Cargando…
Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The sniffing position (neck flexion by head elevation and head extension) is commonly used for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. However, the appropriate degrees of head elevation and head extension are unclear. In the present study, the success rate of ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27494933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0220-3 |
_version_ | 1782446616534319104 |
---|---|
author | Yun, Mi-jung Hwang, Jung-Won Kim, Sung-Hoon Hong, Hyo-Ju Jeon, Young-Tae Park, Hee-Pyoung |
author_facet | Yun, Mi-jung Hwang, Jung-Won Kim, Sung-Hoon Hong, Hyo-Ju Jeon, Young-Tae Park, Hee-Pyoung |
author_sort | Yun, Mi-jung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The sniffing position (neck flexion by head elevation and head extension) is commonly used for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. However, the appropriate degrees of head elevation and head extension are unclear. In the present study, the success rate of ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (LMA ProSeal) insertion using two degrees of head elevation was evaluated. METHODS: This prospective randomized, controlled study included 80 adult patients aged 18 to 90 years. In the 3 cm (n = 40) and 6 cm (n = 40) groups, the LMA ProSeal was inserted while the head was elevated 3 cm and 6 cm, respectively, using a pillow of the corresponding height. The success rate, and incidence of blood staining on cuff, sore throat and hoarseness were assessed. The alignments of laryngeal and oral axes were also evaluated. RESULTS: The first attempt success rate was higher in the 3 cm than the 6 cm group (87 % vs. 60 %, P = 0.014). In 86 % of patients in the 6 cm group and 50 % of patients in the 3 cm group in whom the second attempt failed, the third insertion attempt was successful by using a pillow height of the opposite group. The alignments of the two axes were not different between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The first attempt success rate of ProSeal laryngeal mask insertion was higher with 3 cm than 6 cm head elevation in adult patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identifiers: NCT02058030 (08/05/2015), Unique Protocol ID: phdkim1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4974810 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49748102016-08-06 Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial Yun, Mi-jung Hwang, Jung-Won Kim, Sung-Hoon Hong, Hyo-Ju Jeon, Young-Tae Park, Hee-Pyoung BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The sniffing position (neck flexion by head elevation and head extension) is commonly used for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. However, the appropriate degrees of head elevation and head extension are unclear. In the present study, the success rate of ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (LMA ProSeal) insertion using two degrees of head elevation was evaluated. METHODS: This prospective randomized, controlled study included 80 adult patients aged 18 to 90 years. In the 3 cm (n = 40) and 6 cm (n = 40) groups, the LMA ProSeal was inserted while the head was elevated 3 cm and 6 cm, respectively, using a pillow of the corresponding height. The success rate, and incidence of blood staining on cuff, sore throat and hoarseness were assessed. The alignments of laryngeal and oral axes were also evaluated. RESULTS: The first attempt success rate was higher in the 3 cm than the 6 cm group (87 % vs. 60 %, P = 0.014). In 86 % of patients in the 6 cm group and 50 % of patients in the 3 cm group in whom the second attempt failed, the third insertion attempt was successful by using a pillow height of the opposite group. The alignments of the two axes were not different between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The first attempt success rate of ProSeal laryngeal mask insertion was higher with 3 cm than 6 cm head elevation in adult patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identifiers: NCT02058030 (08/05/2015), Unique Protocol ID: phdkim1. BioMed Central 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4974810/ /pubmed/27494933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0220-3 Text en © Yun et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yun, Mi-jung Hwang, Jung-Won Kim, Sung-Hoon Hong, Hyo-Ju Jeon, Young-Tae Park, Hee-Pyoung Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27494933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0220-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yunmijung headelevationby3vs6cminproseallaryngealmaskairwayinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hwangjungwon headelevationby3vs6cminproseallaryngealmaskairwayinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kimsunghoon headelevationby3vs6cminproseallaryngealmaskairwayinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT honghyoju headelevationby3vs6cminproseallaryngealmaskairwayinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jeonyoungtae headelevationby3vs6cminproseallaryngealmaskairwayinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parkheepyoung headelevationby3vs6cminproseallaryngealmaskairwayinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial |