Cargando…
Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time
PURPOSE: The calculation of the calibration parameter M, which represents the maximum theoretically possible blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal increase, is an essential intermediate step in any calibrated fMRI experiment. To better compare M values obtained across different studies, it is c...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25761759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25603 |
_version_ | 1782446456907497472 |
---|---|
author | Hare, Hannah V. Bulte, Daniel P. |
author_facet | Hare, Hannah V. Bulte, Daniel P. |
author_sort | Hare, Hannah V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The calculation of the calibration parameter M, which represents the maximum theoretically possible blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal increase, is an essential intermediate step in any calibrated fMRI experiment. To better compare M values obtained across different studies, it is common to scale M values from their original BOLD echo time (TE) to a different echo time according to the theory that M is directly proportional to TE. To the best of our knowledge, this relationship has never been directly tested. THEORY AND METHODS: A pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling sequence with five readouts (TE ranging from 20 to 78 ms) was implemented to test the relationship between M and TE, both with and without the application of flow crushing gradients. RESULTS: Both M and the BOLD signal were found to be linear functions of TE, but with a nonzero intercept. This intercept was reduced when crusher gradients were added, suggesting that the deviation from theory is a result of nonnegligible intravascular signal. CONCLUSION: The linear scaling method introduces some error when comparing M values acquired with different BOLD echo times. However, this error is small compared with other considerations, and would generally not preclude the continued use of this scaling method. Magn Reson Med 75:556–561, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4973822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49738222016-08-17 Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time Hare, Hannah V. Bulte, Daniel P. Magn Reson Med Imaging Methodology—Full Papers PURPOSE: The calculation of the calibration parameter M, which represents the maximum theoretically possible blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal increase, is an essential intermediate step in any calibrated fMRI experiment. To better compare M values obtained across different studies, it is common to scale M values from their original BOLD echo time (TE) to a different echo time according to the theory that M is directly proportional to TE. To the best of our knowledge, this relationship has never been directly tested. THEORY AND METHODS: A pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling sequence with five readouts (TE ranging from 20 to 78 ms) was implemented to test the relationship between M and TE, both with and without the application of flow crushing gradients. RESULTS: Both M and the BOLD signal were found to be linear functions of TE, but with a nonzero intercept. This intercept was reduced when crusher gradients were added, suggesting that the deviation from theory is a result of nonnegligible intravascular signal. CONCLUSION: The linear scaling method introduces some error when comparing M values acquired with different BOLD echo times. However, this error is small compared with other considerations, and would generally not preclude the continued use of this scaling method. Magn Reson Med 75:556–561, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-03-11 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4973822/ /pubmed/25761759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25603 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Imaging Methodology—Full Papers Hare, Hannah V. Bulte, Daniel P. Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time |
title | Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time |
title_full | Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time |
title_fullStr | Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time |
title_short | Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time |
title_sort | investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter m on echo time |
topic | Imaging Methodology—Full Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25761759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25603 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harehannahv investigatingthedependenceofthecalibrationparametermonechotime AT bultedanielp investigatingthedependenceofthecalibrationparametermonechotime |