Cargando…
Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET and chest CT: validation of an algorithm
In patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and high-risk factors, the combination of whole body FDG-PET and contrast-enhanced chest CT has the highest sensitivity and accuracy when screening for distant metastases. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively validate an earlier d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26350882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3773-8 |
Sumario: | In patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and high-risk factors, the combination of whole body FDG-PET and contrast-enhanced chest CT has the highest sensitivity and accuracy when screening for distant metastases. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively validate an earlier developed algorithm for interpreting the combination of screening PET and CT. The test cohort consisted of 47 consecutive HNSCC patients with high-risk factors for distant metastases, who had previously undergone FDG-PET and CT and had a minimum 12 months of follow-up. In 12 (26 %) patients, distant metastases were detected during screening or within 12-month follow-up. In patients with locoregional control during follow-up, the sensitivity and specificity were 55 % (95 % CI 23–83 %) and 97 % (95 % CI 82–99 %), respectively, for chest CT, 55 % (95 % CI 23–83 %) and 100 % (95 % CI 88–100 %), respectively, for PET and 73 % (95 % CI 39–94 %) and 100 % (95 % CI 88–100 %), respectively, for the combination of PET and CT. The proposed algorithm was considered to have been validated. In this algorithm, all FDG-PET positive scans for distant metastases (regardless of interpretation of a solid lung lesion on CT) and CT scans with suspicious pulmonary lesions of less than 5-mm diameter (regardless of FDG-PET findings) are considered positive for distant metastases. |
---|