Cargando…

Disability Divides in India: Evidence from the 2011 Census

BACKGROUND: Understanding the socioeconomic and regional divides in disability prevalence in India has considerable relevance for designing public health policies and programs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to quantify the prevalence of disability by gender, region (rural and urban; st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saikia, Nandita, Bora, Jayanta Kumar, Jasilionis, Domantas, Shkolnikov, Vladimir M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27490469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159809
_version_ 1782446466045837312
author Saikia, Nandita
Bora, Jayanta Kumar
Jasilionis, Domantas
Shkolnikov, Vladimir M.
author_facet Saikia, Nandita
Bora, Jayanta Kumar
Jasilionis, Domantas
Shkolnikov, Vladimir M.
author_sort Saikia, Nandita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding the socioeconomic and regional divides in disability prevalence in India has considerable relevance for designing public health policies and programs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to quantify the prevalence of disability by gender, region (rural and urban; states and districts), and caste. We also examine the association between disability prevalence and the major socio-demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the districts in India. METHODS: Age-standardized disability prevalence (ASDP) was calculated using 2011 census data and applying the WHO World Standard Population. A regression analysis was carried out to examine the association between disability prevalence and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics across districts of India. RESULTS: The study found that ASDP varies substantially across districts and is higher among women, rural dwellers, and members of scheduled tribes (STs) and scheduled castes (SCs). The regression model showed that the disability rate in districts rises with increasing proportions of the population who are urban dwellers, aged 65 or older, members of STs, and living in dilapidated housing; and that the disability prevalence decreases with increasing proportions of the female population who are literate, and of the general population who are working and have access to safe drinking water. CONCLUSION: As the burden of disability falls disproportionately across geographic regions and socioeconomic groups, public health policies in India should take this variation into account. The definition of disability used in the census should be modified to generate internationally comparable estimates of disability prevalence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4973875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49738752016-08-18 Disability Divides in India: Evidence from the 2011 Census Saikia, Nandita Bora, Jayanta Kumar Jasilionis, Domantas Shkolnikov, Vladimir M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding the socioeconomic and regional divides in disability prevalence in India has considerable relevance for designing public health policies and programs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to quantify the prevalence of disability by gender, region (rural and urban; states and districts), and caste. We also examine the association between disability prevalence and the major socio-demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the districts in India. METHODS: Age-standardized disability prevalence (ASDP) was calculated using 2011 census data and applying the WHO World Standard Population. A regression analysis was carried out to examine the association between disability prevalence and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics across districts of India. RESULTS: The study found that ASDP varies substantially across districts and is higher among women, rural dwellers, and members of scheduled tribes (STs) and scheduled castes (SCs). The regression model showed that the disability rate in districts rises with increasing proportions of the population who are urban dwellers, aged 65 or older, members of STs, and living in dilapidated housing; and that the disability prevalence decreases with increasing proportions of the female population who are literate, and of the general population who are working and have access to safe drinking water. CONCLUSION: As the burden of disability falls disproportionately across geographic regions and socioeconomic groups, public health policies in India should take this variation into account. The definition of disability used in the census should be modified to generate internationally comparable estimates of disability prevalence. Public Library of Science 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4973875/ /pubmed/27490469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159809 Text en © 2016 Saikia et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saikia, Nandita
Bora, Jayanta Kumar
Jasilionis, Domantas
Shkolnikov, Vladimir M.
Disability Divides in India: Evidence from the 2011 Census
title Disability Divides in India: Evidence from the 2011 Census
title_full Disability Divides in India: Evidence from the 2011 Census
title_fullStr Disability Divides in India: Evidence from the 2011 Census
title_full_unstemmed Disability Divides in India: Evidence from the 2011 Census
title_short Disability Divides in India: Evidence from the 2011 Census
title_sort disability divides in india: evidence from the 2011 census
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27490469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159809
work_keys_str_mv AT saikianandita disabilitydividesinindiaevidencefromthe2011census
AT borajayantakumar disabilitydividesinindiaevidencefromthe2011census
AT jasilionisdomantas disabilitydividesinindiaevidencefromthe2011census
AT shkolnikovvladimirm disabilitydividesinindiaevidencefromthe2011census