Cargando…

Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial

BACKGROUND: Several biomarkers have shown to carry prognostic value beyond current triage algorithms and may aid in initial risk stratification of patients in the emergency department (ED). It has yet to be established if information provided by biomarkers can be used to prevent serious complication...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandø, Andreas, Schultz, Martin, Eugen-Olsen, Jesper, Rasmussen, Lars Simon, Køber, Lars, Kjøller, Erik, Jensen, Birgitte Nybo, Ravn, Lisbet, Lange, Theis, Iversen, Kasper
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27491822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0290-8
_version_ 1782446601158000640
author Sandø, Andreas
Schultz, Martin
Eugen-Olsen, Jesper
Rasmussen, Lars Simon
Køber, Lars
Kjøller, Erik
Jensen, Birgitte Nybo
Ravn, Lisbet
Lange, Theis
Iversen, Kasper
author_facet Sandø, Andreas
Schultz, Martin
Eugen-Olsen, Jesper
Rasmussen, Lars Simon
Køber, Lars
Kjøller, Erik
Jensen, Birgitte Nybo
Ravn, Lisbet
Lange, Theis
Iversen, Kasper
author_sort Sandø, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several biomarkers have shown to carry prognostic value beyond current triage algorithms and may aid in initial risk stratification of patients in the emergency department (ED). It has yet to be established if information provided by biomarkers can be used to prevent serious complications or deaths. Our aim is to determine whether measurement of the blood level of the biomarker soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) can enhance early risk stratification leading to reduced mortality, lower rate of complications, and improved patient flow in acutely admitted adult patients at the ED. The main hypothesis is that the availability of suPAR can reduce all-cause mortality, assessed at least 10 months after admission, by drawing attention towards patients with an unrecognized high risk, leading to improved diagnostics and treatment. METHODS: The study is designed as a cross-over cluster randomized interventional trial. SuPAR is measured within 2 h after admission and immediately reported to the treating physicians in the ED. All ED physicians are educated in the prognostic capabilities of suPAR prior to the inclusion period. The inclusion period began January 11(th) 2016 and ends June 6(th) 2016. The study aims to include 10.000 patients in both the interventional and control arm. The results will be presented in 2017. DISCUSSION: The present article aims to describe the design and rationale of the TRIAGE III study that will investigate whether the availability of prognostic information can improve outcome in acutely admitted patients. This might have an impact on health care organization and decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT02643459, November 13, 2015) and at the Danish Data Protection agency (ID HGH-2015-042 I-Suite no. 04087).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4974743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49747432016-08-06 Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial Sandø, Andreas Schultz, Martin Eugen-Olsen, Jesper Rasmussen, Lars Simon Køber, Lars Kjøller, Erik Jensen, Birgitte Nybo Ravn, Lisbet Lange, Theis Iversen, Kasper Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Several biomarkers have shown to carry prognostic value beyond current triage algorithms and may aid in initial risk stratification of patients in the emergency department (ED). It has yet to be established if information provided by biomarkers can be used to prevent serious complications or deaths. Our aim is to determine whether measurement of the blood level of the biomarker soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) can enhance early risk stratification leading to reduced mortality, lower rate of complications, and improved patient flow in acutely admitted adult patients at the ED. The main hypothesis is that the availability of suPAR can reduce all-cause mortality, assessed at least 10 months after admission, by drawing attention towards patients with an unrecognized high risk, leading to improved diagnostics and treatment. METHODS: The study is designed as a cross-over cluster randomized interventional trial. SuPAR is measured within 2 h after admission and immediately reported to the treating physicians in the ED. All ED physicians are educated in the prognostic capabilities of suPAR prior to the inclusion period. The inclusion period began January 11(th) 2016 and ends June 6(th) 2016. The study aims to include 10.000 patients in both the interventional and control arm. The results will be presented in 2017. DISCUSSION: The present article aims to describe the design and rationale of the TRIAGE III study that will investigate whether the availability of prognostic information can improve outcome in acutely admitted patients. This might have an impact on health care organization and decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID NCT02643459, November 13, 2015) and at the Danish Data Protection agency (ID HGH-2015-042 I-Suite no. 04087). BioMed Central 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4974743/ /pubmed/27491822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0290-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Sandø, Andreas
Schultz, Martin
Eugen-Olsen, Jesper
Rasmussen, Lars Simon
Køber, Lars
Kjøller, Erik
Jensen, Birgitte Nybo
Ravn, Lisbet
Lange, Theis
Iversen, Kasper
Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial
title Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial
title_full Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial
title_fullStr Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial
title_full_unstemmed Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial
title_short Introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the TRIAGE III cluster randomized interventional trial
title_sort introduction of a prognostic biomarker to strengthen risk stratification of acutely admitted patients: rationale and design of the triage iii cluster randomized interventional trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27491822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0290-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sandøandreas introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial
AT schultzmartin introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial
AT eugenolsenjesper introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial
AT rasmussenlarssimon introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial
AT køberlars introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial
AT kjøllererik introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial
AT jensenbirgittenybo introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial
AT ravnlisbet introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial
AT langetheis introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial
AT iversenkasper introductionofaprognosticbiomarkertostrengthenriskstratificationofacutelyadmittedpatientsrationaleanddesignofthetriageiiiclusterrandomizedinterventionaltrial