Cargando…

Zenker’s diverticulum: Rotterdam experience

Different surgical techniques exist for the treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD), of which minimally invasive techniques have become the standard. We reviewed our experience with management and treatment of ZD and sought to determine what type of treatment is most effective and efficient. We sele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Visser, L. J., Hardillo, J. A. U., Monserez, D. A., Wieringa, M. H., Baatenburg de Jong, R. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3825-0
_version_ 1782446525272555520
author Visser, L. J.
Hardillo, J. A. U.
Monserez, D. A.
Wieringa, M. H.
Baatenburg de Jong, R. J.
author_facet Visser, L. J.
Hardillo, J. A. U.
Monserez, D. A.
Wieringa, M. H.
Baatenburg de Jong, R. J.
author_sort Visser, L. J.
collection PubMed
description Different surgical techniques exist for the treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD), of which minimally invasive techniques have become the standard. We reviewed our experience with management and treatment of ZD and sought to determine what type of treatment is most effective and efficient. We selected patients who underwent treatment for ZD between January 2004 and January 2014 at our tertiary referral center. All procedures were performed by ENT surgeons. The medical records were reviewed for pre- and intraoperative characteristics and follow-up. Of our 94 patients (58 male, 36 female), 75 underwent endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy (42 stapler, 33 laser) and 6 received treatment via transcervical approach. 13 interventions were aborted. Mean operating time was 49.0 min for stapler, 68.3 for laser and 124.0 for the transcervical approach. Its respective median post-operative admission durations were 2.0, 3.0 and 3.0 days. After the first treatment, of the 75 endoscopic procedures, 45 patients (23 stapler, 22 laser) had complete symptom resolution. In the transcervical group 4 (67 %) patients were symptom free and one patient died of complications. In the endoscopically treated patients, ten complications occurred, of which 8 G1 and 2 G2 (Clavien Dindo classification). In the transcervical group 2 complications occurred, 1 G3b and 1 G5. Both endoscopic techniques provide efficient management of Zenker’s diverticulum with the stapler-assisted modality providing a shorter surgery duration and hospital admission. Although there is no significant difference in terms of complications or recurrence rates for both endoscopic techniques, it seems that stapler patients are at higher risk of having a re-intervention and of having more severe complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4974285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49742852016-08-17 Zenker’s diverticulum: Rotterdam experience Visser, L. J. Hardillo, J. A. U. Monserez, D. A. Wieringa, M. H. Baatenburg de Jong, R. J. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck Different surgical techniques exist for the treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD), of which minimally invasive techniques have become the standard. We reviewed our experience with management and treatment of ZD and sought to determine what type of treatment is most effective and efficient. We selected patients who underwent treatment for ZD between January 2004 and January 2014 at our tertiary referral center. All procedures were performed by ENT surgeons. The medical records were reviewed for pre- and intraoperative characteristics and follow-up. Of our 94 patients (58 male, 36 female), 75 underwent endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy (42 stapler, 33 laser) and 6 received treatment via transcervical approach. 13 interventions were aborted. Mean operating time was 49.0 min for stapler, 68.3 for laser and 124.0 for the transcervical approach. Its respective median post-operative admission durations were 2.0, 3.0 and 3.0 days. After the first treatment, of the 75 endoscopic procedures, 45 patients (23 stapler, 22 laser) had complete symptom resolution. In the transcervical group 4 (67 %) patients were symptom free and one patient died of complications. In the endoscopically treated patients, ten complications occurred, of which 8 G1 and 2 G2 (Clavien Dindo classification). In the transcervical group 2 complications occurred, 1 G3b and 1 G5. Both endoscopic techniques provide efficient management of Zenker’s diverticulum with the stapler-assisted modality providing a shorter surgery duration and hospital admission. Although there is no significant difference in terms of complications or recurrence rates for both endoscopic techniques, it seems that stapler patients are at higher risk of having a re-intervention and of having more severe complications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-17 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4974285/ /pubmed/26576954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3825-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Head and Neck
Visser, L. J.
Hardillo, J. A. U.
Monserez, D. A.
Wieringa, M. H.
Baatenburg de Jong, R. J.
Zenker’s diverticulum: Rotterdam experience
title Zenker’s diverticulum: Rotterdam experience
title_full Zenker’s diverticulum: Rotterdam experience
title_fullStr Zenker’s diverticulum: Rotterdam experience
title_full_unstemmed Zenker’s diverticulum: Rotterdam experience
title_short Zenker’s diverticulum: Rotterdam experience
title_sort zenker’s diverticulum: rotterdam experience
topic Head and Neck
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26576954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3825-0
work_keys_str_mv AT visserlj zenkersdiverticulumrotterdamexperience
AT hardillojau zenkersdiverticulumrotterdamexperience
AT monserezda zenkersdiverticulumrotterdamexperience
AT wieringamh zenkersdiverticulumrotterdamexperience
AT baatenburgdejongrj zenkersdiverticulumrotterdamexperience