Cargando…

Is the size of the acetabular bone lesion a predictive factor for failure in revisions of total hip arthroplasty using an impacted allograft?()

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the acetabular bone lesion size (in millimeters) from which impacted bone graft failure starts to occur more frequently, through simple anteroposterior hip radiographs, and whether measurement of the defect on simple radiographs maintains the same pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guimarães, Rodrigo Pereira, Yonamine, Alexandre Maris, Faria, Carlos Eduardo Nunes, Rudelli, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27517019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2015.09.015
_version_ 1782446504463564800
author Guimarães, Rodrigo Pereira
Yonamine, Alexandre Maris
Faria, Carlos Eduardo Nunes
Rudelli, Marco
author_facet Guimarães, Rodrigo Pereira
Yonamine, Alexandre Maris
Faria, Carlos Eduardo Nunes
Rudelli, Marco
author_sort Guimarães, Rodrigo Pereira
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the acetabular bone lesion size (in millimeters) from which impacted bone graft failure starts to occur more frequently, through simple anteroposterior hip radiographs, and whether measurement of the defect on simple radiographs maintains the same pattern in inter and intraobserver assessments. METHODS: Thirty-eight anteroposterior pelvic-view radiographs from patients undergoing revision of an acetabular prosthesis were retrospectively analyzed and assessed. In the vertical plane, the bilacrimal line was measured in millimeters from the farthest point found on the bone edge of the acetabular osteolysis to the top edge of the cementation or of the acetabular implant in uncemented cases. The base was taken to be a line perpendicular to bilacrimal line, with the aim of eliminating any pelvic tilt effects. This measurement was named the vertical size of failure. Radiographs produced four years after the operation were analyzed to investigate any failure of the technique. RESULTS: The graft failure rate in the study group was 26.3%. The failures occurred in cases with an initial bone defect larger than 11 mm. No cases with measurements smaller than this evolved with failure of the revision. The highest incidence of graft failure occurred in cases described as advanced according to the “Paprosky” classification. CONCLUSION: Failure of acetabular revision arthroplasty using an impacted graft did not present any statistically significant correlation with the vertical extent of the lesion on simple anteroposterior radiographs, as a predictor of treatment failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4974165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49741652016-08-11 Is the size of the acetabular bone lesion a predictive factor for failure in revisions of total hip arthroplasty using an impacted allograft?() Guimarães, Rodrigo Pereira Yonamine, Alexandre Maris Faria, Carlos Eduardo Nunes Rudelli, Marco Rev Bras Ortop Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the acetabular bone lesion size (in millimeters) from which impacted bone graft failure starts to occur more frequently, through simple anteroposterior hip radiographs, and whether measurement of the defect on simple radiographs maintains the same pattern in inter and intraobserver assessments. METHODS: Thirty-eight anteroposterior pelvic-view radiographs from patients undergoing revision of an acetabular prosthesis were retrospectively analyzed and assessed. In the vertical plane, the bilacrimal line was measured in millimeters from the farthest point found on the bone edge of the acetabular osteolysis to the top edge of the cementation or of the acetabular implant in uncemented cases. The base was taken to be a line perpendicular to bilacrimal line, with the aim of eliminating any pelvic tilt effects. This measurement was named the vertical size of failure. Radiographs produced four years after the operation were analyzed to investigate any failure of the technique. RESULTS: The graft failure rate in the study group was 26.3%. The failures occurred in cases with an initial bone defect larger than 11 mm. No cases with measurements smaller than this evolved with failure of the revision. The highest incidence of graft failure occurred in cases described as advanced according to the “Paprosky” classification. CONCLUSION: Failure of acetabular revision arthroplasty using an impacted graft did not present any statistically significant correlation with the vertical extent of the lesion on simple anteroposterior radiographs, as a predictor of treatment failure. Elsevier 2016-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4974165/ /pubmed/27517019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2015.09.015 Text en © 2016 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. on behalf of Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopediae Traumatologia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Guimarães, Rodrigo Pereira
Yonamine, Alexandre Maris
Faria, Carlos Eduardo Nunes
Rudelli, Marco
Is the size of the acetabular bone lesion a predictive factor for failure in revisions of total hip arthroplasty using an impacted allograft?()
title Is the size of the acetabular bone lesion a predictive factor for failure in revisions of total hip arthroplasty using an impacted allograft?()
title_full Is the size of the acetabular bone lesion a predictive factor for failure in revisions of total hip arthroplasty using an impacted allograft?()
title_fullStr Is the size of the acetabular bone lesion a predictive factor for failure in revisions of total hip arthroplasty using an impacted allograft?()
title_full_unstemmed Is the size of the acetabular bone lesion a predictive factor for failure in revisions of total hip arthroplasty using an impacted allograft?()
title_short Is the size of the acetabular bone lesion a predictive factor for failure in revisions of total hip arthroplasty using an impacted allograft?()
title_sort is the size of the acetabular bone lesion a predictive factor for failure in revisions of total hip arthroplasty using an impacted allograft?()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27517019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2015.09.015
work_keys_str_mv AT guimaraesrodrigopereira isthesizeoftheacetabularbonelesionapredictivefactorforfailureinrevisionsoftotalhiparthroplastyusinganimpactedallograft
AT yonaminealexandremaris isthesizeoftheacetabularbonelesionapredictivefactorforfailureinrevisionsoftotalhiparthroplastyusinganimpactedallograft
AT fariacarloseduardonunes isthesizeoftheacetabularbonelesionapredictivefactorforfailureinrevisionsoftotalhiparthroplastyusinganimpactedallograft
AT rudellimarco isthesizeoftheacetabularbonelesionapredictivefactorforfailureinrevisionsoftotalhiparthroplastyusinganimpactedallograft