Cargando…
Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide
Protected areas are widely considered essential for biodiversity conservation. However, few global studies have demonstrated that protection benefits a broad range of species. Here, using a new global biodiversity database with unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage, we compare four biodive...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12306 |
_version_ | 1782446550495002624 |
---|---|
author | Gray, Claudia L. Hill, Samantha L. L. Newbold, Tim Hudson, Lawrence N. Börger, Luca Contu, Sara Hoskins, Andrew J. Ferrier, Simon Purvis, Andy Scharlemann, Jörn P. W. |
author_facet | Gray, Claudia L. Hill, Samantha L. L. Newbold, Tim Hudson, Lawrence N. Börger, Luca Contu, Sara Hoskins, Andrew J. Ferrier, Simon Purvis, Andy Scharlemann, Jörn P. W. |
author_sort | Gray, Claudia L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protected areas are widely considered essential for biodiversity conservation. However, few global studies have demonstrated that protection benefits a broad range of species. Here, using a new global biodiversity database with unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage, we compare four biodiversity measures at sites sampled in multiple land uses inside and outside protected areas. Globally, species richness is 10.6% higher and abundance 14.5% higher in samples taken inside protected areas compared with samples taken outside, but neither rarefaction-based richness nor endemicity differ significantly. Importantly, we show that the positive effects of protection are mostly attributable to differences in land use between protected and unprotected sites. Nonetheless, even within some human-dominated land uses, species richness and abundance are higher in protected sites. Our results reinforce the global importance of protected areas but suggest that protection does not consistently benefit species with small ranges or increase the variety of ecological niches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4974472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49744722016-08-18 Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide Gray, Claudia L. Hill, Samantha L. L. Newbold, Tim Hudson, Lawrence N. Börger, Luca Contu, Sara Hoskins, Andrew J. Ferrier, Simon Purvis, Andy Scharlemann, Jörn P. W. Nat Commun Article Protected areas are widely considered essential for biodiversity conservation. However, few global studies have demonstrated that protection benefits a broad range of species. Here, using a new global biodiversity database with unprecedented geographic and taxonomic coverage, we compare four biodiversity measures at sites sampled in multiple land uses inside and outside protected areas. Globally, species richness is 10.6% higher and abundance 14.5% higher in samples taken inside protected areas compared with samples taken outside, but neither rarefaction-based richness nor endemicity differ significantly. Importantly, we show that the positive effects of protection are mostly attributable to differences in land use between protected and unprotected sites. Nonetheless, even within some human-dominated land uses, species richness and abundance are higher in protected sites. Our results reinforce the global importance of protected areas but suggest that protection does not consistently benefit species with small ranges or increase the variety of ecological niches. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4974472/ /pubmed/27465407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12306 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Gray, Claudia L. Hill, Samantha L. L. Newbold, Tim Hudson, Lawrence N. Börger, Luca Contu, Sara Hoskins, Andrew J. Ferrier, Simon Purvis, Andy Scharlemann, Jörn P. W. Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide |
title | Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide |
title_full | Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide |
title_fullStr | Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide |
title_full_unstemmed | Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide |
title_short | Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide |
title_sort | local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grayclaudial localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide AT hillsamanthall localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide AT newboldtim localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide AT hudsonlawrencen localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide AT borgerluca localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide AT contusara localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide AT hoskinsandrewj localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide AT ferriersimon localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide AT purvisandy localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide AT scharlemannjornpw localbiodiversityishigherinsidethanoutsideterrestrialprotectedareasworldwide |