Cargando…

Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide

Protected areas are widely considered essential for biodiversity conservation. However, few global studies have demonstrated that protection benefits a broad range of species. Here, using a new global biodiversity database with unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage, we compare four biodive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gray, Claudia L., Hill, Samantha L. L., Newbold, Tim, Hudson, Lawrence N., Börger, Luca, Contu, Sara, Hoskins, Andrew J., Ferrier, Simon, Purvis, Andy, Scharlemann, Jörn P. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12306
_version_ 1782446550495002624
author Gray, Claudia L.
Hill, Samantha L. L.
Newbold, Tim
Hudson, Lawrence N.
Börger, Luca
Contu, Sara
Hoskins, Andrew J.
Ferrier, Simon
Purvis, Andy
Scharlemann, Jörn P. W.
author_facet Gray, Claudia L.
Hill, Samantha L. L.
Newbold, Tim
Hudson, Lawrence N.
Börger, Luca
Contu, Sara
Hoskins, Andrew J.
Ferrier, Simon
Purvis, Andy
Scharlemann, Jörn P. W.
author_sort Gray, Claudia L.
collection PubMed
description Protected areas are widely considered essential for biodiversity conservation. However, few global studies have demonstrated that protection benefits a broad range of species. Here, using a new global biodiversity database with unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage, we compare four biodiversity measures at sites sampled in multiple land uses inside and outside protected areas. Globally, species richness is 10.6% higher and abundance 14.5% higher in samples taken inside protected areas compared with samples taken outside, but neither rarefaction-based richness nor endemicity differ significantly. Importantly, we show that the positive effects of protection are mostly attributable to differences in land use between protected and unprotected sites. Nonetheless, even within some human-dominated land uses, species richness and abundance are higher in protected sites. Our results reinforce the global importance of protected areas but suggest that protection does not consistently benefit species with small ranges or increase the variety of ecological niches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4974472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49744722016-08-18 Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide Gray, Claudia L. Hill, Samantha L. L. Newbold, Tim Hudson, Lawrence N. Börger, Luca Contu, Sara Hoskins, Andrew J. Ferrier, Simon Purvis, Andy Scharlemann, Jörn P. W. Nat Commun Article Protected areas are widely considered essential for biodiversity conservation. However, few global studies have demonstrated that protection benefits a broad range of species. Here, using a new global biodiversity database with unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage, we compare four biodiversity measures at sites sampled in multiple land uses inside and outside protected areas. Globally, species richness is 10.6% higher and abundance 14.5% higher in samples taken inside protected areas compared with samples taken outside, but neither rarefaction-based richness nor endemicity differ significantly. Importantly, we show that the positive effects of protection are mostly attributable to differences in land use between protected and unprotected sites. Nonetheless, even within some human-dominated land uses, species richness and abundance are higher in protected sites. Our results reinforce the global importance of protected areas but suggest that protection does not consistently benefit species with small ranges or increase the variety of ecological niches. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4974472/ /pubmed/27465407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12306 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Gray, Claudia L.
Hill, Samantha L. L.
Newbold, Tim
Hudson, Lawrence N.
Börger, Luca
Contu, Sara
Hoskins, Andrew J.
Ferrier, Simon
Purvis, Andy
Scharlemann, Jörn P. W.
Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
title Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
title_full Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
title_fullStr Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
title_full_unstemmed Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
title_short Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
title_sort local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12306
work_keys_str_mv AT grayclaudial localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide
AT hillsamanthall localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide
AT newboldtim localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide
AT hudsonlawrencen localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide
AT borgerluca localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide
AT contusara localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide
AT hoskinsandrewj localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide
AT ferriersimon localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide
AT purvisandy localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide
AT scharlemannjornpw localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide