Cargando…

Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The sniffing position (neck flexion by head elevation and head extension) is commonly used for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. However, the appropriate degrees of head elevation and head extension are unclear. In the present study, the success rate of ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yun, Mi-jung, Hwang, Jung-Won, Kim, Sung-Hoon, Hong, Hyo-Ju, Jeon, Young-Tae, Park, Hee-Pyoung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27494933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0220-3
_version_ 1782446616534319104
author Yun, Mi-jung
Hwang, Jung-Won
Kim, Sung-Hoon
Hong, Hyo-Ju
Jeon, Young-Tae
Park, Hee-Pyoung
author_facet Yun, Mi-jung
Hwang, Jung-Won
Kim, Sung-Hoon
Hong, Hyo-Ju
Jeon, Young-Tae
Park, Hee-Pyoung
author_sort Yun, Mi-jung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The sniffing position (neck flexion by head elevation and head extension) is commonly used for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. However, the appropriate degrees of head elevation and head extension are unclear. In the present study, the success rate of ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (LMA ProSeal) insertion using two degrees of head elevation was evaluated. METHODS: This prospective randomized, controlled study included 80 adult patients aged 18 to 90 years. In the 3 cm (n = 40) and 6 cm (n = 40) groups, the LMA ProSeal was inserted while the head was elevated 3 cm and 6 cm, respectively, using a pillow of the corresponding height. The success rate, and incidence of blood staining on cuff, sore throat and hoarseness were assessed. The alignments of laryngeal and oral axes were also evaluated. RESULTS: The first attempt success rate was higher in the 3 cm than the 6 cm group (87 % vs. 60 %, P = 0.014). In 86 % of patients in the 6 cm group and 50 % of patients in the 3 cm group in whom the second attempt failed, the third insertion attempt was successful by using a pillow height of the opposite group. The alignments of the two axes were not different between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The first attempt success rate of ProSeal laryngeal mask insertion was higher with 3 cm than 6 cm head elevation in adult patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identifiers: NCT02058030 (08/05/2015), Unique Protocol ID: phdkim1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4974810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49748102016-08-06 Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial Yun, Mi-jung Hwang, Jung-Won Kim, Sung-Hoon Hong, Hyo-Ju Jeon, Young-Tae Park, Hee-Pyoung BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The sniffing position (neck flexion by head elevation and head extension) is commonly used for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. However, the appropriate degrees of head elevation and head extension are unclear. In the present study, the success rate of ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (LMA ProSeal) insertion using two degrees of head elevation was evaluated. METHODS: This prospective randomized, controlled study included 80 adult patients aged 18 to 90 years. In the 3 cm (n = 40) and 6 cm (n = 40) groups, the LMA ProSeal was inserted while the head was elevated 3 cm and 6 cm, respectively, using a pillow of the corresponding height. The success rate, and incidence of blood staining on cuff, sore throat and hoarseness were assessed. The alignments of laryngeal and oral axes were also evaluated. RESULTS: The first attempt success rate was higher in the 3 cm than the 6 cm group (87 % vs. 60 %, P = 0.014). In 86 % of patients in the 6 cm group and 50 % of patients in the 3 cm group in whom the second attempt failed, the third insertion attempt was successful by using a pillow height of the opposite group. The alignments of the two axes were not different between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The first attempt success rate of ProSeal laryngeal mask insertion was higher with 3 cm than 6 cm head elevation in adult patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identifiers: NCT02058030 (08/05/2015), Unique Protocol ID: phdkim1. BioMed Central 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4974810/ /pubmed/27494933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0220-3 Text en © Yun et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yun, Mi-jung
Hwang, Jung-Won
Kim, Sung-Hoon
Hong, Hyo-Ju
Jeon, Young-Tae
Park, Hee-Pyoung
Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial
title Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort head elevation by 3 vs. 6 cm in proseal laryngeal mask airway insertion: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4974810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27494933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0220-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yunmijung headelevationby3vs6cminproseallaryngealmaskairwayinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hwangjungwon headelevationby3vs6cminproseallaryngealmaskairwayinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimsunghoon headelevationby3vs6cminproseallaryngealmaskairwayinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT honghyoju headelevationby3vs6cminproseallaryngealmaskairwayinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jeonyoungtae headelevationby3vs6cminproseallaryngealmaskairwayinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parkheepyoung headelevationby3vs6cminproseallaryngealmaskairwayinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial