Cargando…

Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time

PURPOSE: The calculation of the calibration parameter M, which represents the maximum theoretically possible blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal increase, is an essential intermediate step in any calibrated fMRI experiment. To better compare M values obtained across different studies, it is c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hare, Hannah V., Bulte, Daniel P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25761759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25603
_version_ 1782446456907497472
author Hare, Hannah V.
Bulte, Daniel P.
author_facet Hare, Hannah V.
Bulte, Daniel P.
author_sort Hare, Hannah V.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The calculation of the calibration parameter M, which represents the maximum theoretically possible blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal increase, is an essential intermediate step in any calibrated fMRI experiment. To better compare M values obtained across different studies, it is common to scale M values from their original BOLD echo time (TE) to a different echo time according to the theory that M is directly proportional to TE. To the best of our knowledge, this relationship has never been directly tested. THEORY AND METHODS: A pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling sequence with five readouts (TE ranging from 20 to 78 ms) was implemented to test the relationship between M and TE, both with and without the application of flow crushing gradients. RESULTS: Both M and the BOLD signal were found to be linear functions of TE, but with a nonzero intercept. This intercept was reduced when crusher gradients were added, suggesting that the deviation from theory is a result of nonnegligible intravascular signal. CONCLUSION: The linear scaling method introduces some error when comparing M values acquired with different BOLD echo times. However, this error is small compared with other considerations, and would generally not preclude the continued use of this scaling method. Magn Reson Med 75:556–561, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4973822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49738222016-08-17 Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time Hare, Hannah V. Bulte, Daniel P. Magn Reson Med Imaging Methodology—Full Papers PURPOSE: The calculation of the calibration parameter M, which represents the maximum theoretically possible blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal increase, is an essential intermediate step in any calibrated fMRI experiment. To better compare M values obtained across different studies, it is common to scale M values from their original BOLD echo time (TE) to a different echo time according to the theory that M is directly proportional to TE. To the best of our knowledge, this relationship has never been directly tested. THEORY AND METHODS: A pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling sequence with five readouts (TE ranging from 20 to 78 ms) was implemented to test the relationship between M and TE, both with and without the application of flow crushing gradients. RESULTS: Both M and the BOLD signal were found to be linear functions of TE, but with a nonzero intercept. This intercept was reduced when crusher gradients were added, suggesting that the deviation from theory is a result of nonnegligible intravascular signal. CONCLUSION: The linear scaling method introduces some error when comparing M values acquired with different BOLD echo times. However, this error is small compared with other considerations, and would generally not preclude the continued use of this scaling method. Magn Reson Med 75:556–561, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-03-11 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4973822/ /pubmed/25761759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25603 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Imaging Methodology—Full Papers
Hare, Hannah V.
Bulte, Daniel P.
Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time
title Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time
title_full Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time
title_fullStr Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time
title_short Investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter M on echo time
title_sort investigating the dependence of the calibration parameter m on echo time
topic Imaging Methodology—Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25761759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25603
work_keys_str_mv AT harehannahv investigatingthedependenceofthecalibrationparametermonechotime
AT bultedanielp investigatingthedependenceofthecalibrationparametermonechotime