Geršak, Gregor
Millasseau, Sandrine C
Meža, Marko
Košir, Andrej
author_sort Špan, Matjaž
collection PubMed
description In occidental countries, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an important health issue; however, most subjects are asymptomatic (~50%) and therefore undiagnosed and untreated. Current guidelines recommend screening for PAD in primary care setting using ankle brachial index (ABI) in all patients with cardiovascular risks. This is, however, not performed strictly because the standard Doppler method is cumbersome and time-consuming. Here, we evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of ABI measurements obtained by an improved automated oscillometric device, the MESI ABPI MD(®) device, and the standard Doppler method. ABI was measured in random order in a general practice with Doppler probes by two operators separately (ABI_dop) and twice with the MESI ABPI MD device (ABI_mesi). ABI_dop was calculated dividing the highest systolic blood pressure from both tibial and dorsalis pedis arteries by the highest systolic blood pressure of both brachial arteries. ABI_mesi was obtained automatically with simultaneous measurements on three extremities. According to ABI_dop, PAD was present in 10% of the 136 screened subjects (68.2±7.4 years). Interoperator coefficient of variation was 5.5% for ABI_dop, while the intrasubject coefficient of variation for ABI_mesi was 3.0%. ABI_mesi was correlated with ABI_dop (R=0.61, P<0.0001). The difference between the two techniques was 0.06±0.14 with ABI_mesi providing slightly higher values (P<0.0001) and negligible bias across the range (R=0.19, P<0.0001). Therefore, ABI_mesi ≤1 had a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 96% to detect ABI_dop ≤0.9 and hence PAD. Doppler measurements took seven times longer than MESI ABPI MD measurements to be performed. In conclusion, MESI improved automated oscillometric method and offered a faster and repeatable measurement of ABI with only a small, clinically irrelevant overestimation of ABI value. The tested MESI ABPI MD-improved oscillometric system can be used as a screening tool for patients in general practice and would enable family doctors to comply with current guidelines for PAD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4973721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49737212016-08-17 Detection of peripheral arterial disease with an improved automated device: comparison of a new oscillometric device and the standard Doppler method Špan, Matjaž Geršak, Gregor Millasseau, Sandrine C Meža, Marko Košir, Andrej Vasc Health Risk Manag Original Research In occidental countries, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an important health issue; however, most subjects are asymptomatic (~50%) and therefore undiagnosed and untreated. Current guidelines recommend screening for PAD in primary care setting using ankle brachial index (ABI) in all patients with cardiovascular risks. This is, however, not performed strictly because the standard Doppler method is cumbersome and time-consuming. Here, we evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of ABI measurements obtained by an improved automated oscillometric device, the MESI ABPI MD(®) device, and the standard Doppler method. ABI was measured in random order in a general practice with Doppler probes by two operators separately (ABI_dop) and twice with the MESI ABPI MD device (ABI_mesi). ABI_dop was calculated dividing the highest systolic blood pressure from both tibial and dorsalis pedis arteries by the highest systolic blood pressure of both brachial arteries. ABI_mesi was obtained automatically with simultaneous measurements on three extremities. According to ABI_dop, PAD was present in 10% of the 136 screened subjects (68.2±7.4 years). Interoperator coefficient of variation was 5.5% for ABI_dop, while the intrasubject coefficient of variation for ABI_mesi was 3.0%. ABI_mesi was correlated with ABI_dop (R=0.61, P<0.0001). The difference between the two techniques was 0.06±0.14 with ABI_mesi providing slightly higher values (P<0.0001) and negligible bias across the range (R=0.19, P<0.0001). Therefore, ABI_mesi ≤1 had a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 96% to detect ABI_dop ≤0.9 and hence PAD. Doppler measurements took seven times longer than MESI ABPI MD measurements to be performed. In conclusion, MESI improved automated oscillometric method and offered a faster and repeatable measurement of ABI with only a small, clinically irrelevant overestimation of ABI value. The tested MESI ABPI MD-improved oscillometric system can be used as a screening tool for patients in general practice and would enable family doctors to comply with current guidelines for PAD. Dove Medical Press 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4973721/ /pubmed/27536125 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S106534 Text en © 2016 Špan et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Špan, Matjaž
Geršak, Gregor
Millasseau, Sandrine C
Meža, Marko
Košir, Andrej
Detection of peripheral arterial disease with an improved automated device: comparison of a new oscillometric device and the standard Doppler method
title Detection of peripheral arterial disease with an improved automated device: comparison of a new oscillometric device and the standard Doppler method
title_full Detection of peripheral arterial disease with an improved automated device: comparison of a new oscillometric device and the standard Doppler method
title_fullStr Detection of peripheral arterial disease with an improved automated device: comparison of a new oscillometric device and the standard Doppler method
title_full_unstemmed Detection of peripheral arterial disease with an improved automated device: comparison of a new oscillometric device and the standard Doppler method
title_short Detection of peripheral arterial disease with an improved automated device: comparison of a new oscillometric device and the standard Doppler method
title_sort detection of peripheral arterial disease with an improved automated device: comparison of a new oscillometric device and the standard doppler method
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536125
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S106534
work_keys_str_mv AT spanmatjaz detectionofperipheralarterialdiseasewithanimprovedautomateddevicecomparisonofanewoscillometricdeviceandthestandarddopplermethod
AT gersakgregor detectionofperipheralarterialdiseasewithanimprovedautomateddevicecomparisonofanewoscillometricdeviceandthestandarddopplermethod
AT millasseausandrinec detectionofperipheralarterialdiseasewithanimprovedautomateddevicecomparisonofanewoscillometricdeviceandthestandarddopplermethod
AT mezamarko detectionofperipheralarterialdiseasewithanimprovedautomateddevicecomparisonofanewoscillometricdeviceandthestandarddopplermethod
AT kosirandrej detectionofperipheralarterialdiseasewithanimprovedautomateddevicecomparisonofanewoscillometricdeviceandthestandarddopplermethod