Cargando…
Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search
Visual search efficiency improves with repetition of a search display, yet the mechanisms behind these processing gains remain unclear. According to Scanpath Theory, memory retrieval is mediated by repetition of the pattern of eye movements or “scanpath” elicited during stimulus encoding. Using this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27570471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2016.1175531 |
_version_ | 1782446655608455168 |
---|---|
author | Wynn, Jordana S. Bone, Michael B. Dragan, Michelle C. Hoffman, Kari L. Buchsbaum, Bradley R. Ryan, Jennifer D. |
author_facet | Wynn, Jordana S. Bone, Michael B. Dragan, Michelle C. Hoffman, Kari L. Buchsbaum, Bradley R. Ryan, Jennifer D. |
author_sort | Wynn, Jordana S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Visual search efficiency improves with repetition of a search display, yet the mechanisms behind these processing gains remain unclear. According to Scanpath Theory, memory retrieval is mediated by repetition of the pattern of eye movements or “scanpath” elicited during stimulus encoding. Using this framework, we tested the prediction that scanpath recapitulation reflects relational memory guidance during repeated search events. Younger and older subjects were instructed to find changing targets within flickering naturalistic scenes. Search efficiency (search time, number of fixations, fixation duration) and scanpath similarity (repetition) were compared across age groups for novel (V1) and repeated (V2) search events. Younger adults outperformed older adults on all efficiency measures at both V1 and V2, while the search time benefit for repeated viewing (V1–V2) did not differ by age. Fixation-binned scanpath similarity analyses revealed repetition of initial and final (but not middle) V1 fixations at V2, with older adults repeating more initial V1 fixations than young adults. In young adults only, early scanpath similarity correlated negatively with search time at test, indicating increased efficiency, whereas the similarity of V2 fixations to middle V1 fixations predicted poor search performance. We conclude that scanpath compression mediates increased search efficiency by selectively recapitulating encoding fixations that provide goal-relevant input. Extending Scanpath Theory, results suggest that scanpath repetition varies as a function of time and memory integrity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4975086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49750862016-08-25 Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search Wynn, Jordana S. Bone, Michael B. Dragan, Michelle C. Hoffman, Kari L. Buchsbaum, Bradley R. Ryan, Jennifer D. Vis cogn Original Articles Visual search efficiency improves with repetition of a search display, yet the mechanisms behind these processing gains remain unclear. According to Scanpath Theory, memory retrieval is mediated by repetition of the pattern of eye movements or “scanpath” elicited during stimulus encoding. Using this framework, we tested the prediction that scanpath recapitulation reflects relational memory guidance during repeated search events. Younger and older subjects were instructed to find changing targets within flickering naturalistic scenes. Search efficiency (search time, number of fixations, fixation duration) and scanpath similarity (repetition) were compared across age groups for novel (V1) and repeated (V2) search events. Younger adults outperformed older adults on all efficiency measures at both V1 and V2, while the search time benefit for repeated viewing (V1–V2) did not differ by age. Fixation-binned scanpath similarity analyses revealed repetition of initial and final (but not middle) V1 fixations at V2, with older adults repeating more initial V1 fixations than young adults. In young adults only, early scanpath similarity correlated negatively with search time at test, indicating increased efficiency, whereas the similarity of V2 fixations to middle V1 fixations predicted poor search performance. We conclude that scanpath compression mediates increased search efficiency by selectively recapitulating encoding fixations that provide goal-relevant input. Extending Scanpath Theory, results suggest that scanpath repetition varies as a function of time and memory integrity. Routledge 2016-01-02 2016-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4975086/ /pubmed/27570471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2016.1175531 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Wynn, Jordana S. Bone, Michael B. Dragan, Michelle C. Hoffman, Kari L. Buchsbaum, Bradley R. Ryan, Jennifer D. Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search |
title | Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search |
title_full | Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search |
title_fullStr | Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search |
title_full_unstemmed | Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search |
title_short | Selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search |
title_sort | selective scanpath repetition during memory-guided visual search |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27570471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2016.1175531 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wynnjordanas selectivescanpathrepetitionduringmemoryguidedvisualsearch AT bonemichaelb selectivescanpathrepetitionduringmemoryguidedvisualsearch AT draganmichellec selectivescanpathrepetitionduringmemoryguidedvisualsearch AT hoffmankaril selectivescanpathrepetitionduringmemoryguidedvisualsearch AT buchsbaumbradleyr selectivescanpathrepetitionduringmemoryguidedvisualsearch AT ryanjenniferd selectivescanpathrepetitionduringmemoryguidedvisualsearch |