Cargando…

Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research

INTRODUCTION: Translational research is central to international health policy, research and funding initiatives. Despite increasing use of the term, the translation of basic science discoveries into clinical practice is not straightforward. This systematic search and narrative synthesis aimed to ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fudge, Nina, Sadler, Euan, Fisher, Helen R., Maher, John, Wolfe, Charles D. A., McKevitt, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27490373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160475
_version_ 1782446471626358784
author Fudge, Nina
Sadler, Euan
Fisher, Helen R.
Maher, John
Wolfe, Charles D. A.
McKevitt, Christopher
author_facet Fudge, Nina
Sadler, Euan
Fisher, Helen R.
Maher, John
Wolfe, Charles D. A.
McKevitt, Christopher
author_sort Fudge, Nina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Translational research is central to international health policy, research and funding initiatives. Despite increasing use of the term, the translation of basic science discoveries into clinical practice is not straightforward. This systematic search and narrative synthesis aimed to examine factors enabling or hindering translational research from the perspective of basic and clinician scientists, a key stakeholder group in translational research, and to draw policy-relevant implications for organisations seeking to optimise translational research opportunities. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched SCOPUS and Web of Science from inception until April 2015 for papers reporting scientists’ views of the factors they perceive as enabling or hindering the conduct of translational research. We screened 8,295 papers from electronic database searches and 20 papers from hand searches and citation tracking, identifying 26 studies of qualitative, quantitative or mixed method designs. We used a narrative synthesis approach and identified the following themes: 1) differing concepts of translational research 2) research processes as a barrier to translational research; 3) perceived cultural divide between research and clinical care; 4) interdisciplinary collaboration as enabling translation research, but dependent on the quality of prior and current social relationships; 5) translational research as entrepreneurial science. Across all five themes, factors enabling or hindering translational research were largely shaped by wider social, organisational, and structural factors. CONCLUSION: To optimise translational research, policy could consider refining translational research models to better reflect scientists’ experiences, fostering greater collaboration and buy in from all types of scientists. Organisations could foster cultural change, ensuring that organisational practices and systems keep pace with the change in knowledge production brought about by the translational research agenda.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4973909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49739092016-08-18 Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research Fudge, Nina Sadler, Euan Fisher, Helen R. Maher, John Wolfe, Charles D. A. McKevitt, Christopher PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Translational research is central to international health policy, research and funding initiatives. Despite increasing use of the term, the translation of basic science discoveries into clinical practice is not straightforward. This systematic search and narrative synthesis aimed to examine factors enabling or hindering translational research from the perspective of basic and clinician scientists, a key stakeholder group in translational research, and to draw policy-relevant implications for organisations seeking to optimise translational research opportunities. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched SCOPUS and Web of Science from inception until April 2015 for papers reporting scientists’ views of the factors they perceive as enabling or hindering the conduct of translational research. We screened 8,295 papers from electronic database searches and 20 papers from hand searches and citation tracking, identifying 26 studies of qualitative, quantitative or mixed method designs. We used a narrative synthesis approach and identified the following themes: 1) differing concepts of translational research 2) research processes as a barrier to translational research; 3) perceived cultural divide between research and clinical care; 4) interdisciplinary collaboration as enabling translation research, but dependent on the quality of prior and current social relationships; 5) translational research as entrepreneurial science. Across all five themes, factors enabling or hindering translational research were largely shaped by wider social, organisational, and structural factors. CONCLUSION: To optimise translational research, policy could consider refining translational research models to better reflect scientists’ experiences, fostering greater collaboration and buy in from all types of scientists. Organisations could foster cultural change, ensuring that organisational practices and systems keep pace with the change in knowledge production brought about by the translational research agenda. Public Library of Science 2016-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4973909/ /pubmed/27490373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160475 Text en © 2016 Fudge et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fudge, Nina
Sadler, Euan
Fisher, Helen R.
Maher, John
Wolfe, Charles D. A.
McKevitt, Christopher
Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research
title Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research
title_full Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research
title_fullStr Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research
title_full_unstemmed Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research
title_short Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research
title_sort optimising translational research opportunities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of basic and clinician scientists' perspectives of factors which enable or hinder translational research
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27490373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160475
work_keys_str_mv AT fudgenina optimisingtranslationalresearchopportunitiesasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofbasicandclinicianscientistsperspectivesoffactorswhichenableorhindertranslationalresearch
AT sadlereuan optimisingtranslationalresearchopportunitiesasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofbasicandclinicianscientistsperspectivesoffactorswhichenableorhindertranslationalresearch
AT fisherhelenr optimisingtranslationalresearchopportunitiesasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofbasicandclinicianscientistsperspectivesoffactorswhichenableorhindertranslationalresearch
AT maherjohn optimisingtranslationalresearchopportunitiesasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofbasicandclinicianscientistsperspectivesoffactorswhichenableorhindertranslationalresearch
AT wolfecharlesda optimisingtranslationalresearchopportunitiesasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofbasicandclinicianscientistsperspectivesoffactorswhichenableorhindertranslationalresearch
AT mckevittchristopher optimisingtranslationalresearchopportunitiesasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesisofbasicandclinicianscientistsperspectivesoffactorswhichenableorhindertranslationalresearch