Cargando…

Validation and comparison of instruments to identify frail patientes in primary care settings: Study protocol

BACKGROUND: In the last few years several indices and tools, aimed at identifying frail subjects in various care settings have been developed. However, to date none of them has been incorporated into usual practice in the primary care setting. The purposes of this study are: 1) to evaluate the predi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vergara, Itziar, Rivas-Ruiz, Francisco, Vrotsou, Kalliopi, Contreras-Fernández, Eugenio, Téllez-Santana, Teresa, Machón, Mónica, Díez Ruiz, Ana Isabel, de Mesa Berenguer, Yolanda, Bueno, Andoni, Núñez, Jazmina, Saucedo Figueredo, M Carmen, Montiel-Luque, Alonso, Nava del Val, M Antonia, Quirós-López, Raúl, Carrasco, Estefanía, Abellan, Gabor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27492438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1540-1
_version_ 1782446606406123520
author Vergara, Itziar
Rivas-Ruiz, Francisco
Vrotsou, Kalliopi
Contreras-Fernández, Eugenio
Téllez-Santana, Teresa
Machón, Mónica
Díez Ruiz, Ana Isabel
de Mesa Berenguer, Yolanda
Bueno, Andoni
Núñez, Jazmina
Saucedo Figueredo, M Carmen
Montiel-Luque, Alonso
Nava del Val, M Antonia
Quirós-López, Raúl
Carrasco, Estefanía
Abellan, Gabor
author_facet Vergara, Itziar
Rivas-Ruiz, Francisco
Vrotsou, Kalliopi
Contreras-Fernández, Eugenio
Téllez-Santana, Teresa
Machón, Mónica
Díez Ruiz, Ana Isabel
de Mesa Berenguer, Yolanda
Bueno, Andoni
Núñez, Jazmina
Saucedo Figueredo, M Carmen
Montiel-Luque, Alonso
Nava del Val, M Antonia
Quirós-López, Raúl
Carrasco, Estefanía
Abellan, Gabor
author_sort Vergara, Itziar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the last few years several indices and tools, aimed at identifying frail subjects in various care settings have been developed. However, to date none of them has been incorporated into usual practice in the primary care setting. The purposes of this study are: 1) to evaluate the predictive capacity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), the Gérontopôle Frailty Screening Tool (GFST) and the KoS model together with two biomarker levels (SOX2 and p16INK4a) for adverse events related to frailty; 2) to determine differences in the use of healthcare services according to frailty. METHODS/DESIGN: Prospective multicentre cohort study with a 2-year follow-up. The study will be performed in primary care centres of Gipuzkoa and Costa del Sol, both located in Spain. Autonomous, non-institutionalized individuals aged 70 and over that agree to participate in this study will constitute the study population. A total of 900 individuals will be randomly selected from the healthcare administrative data bases of the participating health services. Data will be collected at baseline and at 1 and 2 years. The main independent variables assessed at baseline will be TFI outcomes, GFST and the KoS model, together with the expression of SOX2 and p16INK4a levels. During follow-up, loss of autonomy, the occurrence of death and consumption of healthcare resources will be assessed. DISCUSSION: The main focus of this work is the identification and evaluation of several instruments constructed under different rationales to identify frail subjects in primary care settings. The resulting outcomes have potential for direct application to the primary care practice. Early identification of the onset of functional impairment of elderly is an essential, still unresolved aspect in the prevention of dependence in the scope of primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4974766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49747662016-08-06 Validation and comparison of instruments to identify frail patientes in primary care settings: Study protocol Vergara, Itziar Rivas-Ruiz, Francisco Vrotsou, Kalliopi Contreras-Fernández, Eugenio Téllez-Santana, Teresa Machón, Mónica Díez Ruiz, Ana Isabel de Mesa Berenguer, Yolanda Bueno, Andoni Núñez, Jazmina Saucedo Figueredo, M Carmen Montiel-Luque, Alonso Nava del Val, M Antonia Quirós-López, Raúl Carrasco, Estefanía Abellan, Gabor BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In the last few years several indices and tools, aimed at identifying frail subjects in various care settings have been developed. However, to date none of them has been incorporated into usual practice in the primary care setting. The purposes of this study are: 1) to evaluate the predictive capacity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), the Gérontopôle Frailty Screening Tool (GFST) and the KoS model together with two biomarker levels (SOX2 and p16INK4a) for adverse events related to frailty; 2) to determine differences in the use of healthcare services according to frailty. METHODS/DESIGN: Prospective multicentre cohort study with a 2-year follow-up. The study will be performed in primary care centres of Gipuzkoa and Costa del Sol, both located in Spain. Autonomous, non-institutionalized individuals aged 70 and over that agree to participate in this study will constitute the study population. A total of 900 individuals will be randomly selected from the healthcare administrative data bases of the participating health services. Data will be collected at baseline and at 1 and 2 years. The main independent variables assessed at baseline will be TFI outcomes, GFST and the KoS model, together with the expression of SOX2 and p16INK4a levels. During follow-up, loss of autonomy, the occurrence of death and consumption of healthcare resources will be assessed. DISCUSSION: The main focus of this work is the identification and evaluation of several instruments constructed under different rationales to identify frail subjects in primary care settings. The resulting outcomes have potential for direct application to the primary care practice. Early identification of the onset of functional impairment of elderly is an essential, still unresolved aspect in the prevention of dependence in the scope of primary care. BioMed Central 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4974766/ /pubmed/27492438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1540-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Vergara, Itziar
Rivas-Ruiz, Francisco
Vrotsou, Kalliopi
Contreras-Fernández, Eugenio
Téllez-Santana, Teresa
Machón, Mónica
Díez Ruiz, Ana Isabel
de Mesa Berenguer, Yolanda
Bueno, Andoni
Núñez, Jazmina
Saucedo Figueredo, M Carmen
Montiel-Luque, Alonso
Nava del Val, M Antonia
Quirós-López, Raúl
Carrasco, Estefanía
Abellan, Gabor
Validation and comparison of instruments to identify frail patientes in primary care settings: Study protocol
title Validation and comparison of instruments to identify frail patientes in primary care settings: Study protocol
title_full Validation and comparison of instruments to identify frail patientes in primary care settings: Study protocol
title_fullStr Validation and comparison of instruments to identify frail patientes in primary care settings: Study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Validation and comparison of instruments to identify frail patientes in primary care settings: Study protocol
title_short Validation and comparison of instruments to identify frail patientes in primary care settings: Study protocol
title_sort validation and comparison of instruments to identify frail patientes in primary care settings: study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27492438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1540-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vergaraitziar validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT rivasruizfrancisco validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT vrotsoukalliopi validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT contrerasfernandezeugenio validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT tellezsantanateresa validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT machonmonica validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT diezruizanaisabel validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT demesaberengueryolanda validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT buenoandoni validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT nunezjazmina validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT saucedofigueredomcarmen validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT montielluquealonso validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT navadelvalmantonia validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT quiroslopezraul validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT carrascoestefania validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol
AT abellangabor validationandcomparisonofinstrumentstoidentifyfrailpatientesinprimarycaresettingsstudyprotocol