Cargando…
The Impact for Patient Outcomes of Failure to Follow Up on Test Results. How Can We Do Better?
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization–World Alliance for Patient Safety has identified test result management as a priority area. Poor test result follow-up can have major consequences for the quality of care, including missed diagnoses and suboptimal patient outcomes. Over the last three decade...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683480 |
_version_ | 1782446682796982272 |
---|---|
author | Callen, Joanne Georgiou, Andrew Li, Julie Westbrook, Johanna I |
author_facet | Callen, Joanne Georgiou, Andrew Li, Julie Westbrook, Johanna I |
author_sort | Callen, Joanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization–World Alliance for Patient Safety has identified test result management as a priority area. Poor test result follow-up can have major consequences for the quality of care, including missed diagnoses and suboptimal patient outcomes. Over the last three decades there has been considerable growth in the number of requests for pathology and radiology services which has added to the complexity of how patient care is delivered and test results are managed. This can contribute to a lack of clarity about where and with whom responsibility for test follow-up should reside: a problem that is compounded by a lack of clear definitions about what are critical, unexpected or significantly abnormal results. AIM OF THIS PAPER: This paper will present a narrative review highlighting key issues related to the problem of failure to follow up laboratory test results, and outline potential solutions. CONCLUSIONS: Information technology (IT) has the potential to enhance the performance and safety of test result management processes. Effective solutions must engage all stakeholders, including consumers, in arriving at decisions about who needs to receive results, how and when they are communicated, and how they are acknowledged and acted upon and the documentation of these actions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4975222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49752222016-09-28 The Impact for Patient Outcomes of Failure to Follow Up on Test Results. How Can We Do Better? Callen, Joanne Georgiou, Andrew Li, Julie Westbrook, Johanna I EJIFCC Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization–World Alliance for Patient Safety has identified test result management as a priority area. Poor test result follow-up can have major consequences for the quality of care, including missed diagnoses and suboptimal patient outcomes. Over the last three decades there has been considerable growth in the number of requests for pathology and radiology services which has added to the complexity of how patient care is delivered and test results are managed. This can contribute to a lack of clarity about where and with whom responsibility for test follow-up should reside: a problem that is compounded by a lack of clear definitions about what are critical, unexpected or significantly abnormal results. AIM OF THIS PAPER: This paper will present a narrative review highlighting key issues related to the problem of failure to follow up laboratory test results, and outline potential solutions. CONCLUSIONS: Information technology (IT) has the potential to enhance the performance and safety of test result management processes. Effective solutions must engage all stakeholders, including consumers, in arriving at decisions about who needs to receive results, how and when they are communicated, and how they are acknowledged and acted upon and the documentation of these actions. The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC 2015-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4975222/ /pubmed/27683480 Text en Copyright © 2015 International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Callen, Joanne Georgiou, Andrew Li, Julie Westbrook, Johanna I The Impact for Patient Outcomes of Failure to Follow Up on Test Results. How Can We Do Better? |
title | The Impact for Patient Outcomes of Failure to Follow Up on Test Results. How Can We Do Better? |
title_full | The Impact for Patient Outcomes of Failure to Follow Up on Test Results. How Can We Do Better? |
title_fullStr | The Impact for Patient Outcomes of Failure to Follow Up on Test Results. How Can We Do Better? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact for Patient Outcomes of Failure to Follow Up on Test Results. How Can We Do Better? |
title_short | The Impact for Patient Outcomes of Failure to Follow Up on Test Results. How Can We Do Better? |
title_sort | impact for patient outcomes of failure to follow up on test results. how can we do better? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT callenjoanne theimpactforpatientoutcomesoffailuretofollowupontestresultshowcanwedobetter AT georgiouandrew theimpactforpatientoutcomesoffailuretofollowupontestresultshowcanwedobetter AT lijulie theimpactforpatientoutcomesoffailuretofollowupontestresultshowcanwedobetter AT westbrookjohannai theimpactforpatientoutcomesoffailuretofollowupontestresultshowcanwedobetter AT callenjoanne impactforpatientoutcomesoffailuretofollowupontestresultshowcanwedobetter AT georgiouandrew impactforpatientoutcomesoffailuretofollowupontestresultshowcanwedobetter AT lijulie impactforpatientoutcomesoffailuretofollowupontestresultshowcanwedobetter AT westbrookjohannai impactforpatientoutcomesoffailuretofollowupontestresultshowcanwedobetter |