Cargando…
Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial
BACKGROUND: Several biomarkers have shown to carry prognostic value beyond current triage algorithms and may aid in initial risk stratification of patients in the emergency department (ED). It has yet to be established if information provided by biomarkers can be used to prevent serious complication...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27491822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0290-8 |
_version_ | 1782446601158000640 |
---|---|
author | Sandø, Andreas Schultz, Martin Eugen-Olsen, Jesper Rasmussen, Lars Simon Køber, Lars Kjøller, Erik Jensen, Birgitte Nybo Ravn, Lisbet Lange, Theis Iversen, Kasper |
author_facet | Sandø, Andreas Schultz, Martin Eugen-Olsen, Jesper Rasmussen, Lars Simon Køber, Lars Kjøller, Erik Jensen, Birgitte Nybo Ravn, Lisbet Lange, Theis Iversen, Kasper |
author_sort | Sandø, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several biomarkers have shown to carry prognostic value beyond current triage algorithms and may aid in initial risk stratification of patients in the emergency department (ED). It has yet to be established if information provided by biomarkers can be used to prevent serious complications or deaths. Our aim is to determine whether measurement of the blood level of the biomarker soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) can enhance early risk stratification leading to reduced mortality, lower rate of complications, and improved patient flow in acutely admitted adult patients at the ED. The main hypothesis is that the availability of suPAR can reduce all-cause mortality, assessed at least 10 months after admission, by drawing attention towards patients with an unrecognized high risk, leading to improved diagnostics and treatment. METHODS: The study is designed as a cross-over cluster randomized interventional trial. SuPAR is measured within 2 h after admission and immediately reported to the treating physicians in the ED. All ED physicians are educated in the prognostic capabilities of suPAR prior to the inclusion period. The inclusion period began January 11(th) 2016 and ends June 6(th) 2016. The study aims to include 10.000 patients in both the interventional and control arm. The results will be presented in 2017. DISCUSSION: The present article aims to describe the design and rationale of the TRIAGE III study that will investigate whether the availability of prognostic information can improve outcome in acutely admitted patients. This might have an impact on health care organization and decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT02643459, November 13, 2015) and at the Danish Data Protection agency (ID HGH-2015-042 I-Suite no. 04087). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4974743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49747432016-08-06 Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial Sandø, Andreas Schultz, Martin Eugen-Olsen, Jesper Rasmussen, Lars Simon Køber, Lars Kjøller, Erik Jensen, Birgitte Nybo Ravn, Lisbet Lange, Theis Iversen, Kasper Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Several biomarkers have shown to carry prognostic value beyond current triage algorithms and may aid in initial risk stratification of patients in the emergency department (ED). It has yet to be established if information provided by biomarkers can be used to prevent serious complications or deaths. Our aim is to determine whether measurement of the blood level of the biomarker soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) can enhance early risk stratification leading to reduced mortality, lower rate of complications, and improved patient flow in acutely admitted adult patients at the ED. The main hypothesis is that the availability of suPAR can reduce all-cause mortality, assessed at least 10 months after admission, by drawing attention towards patients with an unrecognized high risk, leading to improved diagnostics and treatment. METHODS: The study is designed as a cross-over cluster randomized interventional trial. SuPAR is measured within 2 h after admission and immediately reported to the treating physicians in the ED. All ED physicians are educated in the prognostic capabilities of suPAR prior to the inclusion period. The inclusion period began January 11(th) 2016 and ends June 6(th) 2016. The study aims to include 10.000 patients in both the interventional and control arm. The results will be presented in 2017. DISCUSSION: The present article aims to describe the design and rationale of the TRIAGE III study that will investigate whether the availability of prognostic information can improve outcome in acutely admitted patients. This might have an impact on health care organization and decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT02643459, November 13, 2015) and at the Danish Data Protection agency (ID HGH-2015-042 I-Suite no. 04087). BioMed Central 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4974743/ /pubmed/27491822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0290-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Sandø, Andreas Schultz, Martin Eugen-Olsen, Jesper Rasmussen, Lars Simon Køber, Lars Kjøller, Erik Jensen, Birgitte Nybo Ravn, Lisbet Lange, Theis Iversen, Kasper Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial |
title | Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial |
title_full | Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial |
title_fullStr | Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial |
title_short | Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial |
title_sort | introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the triage iii cluster randomized interventional trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27491822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0290-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandøandreas introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial AT schultzmartin introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial AT eugenolsenjesper introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial AT rasmussenlarssimon introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial AT køberlars introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial AT kjøllererik introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial AT jensenbirgittenybo introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial AT ravnlisbet introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial AT langetheis introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial AT iversenkasper introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial |