Cargando…
Critical Appraisal of Microbiology Guidelines Endorsed by two Professional Organisations: Société Française De Microbiologie (SFM) and American Society of Microbiology (ASM)
Medical practice guidelines (GLs) being tools that are mainly designed to evaluate medical professionals, it sounds logical, and fair, that professionals should in turn evaluate GLs. Microbiology being a medical discipline, we used the AGREE instrument, i.e. an established evaluation tool for GLs, i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683409 |
_version_ | 1782446686784716800 |
---|---|
author | Fonfrède, Michèle Couaillac, Jean Paul Augereau, Christine Lepargneur, Jean Pierre Watine, Joseph |
author_facet | Fonfrède, Michèle Couaillac, Jean Paul Augereau, Christine Lepargneur, Jean Pierre Watine, Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | Medical practice guidelines (GLs) being tools that are mainly designed to evaluate medical professionals, it sounds logical, and fair, that professionals should in turn evaluate GLs. Microbiology being a medical discipline, we used the AGREE instrument, i.e. an established evaluation tool for GLs, in order to evaluate the quality of two major microbiology guidelines, i.e. the SFM GLs and the ASM GLs). Both guidelines remain sub-optimal in their levels of quality, and obtain scores that are not very different from the average scores obtained by many other guidelines in various medical disciplines. We therefore believe that both guidelines need to be modified before they can be recommended without provisos. A higher degree of multi-disciplinary work, including a more formal implication of methodologists, as well as of infectious disease clinicians, and of economists, might perhaps enable future editions of these guidelines to reach higher levels of quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4975240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49752402016-09-28 Critical Appraisal of Microbiology Guidelines Endorsed by two Professional Organisations: Société Française De Microbiologie (SFM) and American Society of Microbiology (ASM) Fonfrède, Michèle Couaillac, Jean Paul Augereau, Christine Lepargneur, Jean Pierre Watine, Joseph EJIFCC Research Article Medical practice guidelines (GLs) being tools that are mainly designed to evaluate medical professionals, it sounds logical, and fair, that professionals should in turn evaluate GLs. Microbiology being a medical discipline, we used the AGREE instrument, i.e. an established evaluation tool for GLs, in order to evaluate the quality of two major microbiology guidelines, i.e. the SFM GLs and the ASM GLs). Both guidelines remain sub-optimal in their levels of quality, and obtain scores that are not very different from the average scores obtained by many other guidelines in various medical disciplines. We therefore believe that both guidelines need to be modified before they can be recommended without provisos. A higher degree of multi-disciplinary work, including a more formal implication of methodologists, as well as of infectious disease clinicians, and of economists, might perhaps enable future editions of these guidelines to reach higher levels of quality. The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC 2012-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4975240/ /pubmed/27683409 Text en Copyright © 2012 International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fonfrède, Michèle Couaillac, Jean Paul Augereau, Christine Lepargneur, Jean Pierre Watine, Joseph Critical Appraisal of Microbiology Guidelines Endorsed by two Professional Organisations: Société Française De Microbiologie (SFM) and American Society of Microbiology (ASM) |
title | Critical Appraisal of Microbiology Guidelines Endorsed by two Professional Organisations: Société Française De Microbiologie (SFM) and American Society of Microbiology (ASM) |
title_full | Critical Appraisal of Microbiology Guidelines Endorsed by two Professional Organisations: Société Française De Microbiologie (SFM) and American Society of Microbiology (ASM) |
title_fullStr | Critical Appraisal of Microbiology Guidelines Endorsed by two Professional Organisations: Société Française De Microbiologie (SFM) and American Society of Microbiology (ASM) |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical Appraisal of Microbiology Guidelines Endorsed by two Professional Organisations: Société Française De Microbiologie (SFM) and American Society of Microbiology (ASM) |
title_short | Critical Appraisal of Microbiology Guidelines Endorsed by two Professional Organisations: Société Française De Microbiologie (SFM) and American Society of Microbiology (ASM) |
title_sort | critical appraisal of microbiology guidelines endorsed by two professional organisations: société française de microbiologie (sfm) and american society of microbiology (asm) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT criticalappraisalofmicrobiologyguidelinesendorsedbytwoprofessionalorganisationssocietefrancaisedemicrobiologiesfmandamericansocietyofmicrobiologyasm AT fonfredemichele criticalappraisalofmicrobiologyguidelinesendorsedbytwoprofessionalorganisationssocietefrancaisedemicrobiologiesfmandamericansocietyofmicrobiologyasm AT couaillacjeanpaul criticalappraisalofmicrobiologyguidelinesendorsedbytwoprofessionalorganisationssocietefrancaisedemicrobiologiesfmandamericansocietyofmicrobiologyasm AT augereauchristine criticalappraisalofmicrobiologyguidelinesendorsedbytwoprofessionalorganisationssocietefrancaisedemicrobiologiesfmandamericansocietyofmicrobiologyasm AT lepargneurjeanpierre criticalappraisalofmicrobiologyguidelinesendorsedbytwoprofessionalorganisationssocietefrancaisedemicrobiologiesfmandamericansocietyofmicrobiologyasm AT watinejoseph criticalappraisalofmicrobiologyguidelinesendorsedbytwoprofessionalorganisationssocietefrancaisedemicrobiologiesfmandamericansocietyofmicrobiologyasm |