Cargando…
Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET and chest CT: validation of an algorithm
In patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and high-risk factors, the combination of whole body FDG-PET and contrast-enhanced chest CT has the highest sensitivity and accuracy when screening for distant metastases. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively validate an earlier d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26350882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3773-8 |
_version_ | 1782446524605661184 |
---|---|
author | Senft, Asaf Hoekstra, Otto S. Witte, Birgit I. Leemans, C. René de Bree, Remco |
author_facet | Senft, Asaf Hoekstra, Otto S. Witte, Birgit I. Leemans, C. René de Bree, Remco |
author_sort | Senft, Asaf |
collection | PubMed |
description | In patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and high-risk factors, the combination of whole body FDG-PET and contrast-enhanced chest CT has the highest sensitivity and accuracy when screening for distant metastases. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively validate an earlier developed algorithm for interpreting the combination of screening PET and CT. The test cohort consisted of 47 consecutive HNSCC patients with high-risk factors for distant metastases, who had previously undergone FDG-PET and CT and had a minimum 12 months of follow-up. In 12 (26 %) patients, distant metastases were detected during screening or within 12-month follow-up. In patients with locoregional control during follow-up, the sensitivity and specificity were 55 % (95 % CI 23–83 %) and 97 % (95 % CI 82–99 %), respectively, for chest CT, 55 % (95 % CI 23–83 %) and 100 % (95 % CI 88–100 %), respectively, for PET and 73 % (95 % CI 39–94 %) and 100 % (95 % CI 88–100 %), respectively, for the combination of PET and CT. The proposed algorithm was considered to have been validated. In this algorithm, all FDG-PET positive scans for distant metastases (regardless of interpretation of a solid lung lesion on CT) and CT scans with suspicious pulmonary lesions of less than 5-mm diameter (regardless of FDG-PET findings) are considered positive for distant metastases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4974282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49742822016-08-17 Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET and chest CT: validation of an algorithm Senft, Asaf Hoekstra, Otto S. Witte, Birgit I. Leemans, C. René de Bree, Remco Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck In patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and high-risk factors, the combination of whole body FDG-PET and contrast-enhanced chest CT has the highest sensitivity and accuracy when screening for distant metastases. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively validate an earlier developed algorithm for interpreting the combination of screening PET and CT. The test cohort consisted of 47 consecutive HNSCC patients with high-risk factors for distant metastases, who had previously undergone FDG-PET and CT and had a minimum 12 months of follow-up. In 12 (26 %) patients, distant metastases were detected during screening or within 12-month follow-up. In patients with locoregional control during follow-up, the sensitivity and specificity were 55 % (95 % CI 23–83 %) and 97 % (95 % CI 82–99 %), respectively, for chest CT, 55 % (95 % CI 23–83 %) and 100 % (95 % CI 88–100 %), respectively, for PET and 73 % (95 % CI 39–94 %) and 100 % (95 % CI 88–100 %), respectively, for the combination of PET and CT. The proposed algorithm was considered to have been validated. In this algorithm, all FDG-PET positive scans for distant metastases (regardless of interpretation of a solid lung lesion on CT) and CT scans with suspicious pulmonary lesions of less than 5-mm diameter (regardless of FDG-PET findings) are considered positive for distant metastases. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-09-09 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4974282/ /pubmed/26350882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3773-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck Senft, Asaf Hoekstra, Otto S. Witte, Birgit I. Leemans, C. René de Bree, Remco Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET and chest CT: validation of an algorithm |
title | Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET and chest CT: validation of an algorithm |
title_full | Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET and chest CT: validation of an algorithm |
title_fullStr | Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET and chest CT: validation of an algorithm |
title_full_unstemmed | Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET and chest CT: validation of an algorithm |
title_short | Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients using FDG-PET and chest CT: validation of an algorithm |
title_sort | screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients using fdg-pet and chest ct: validation of an algorithm |
topic | Head and Neck |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26350882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3773-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT senftasaf screeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatientsusingfdgpetandchestctvalidationofanalgorithm AT hoekstraottos screeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatientsusingfdgpetandchestctvalidationofanalgorithm AT wittebirgiti screeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatientsusingfdgpetandchestctvalidationofanalgorithm AT leemanscrene screeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatientsusingfdgpetandchestctvalidationofanalgorithm AT debreeremco screeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatientsusingfdgpetandchestctvalidationofanalgorithm |