Cargando…
Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research
INTRODUCTION: Translational research is central to international health policy, research and funding initiatives. Despite increasing use of the term, the translation of basic science discoveries into clinical practice is not straightforward. This systematic search and narrative synthesis aimed to ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27490373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160475 |
_version_ | 1782446471626358784 |
---|---|
author | Fudge, Nina Sadler, Euan Fisher, Helen R. Maher, John Wolfe, Charles D. A. McKevitt, Christopher |
author_facet | Fudge, Nina Sadler, Euan Fisher, Helen R. Maher, John Wolfe, Charles D. A. McKevitt, Christopher |
author_sort | Fudge, Nina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Translational research is central to international health policy, research and funding initiatives. Despite increasing use of the term, the translation of basic science discoveries into clinical practice is not straightforward. This systematic search and narrative synthesis aimed to examine factors enabling or hindering translational research from the perspective of basic and clinician scientists, a key stakeholder group in translational research, and to draw policy-relevant implications for organisations seeking to optimise translational research opportunities. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched SCOPUS and Web of Science from inception until April 2015 for papers reporting scientists’ views of the factors they perceive as enabling or hindering the conduct of translational research. We screened 8,295 papers from electronic database searches and 20 papers from hand searches and citation tracking, identifying 26 studies of qualitative, quantitative or mixed method designs. We used a narrative synthesis approach and identified the following themes: 1) differing concepts of translational research 2) research processes as a barrier to translational research; 3) perceived cultural divide between research and clinical care; 4) interdisciplinary collaboration as enabling translation research, but dependent on the quality of prior and current social relationships; 5) translational research as entrepreneurial science. Across all five themes, factors enabling or hindering translational research were largely shaped by wider social, organisational, and structural factors. CONCLUSION: To optimise translational research, policy could consider refining translational research models to better reflect scientists’ experiences, fostering greater collaboration and buy in from all types of scientists. Organisations could foster cultural change, ensuring that organisational practices and systems keep pace with the change in knowledge production brought about by the translational research agenda. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4973909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49739092016-08-18 Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research Fudge, Nina Sadler, Euan Fisher, Helen R. Maher, John Wolfe, Charles D. A. McKevitt, Christopher PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Translational research is central to international health policy, research and funding initiatives. Despite increasing use of the term, the translation of basic science discoveries into clinical practice is not straightforward. This systematic search and narrative synthesis aimed to examine factors enabling or hindering translational research from the perspective of basic and clinician scientists, a key stakeholder group in translational research, and to draw policy-relevant implications for organisations seeking to optimise translational research opportunities. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched SCOPUS and Web of Science from inception until April 2015 for papers reporting scientists’ views of the factors they perceive as enabling or hindering the conduct of translational research. We screened 8,295 papers from electronic database searches and 20 papers from hand searches and citation tracking, identifying 26 studies of qualitative, quantitative or mixed method designs. We used a narrative synthesis approach and identified the following themes: 1) differing concepts of translational research 2) research processes as a barrier to translational research; 3) perceived cultural divide between research and clinical care; 4) interdisciplinary collaboration as enabling translation research, but dependent on the quality of prior and current social relationships; 5) translational research as entrepreneurial science. Across all five themes, factors enabling or hindering translational research were largely shaped by wider social, organisational, and structural factors. CONCLUSION: To optimise translational research, policy could consider refining translational research models to better reflect scientists’ experiences, fostering greater collaboration and buy in from all types of scientists. Organisations could foster cultural change, ensuring that organisational practices and systems keep pace with the change in knowledge production brought about by the translational research agenda. Public Library of Science 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4973909/ /pubmed/27490373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160475 Text en © 2016 Fudge et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fudge, Nina Sadler, Euan Fisher, Helen R. Maher, John Wolfe, Charles D. A. McKevitt, Christopher Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research |
title | Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research |
title_full | Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research |
title_fullStr | Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research |
title_short | Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research |
title_sort | optimising translational research opportunities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of basic and clinician scientists' perspectives of factors which enable or hinder translational research |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27490373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160475 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fudgenina optimisingtranslationalresearchopportunitiesasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofbasicandclinicianscientistsperspectivesoffactorswhichenableorhindertranslationalresearch AT sadlereuan optimisingtranslationalresearchopportunitiesasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofbasicandclinicianscientistsperspectivesoffactorswhichenableorhindertranslationalresearch AT fisherhelenr optimisingtranslationalresearchopportunitiesasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofbasicandclinicianscientistsperspectivesoffactorswhichenableorhindertranslationalresearch AT maherjohn optimisingtranslationalresearchopportunitiesasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofbasicandclinicianscientistsperspectivesoffactorswhichenableorhindertranslationalresearch AT wolfecharlesda optimisingtranslationalresearchopportunitiesasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofbasicandclinicianscientistsperspectivesoffactorswhichenableorhindertranslationalresearch AT mckevittchristopher optimisingtranslationalresearchopportunitiesasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofbasicandclinicianscientistsperspectivesoffactorswhichenableorhindertranslationalresearch |