Cargando…

The validity of a professional competence tool for physiotherapy students in simulation-based clinical education: a Rasch analysis

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent widespread adoption of simulation in clinical education in physiotherapy, there is a lack of validated tools for assessment in this setting. The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is a comprehensive tool used in clinical placement settings in Australia to measu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Judd, Belinda K., Scanlan, Justin N., Alison, Jennifer A., Waters, Donna, Gordon, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27492325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0718-x
_version_ 1782446591376883712
author Judd, Belinda K.
Scanlan, Justin N.
Alison, Jennifer A.
Waters, Donna
Gordon, Christopher J.
author_facet Judd, Belinda K.
Scanlan, Justin N.
Alison, Jennifer A.
Waters, Donna
Gordon, Christopher J.
author_sort Judd, Belinda K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the recent widespread adoption of simulation in clinical education in physiotherapy, there is a lack of validated tools for assessment in this setting. The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is a comprehensive tool used in clinical placement settings in Australia to measure professional competence of physiotherapy students. The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity of the APP for student assessment in simulation settings. METHODS: A total of 1260 APPs were collected, 971 from students in simulation and 289 from students in clinical placements. Rasch analysis was used to examine the construct validity of the APP tool in three different simulation assessment formats: longitudinal assessment over 1 week of simulation; longitudinal assessment over 2 weeks; and a short-form (25 min) assessment of a single simulation scenario. Comparison with APPs from 5 week clinical placements in hospital and clinic-based settings were also conducted. RESULTS: The APP demonstrated acceptable fit to the expectations of the Rasch model for the 1 and 2 week clinical simulations, exhibiting unidimensional properties that were able to distinguish different levels of student performance. For the short-form simulation, nine of the 20 items recorded greater than 25 % of scores as ‘not-assessed’ by clinical educators which impacted on the suitability of the APP tool in this simulation format. CONCLUSION: The APP was a valid assessment tool when used in longitudinal simulation formats. A revised APP may be required for assessment in short-form simulation scenarios. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0718-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4974700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49747002016-08-06 The validity of a professional competence tool for physiotherapy students in simulation-based clinical education: a Rasch analysis Judd, Belinda K. Scanlan, Justin N. Alison, Jennifer A. Waters, Donna Gordon, Christopher J. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the recent widespread adoption of simulation in clinical education in physiotherapy, there is a lack of validated tools for assessment in this setting. The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is a comprehensive tool used in clinical placement settings in Australia to measure professional competence of physiotherapy students. The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity of the APP for student assessment in simulation settings. METHODS: A total of 1260 APPs were collected, 971 from students in simulation and 289 from students in clinical placements. Rasch analysis was used to examine the construct validity of the APP tool in three different simulation assessment formats: longitudinal assessment over 1 week of simulation; longitudinal assessment over 2 weeks; and a short-form (25 min) assessment of a single simulation scenario. Comparison with APPs from 5 week clinical placements in hospital and clinic-based settings were also conducted. RESULTS: The APP demonstrated acceptable fit to the expectations of the Rasch model for the 1 and 2 week clinical simulations, exhibiting unidimensional properties that were able to distinguish different levels of student performance. For the short-form simulation, nine of the 20 items recorded greater than 25 % of scores as ‘not-assessed’ by clinical educators which impacted on the suitability of the APP tool in this simulation format. CONCLUSION: The APP was a valid assessment tool when used in longitudinal simulation formats. A revised APP may be required for assessment in short-form simulation scenarios. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0718-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4974700/ /pubmed/27492325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0718-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Judd, Belinda K.
Scanlan, Justin N.
Alison, Jennifer A.
Waters, Donna
Gordon, Christopher J.
The validity of a professional competence tool for physiotherapy students in simulation-based clinical education: a Rasch analysis
title The validity of a professional competence tool for physiotherapy students in simulation-based clinical education: a Rasch analysis
title_full The validity of a professional competence tool for physiotherapy students in simulation-based clinical education: a Rasch analysis
title_fullStr The validity of a professional competence tool for physiotherapy students in simulation-based clinical education: a Rasch analysis
title_full_unstemmed The validity of a professional competence tool for physiotherapy students in simulation-based clinical education: a Rasch analysis
title_short The validity of a professional competence tool for physiotherapy students in simulation-based clinical education: a Rasch analysis
title_sort validity of a professional competence tool for physiotherapy students in simulation-based clinical education: a rasch analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27492325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0718-x
work_keys_str_mv AT juddbelindak thevalidityofaprofessionalcompetencetoolforphysiotherapystudentsinsimulationbasedclinicaleducationaraschanalysis
AT scanlanjustinn thevalidityofaprofessionalcompetencetoolforphysiotherapystudentsinsimulationbasedclinicaleducationaraschanalysis
AT alisonjennifera thevalidityofaprofessionalcompetencetoolforphysiotherapystudentsinsimulationbasedclinicaleducationaraschanalysis
AT watersdonna thevalidityofaprofessionalcompetencetoolforphysiotherapystudentsinsimulationbasedclinicaleducationaraschanalysis
AT gordonchristopherj thevalidityofaprofessionalcompetencetoolforphysiotherapystudentsinsimulationbasedclinicaleducationaraschanalysis
AT juddbelindak validityofaprofessionalcompetencetoolforphysiotherapystudentsinsimulationbasedclinicaleducationaraschanalysis
AT scanlanjustinn validityofaprofessionalcompetencetoolforphysiotherapystudentsinsimulationbasedclinicaleducationaraschanalysis
AT alisonjennifera validityofaprofessionalcompetencetoolforphysiotherapystudentsinsimulationbasedclinicaleducationaraschanalysis
AT watersdonna validityofaprofessionalcompetencetoolforphysiotherapystudentsinsimulationbasedclinicaleducationaraschanalysis
AT gordonchristopherj validityofaprofessionalcompetencetoolforphysiotherapystudentsinsimulationbasedclinicaleducationaraschanalysis