Cargando…

Sex difference in appropriate shocks but not mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

AIMS: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to improve survival, although a considerable number of patients never receive therapy. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are routinely implanted regardless of sex. There is continuing controversy whether major outcomes differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seegers, Joachim, Conen, David, Jung, Klaus, Bergau, Leonard, Dorenkamp, Marc, Lüthje, Lars, Sohns, Christian, Sossalla, Samuel T., Fischer, Thomas H., Hasenfuss, Gerd, Friede, Tim, Zabel, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26622054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv361
_version_ 1782446578205720576
author Seegers, Joachim
Conen, David
Jung, Klaus
Bergau, Leonard
Dorenkamp, Marc
Lüthje, Lars
Sohns, Christian
Sossalla, Samuel T.
Fischer, Thomas H.
Hasenfuss, Gerd
Friede, Tim
Zabel, Markus
author_facet Seegers, Joachim
Conen, David
Jung, Klaus
Bergau, Leonard
Dorenkamp, Marc
Lüthje, Lars
Sohns, Christian
Sossalla, Samuel T.
Fischer, Thomas H.
Hasenfuss, Gerd
Friede, Tim
Zabel, Markus
author_sort Seegers, Joachim
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to improve survival, although a considerable number of patients never receive therapy. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are routinely implanted regardless of sex. There is continuing controversy whether major outcomes differ between men and women. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective single-centre study, 1151 consecutive patients (19% women) undergoing ICD implantation between 1998 and 2010 were followed for mortality and first appropriate ICD shock over 4.9 ± 2.7 years. Sex-related differences were investigated using multivariable Cox models adjusting for potential confounders. During follow-up, 318 patients died, a rate of 5.9% per year among men and 4.6% among women (uncorrected P = 0.08); 266 patients received a first appropriate ICD shock (6.3% per year among men vs. 3.6% among women, P = 0.002). After multivariate correction, independent predictors of all-cause mortality were age (hazard ratio, HR = 1.04 per year of age, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.03–1.06], P < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (HR = 0.98 per %, 95% CI [0.97–1.00], P = 0.025), renal function (HR = 0.99 per mL/min/1.73 m(2), 95% CI [0.99–1.00], P = 0.009), use of diuretics (HR = 1.81, 95% CI [1.29–2.54], P = 0.0023), peripheral arterial disease (HR = 2.21, 95% CI [1.62–3.00], P < 0.001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR = 1.48, 95% CI [1.13–1.94], P = 0.029), but not sex. Female sex (HR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.33–0.81], P = 0.013), older age (HR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.97–0.99], P < 0.001), and primary prophylactic ICD indication (HR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.52–0.93], P = 0.043) were independent predictors for less appropriate shocks. CONCLUSION: Women receive 50% less appropriate shocks than men having similar mortality in this large single-centre population. These data may pertain to individually improved selection of defibrillator candidates using risk factors, e.g. sex as demonstrated in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4974631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49746312016-08-09 Sex difference in appropriate shocks but not mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators Seegers, Joachim Conen, David Jung, Klaus Bergau, Leonard Dorenkamp, Marc Lüthje, Lars Sohns, Christian Sossalla, Samuel T. Fischer, Thomas H. Hasenfuss, Gerd Friede, Tim Zabel, Markus Europace CLINICAL RESEARCH AIMS: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to improve survival, although a considerable number of patients never receive therapy. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are routinely implanted regardless of sex. There is continuing controversy whether major outcomes differ between men and women. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective single-centre study, 1151 consecutive patients (19% women) undergoing ICD implantation between 1998 and 2010 were followed for mortality and first appropriate ICD shock over 4.9 ± 2.7 years. Sex-related differences were investigated using multivariable Cox models adjusting for potential confounders. During follow-up, 318 patients died, a rate of 5.9% per year among men and 4.6% among women (uncorrected P = 0.08); 266 patients received a first appropriate ICD shock (6.3% per year among men vs. 3.6% among women, P = 0.002). After multivariate correction, independent predictors of all-cause mortality were age (hazard ratio, HR = 1.04 per year of age, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.03–1.06], P < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (HR = 0.98 per %, 95% CI [0.97–1.00], P = 0.025), renal function (HR = 0.99 per mL/min/1.73 m(2), 95% CI [0.99–1.00], P = 0.009), use of diuretics (HR = 1.81, 95% CI [1.29–2.54], P = 0.0023), peripheral arterial disease (HR = 2.21, 95% CI [1.62–3.00], P < 0.001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR = 1.48, 95% CI [1.13–1.94], P = 0.029), but not sex. Female sex (HR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.33–0.81], P = 0.013), older age (HR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.97–0.99], P < 0.001), and primary prophylactic ICD indication (HR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.52–0.93], P = 0.043) were independent predictors for less appropriate shocks. CONCLUSION: Women receive 50% less appropriate shocks than men having similar mortality in this large single-centre population. These data may pertain to individually improved selection of defibrillator candidates using risk factors, e.g. sex as demonstrated in this study. Oxford University Press 2016-08 2015-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4974631/ /pubmed/26622054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv361 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle CLINICAL RESEARCH
Seegers, Joachim
Conen, David
Jung, Klaus
Bergau, Leonard
Dorenkamp, Marc
Lüthje, Lars
Sohns, Christian
Sossalla, Samuel T.
Fischer, Thomas H.
Hasenfuss, Gerd
Friede, Tim
Zabel, Markus
Sex difference in appropriate shocks but not mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
title Sex difference in appropriate shocks but not mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
title_full Sex difference in appropriate shocks but not mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
title_fullStr Sex difference in appropriate shocks but not mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
title_full_unstemmed Sex difference in appropriate shocks but not mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
title_short Sex difference in appropriate shocks but not mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
title_sort sex difference in appropriate shocks but not mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
topic CLINICAL RESEARCH
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26622054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv361
work_keys_str_mv AT seegersjoachim sexdifferenceinappropriateshocksbutnotmortalityduringlongtermfollowupinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT conendavid sexdifferenceinappropriateshocksbutnotmortalityduringlongtermfollowupinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT jungklaus sexdifferenceinappropriateshocksbutnotmortalityduringlongtermfollowupinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT bergauleonard sexdifferenceinappropriateshocksbutnotmortalityduringlongtermfollowupinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT dorenkampmarc sexdifferenceinappropriateshocksbutnotmortalityduringlongtermfollowupinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT luthjelars sexdifferenceinappropriateshocksbutnotmortalityduringlongtermfollowupinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT sohnschristian sexdifferenceinappropriateshocksbutnotmortalityduringlongtermfollowupinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT sossallasamuelt sexdifferenceinappropriateshocksbutnotmortalityduringlongtermfollowupinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT fischerthomash sexdifferenceinappropriateshocksbutnotmortalityduringlongtermfollowupinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT hasenfussgerd sexdifferenceinappropriateshocksbutnotmortalityduringlongtermfollowupinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT friedetim sexdifferenceinappropriateshocksbutnotmortalityduringlongtermfollowupinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators
AT zabelmarkus sexdifferenceinappropriateshocksbutnotmortalityduringlongtermfollowupinpatientswithimplantablecardioverterdefibrillators