Cargando…

Defining the Path Forward: Guidance for Laboratory Medicine Guidelines

The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) has developed consensus-based guidelines for the laboratory evaluation and monitoring of patients with specified disorders for two decades. In 1997, the NACB recognized the need to standardize the process of guideline development and promulgated i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kahn, Stephen E., Jones, Patricia M., Chin, Alex C., Christenson, Robert H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683491
_version_ 1782446700227461120
author Kahn, Stephen E.
Jones, Patricia M.
Chin, Alex C.
Christenson, Robert H.
author_facet Kahn, Stephen E.
Jones, Patricia M.
Chin, Alex C.
Christenson, Robert H.
author_sort Kahn, Stephen E.
collection PubMed
description The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) has developed consensus-based guidelines for the laboratory evaluation and monitoring of patients with specified disorders for two decades. In 1997, the NACB recognized the need to standardize the process of guideline development and promulgated its first Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for this purpose. In 2010, the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) and NACB created the Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine Committee (EBLMC). Among other roles, this group was given responsibility to provide oversight of clinical practice guideline development in accordance with SOP guidance and using currently accepted good practices. In 2011, the U.S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) published two reports of relevance: ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust’ and ‘Finding What Works in Health Care – Standards for Systematic Reviews.’ These reports were created as part of a response to a legislative mandate from the U.S. Congress requesting that steps be taken to implement recommendations from lOM’s report on ‘Knowing What Works in Health Care’ (2008). The latest revision of the laboratory medicine practice guidelines (LMPG) SOP was in part driven by these reports. NACB continues to develop LMPGs at a rate of roughly one per year through standard processes detailed in its 2014 revision of the SOP. This article describes the NACB and EBLMC experience in developing LMPGs with a focus on the evolution and use of the latest SOP. AACC and NACB have established a solid track record in collaboratively working with many clinical societies and professional organizations on clinical practice guideline development. Presently, three LMPG’s are in various stages of development and all with the collaboration of other clinical/professional groups. The practices and tools being used for current LMPGs in progress are also highlighted in the context of the challenges that presently exist for effective clinical practice guideline development in the U.S.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4975300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49753002016-09-28 Defining the Path Forward: Guidance for Laboratory Medicine Guidelines Kahn, Stephen E. Jones, Patricia M. Chin, Alex C. Christenson, Robert H. EJIFCC Research Article The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) has developed consensus-based guidelines for the laboratory evaluation and monitoring of patients with specified disorders for two decades. In 1997, the NACB recognized the need to standardize the process of guideline development and promulgated its first Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for this purpose. In 2010, the American Association of Clinical Chemistry (AACC) and NACB created the Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine Committee (EBLMC). Among other roles, this group was given responsibility to provide oversight of clinical practice guideline development in accordance with SOP guidance and using currently accepted good practices. In 2011, the U.S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) published two reports of relevance: ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust’ and ‘Finding What Works in Health Care – Standards for Systematic Reviews.’ These reports were created as part of a response to a legislative mandate from the U.S. Congress requesting that steps be taken to implement recommendations from lOM’s report on ‘Knowing What Works in Health Care’ (2008). The latest revision of the laboratory medicine practice guidelines (LMPG) SOP was in part driven by these reports. NACB continues to develop LMPGs at a rate of roughly one per year through standard processes detailed in its 2014 revision of the SOP. This article describes the NACB and EBLMC experience in developing LMPGs with a focus on the evolution and use of the latest SOP. AACC and NACB have established a solid track record in collaboratively working with many clinical societies and professional organizations on clinical practice guideline development. Presently, three LMPG’s are in various stages of development and all with the collaboration of other clinical/professional groups. The practices and tools being used for current LMPGs in progress are also highlighted in the context of the challenges that presently exist for effective clinical practice guideline development in the U.S. The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC 2015-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4975300/ /pubmed/27683491 Text en Copyright © 2015 International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kahn, Stephen E.
Jones, Patricia M.
Chin, Alex C.
Christenson, Robert H.
Defining the Path Forward: Guidance for Laboratory Medicine Guidelines
title Defining the Path Forward: Guidance for Laboratory Medicine Guidelines
title_full Defining the Path Forward: Guidance for Laboratory Medicine Guidelines
title_fullStr Defining the Path Forward: Guidance for Laboratory Medicine Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Defining the Path Forward: Guidance for Laboratory Medicine Guidelines
title_short Defining the Path Forward: Guidance for Laboratory Medicine Guidelines
title_sort defining the path forward: guidance for laboratory medicine guidelines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27683491
work_keys_str_mv AT kahnstephene definingthepathforwardguidanceforlaboratorymedicineguidelines
AT jonespatriciam definingthepathforwardguidanceforlaboratorymedicineguidelines
AT chinalexc definingthepathforwardguidanceforlaboratorymedicineguidelines
AT christensonroberth definingthepathforwardguidanceforlaboratorymedicineguidelines