Cargando…

Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search

Visual search efficiency improves with repetition of a search display, yet the mechanisms behind these processing gains remain unclear. According to Scanpath Theory, memory retrieval is mediated by repetition of the pattern of eye movements or “scanpath” elicited during stimulus encoding. Using this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wynn, Jordana S., Bone, Michael B., Dragan, Michelle C., Hoffman, Kari L., Buchsbaum, Bradley R., Ryan, Jennifer D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27570471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2016.1175531
_version_ 1782446655608455168
author Wynn, Jordana S.
Bone, Michael B.
Dragan, Michelle C.
Hoffman, Kari L.
Buchsbaum, Bradley R.
Ryan, Jennifer D.
author_facet Wynn, Jordana S.
Bone, Michael B.
Dragan, Michelle C.
Hoffman, Kari L.
Buchsbaum, Bradley R.
Ryan, Jennifer D.
author_sort Wynn, Jordana S.
collection PubMed
description Visual search efficiency improves with repetition of a search display, yet the mechanisms behind these processing gains remain unclear. According to Scanpath Theory, memory retrieval is mediated by repetition of the pattern of eye movements or “scanpath” elicited during stimulus encoding. Using this framework, we tested the prediction that scanpath recapitulation reflects relational memory guidance during repeated search events. Younger and older subjects were instructed to find changing targets within flickering naturalistic scenes. Search efficiency (search time, number of fixations, fixation duration) and scanpath similarity (repetition) were compared across age groups for novel (V1) and repeated (V2) search events. Younger adults outperformed older adults on all efficiency measures at both V1 and V2, while the search time benefit for repeated viewing (V1–V2) did not differ by age. Fixation-binned scanpath similarity analyses revealed repetition of initial and final (but not middle) V1 fixations at V2, with older adults repeating more initial V1 fixations than young adults. In young adults only, early scanpath similarity correlated negatively with search time at test, indicating increased efficiency, whereas the similarity of V2 fixations to middle V1 fixations predicted poor search performance. We conclude that scanpath compression mediates increased search efficiency by selectively recapitulating encoding fixations that provide goal-relevant input. Extending Scanpath Theory, results suggest that scanpath repetition varies as a function of time and memory integrity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4975086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49750862016-08-25 Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search Wynn, Jordana S. Bone, Michael B. Dragan, Michelle C. Hoffman, Kari L. Buchsbaum, Bradley R. Ryan, Jennifer D. Vis cogn Original Articles Visual search efficiency improves with repetition of a search display, yet the mechanisms behind these processing gains remain unclear. According to Scanpath Theory, memory retrieval is mediated by repetition of the pattern of eye movements or “scanpath” elicited during stimulus encoding. Using this framework, we tested the prediction that scanpath recapitulation reflects relational memory guidance during repeated search events. Younger and older subjects were instructed to find changing targets within flickering naturalistic scenes. Search efficiency (search time, number of fixations, fixation duration) and scanpath similarity (repetition) were compared across age groups for novel (V1) and repeated (V2) search events. Younger adults outperformed older adults on all efficiency measures at both V1 and V2, while the search time benefit for repeated viewing (V1–V2) did not differ by age. Fixation-binned scanpath similarity analyses revealed repetition of initial and final (but not middle) V1 fixations at V2, with older adults repeating more initial V1 fixations than young adults. In young adults only, early scanpath similarity correlated negatively with search time at test, indicating increased efficiency, whereas the similarity of V2 fixations to middle V1 fixations predicted poor search performance. We conclude that scanpath compression mediates increased search efficiency by selectively recapitulating encoding fixations that provide goal-relevant input. Extending Scanpath Theory, results suggest that scanpath repetition varies as a function of time and memory integrity. Routledge 2016-01-02 2016-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4975086/ /pubmed/27570471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2016.1175531 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wynn, Jordana S.
Bone, Michael B.
Dragan, Michelle C.
Hoffman, Kari L.
Buchsbaum, Bradley R.
Ryan, Jennifer D.
Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search
title Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search
title_full Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search
title_fullStr Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search
title_full_unstemmed Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search
title_short Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search
title_sort selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27570471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2016.1175531
work_keys_str_mv AT wynnjordanas selectivescanpathrepetitionduringmemoryguidedvisualsearch
AT bonemichaelb selectivescanpathrepetitionduringmemoryguidedvisualsearch
AT draganmichellec selectivescanpathrepetitionduringmemoryguidedvisualsearch
AT hoffmankaril selectivescanpathrepetitionduringmemoryguidedvisualsearch
AT buchsbaumbradleyr selectivescanpathrepetitionduringmemoryguidedvisualsearch
AT ryanjenniferd selectivescanpathrepetitionduringmemoryguidedvisualsearch