Cargando…

A Comparison Study of Single-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging and Combined Multi-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging in Visualizing Asymmetric Medullary Veins in Stroke Patients

BACKGROUND: Asymmetric medullary veins (AMV) are frequently observed in stroke patients and single-echo susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI(s)) is the main technique in detecting AMV. Our study aimed to investigate which echo time (TE) on single-echo susceptibility is the optimal echo for visualizi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Chao, Qiu, Tiantian, Song, Ruirui, Jiaerken, Yerfan, Yang, Linglin, Wang, Shaoze, Zhang, Minming, Yu, Xinfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27494171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159251
_version_ 1782446720086441984
author Wang, Chao
Qiu, Tiantian
Song, Ruirui
Jiaerken, Yerfan
Yang, Linglin
Wang, Shaoze
Zhang, Minming
Yu, Xinfeng
author_facet Wang, Chao
Qiu, Tiantian
Song, Ruirui
Jiaerken, Yerfan
Yang, Linglin
Wang, Shaoze
Zhang, Minming
Yu, Xinfeng
author_sort Wang, Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Asymmetric medullary veins (AMV) are frequently observed in stroke patients and single-echo susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI(s)) is the main technique in detecting AMV. Our study aimed to investigate which echo time (TE) on single-echo susceptibility is the optimal echo for visualizing AMV and to compare the ability in detecting AMV in stroke patients between SWI(s) and multi-echo susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI(c)). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with middle cerebral artery stroke were included. SWI was acquired by using a multi-echo gradient-echo sequence with six echoes ranging from 5 ms to 35.240 ms. Three different echoes of SWI(s) including SWI(s1) (TE = 23.144 ms), SWI(s2) (TE = 29.192 ms) and SWI(s3) (TE = 35.240 ms) were reconstructed. SWI(c) was averaged using the three echoes of SWI(s). Image quality and venous contrast of medullary veins were compared between SWI(s) and SWI(c) using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), mean opinion score (MOS), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The presence of AMV was evaluated in each SWI(s (1–3)) and SWI(c). RESULTS: SWI(s2) had the highest PSNR, MOS and CNR and SWI(s1) had the highest SNR among three different echoes of SWI(s). No significant difference was found in SNR between SWI(s1) and SWI(s2). PSNR, MOS and CNR in SWI(c) were significantly increased by 27.9%, 28.2% and 17.2% compared with SWI(s2) and SNR in SWI(c) was significantly increased by 32.4% compared with SWI(s1). 55% of patients with AMV were detected in SWI(s2), SWI(s3) and SWI(c), while 50% AMV were found in SWI(s1). CONCLUSIONS: SWI(s) using TE around 29ms was optimal in visualizing AMV. SWI(c) could improve image quality and venous contrast, but was equal to SWI(s) using a relative long TE in evaluating AMV. These results provide the technique basis for further research of AMV in stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4975399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49753992016-08-25 A Comparison Study of Single-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging and Combined Multi-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging in Visualizing Asymmetric Medullary Veins in Stroke Patients Wang, Chao Qiu, Tiantian Song, Ruirui Jiaerken, Yerfan Yang, Linglin Wang, Shaoze Zhang, Minming Yu, Xinfeng PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Asymmetric medullary veins (AMV) are frequently observed in stroke patients and single-echo susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI(s)) is the main technique in detecting AMV. Our study aimed to investigate which echo time (TE) on single-echo susceptibility is the optimal echo for visualizing AMV and to compare the ability in detecting AMV in stroke patients between SWI(s) and multi-echo susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI(c)). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with middle cerebral artery stroke were included. SWI was acquired by using a multi-echo gradient-echo sequence with six echoes ranging from 5 ms to 35.240 ms. Three different echoes of SWI(s) including SWI(s1) (TE = 23.144 ms), SWI(s2) (TE = 29.192 ms) and SWI(s3) (TE = 35.240 ms) were reconstructed. SWI(c) was averaged using the three echoes of SWI(s). Image quality and venous contrast of medullary veins were compared between SWI(s) and SWI(c) using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), mean opinion score (MOS), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The presence of AMV was evaluated in each SWI(s (1–3)) and SWI(c). RESULTS: SWI(s2) had the highest PSNR, MOS and CNR and SWI(s1) had the highest SNR among three different echoes of SWI(s). No significant difference was found in SNR between SWI(s1) and SWI(s2). PSNR, MOS and CNR in SWI(c) were significantly increased by 27.9%, 28.2% and 17.2% compared with SWI(s2) and SNR in SWI(c) was significantly increased by 32.4% compared with SWI(s1). 55% of patients with AMV were detected in SWI(s2), SWI(s3) and SWI(c), while 50% AMV were found in SWI(s1). CONCLUSIONS: SWI(s) using TE around 29ms was optimal in visualizing AMV. SWI(c) could improve image quality and venous contrast, but was equal to SWI(s) using a relative long TE in evaluating AMV. These results provide the technique basis for further research of AMV in stroke. Public Library of Science 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4975399/ /pubmed/27494171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159251 Text en © 2016 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Chao
Qiu, Tiantian
Song, Ruirui
Jiaerken, Yerfan
Yang, Linglin
Wang, Shaoze
Zhang, Minming
Yu, Xinfeng
A Comparison Study of Single-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging and Combined Multi-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging in Visualizing Asymmetric Medullary Veins in Stroke Patients
title A Comparison Study of Single-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging and Combined Multi-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging in Visualizing Asymmetric Medullary Veins in Stroke Patients
title_full A Comparison Study of Single-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging and Combined Multi-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging in Visualizing Asymmetric Medullary Veins in Stroke Patients
title_fullStr A Comparison Study of Single-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging and Combined Multi-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging in Visualizing Asymmetric Medullary Veins in Stroke Patients
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison Study of Single-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging and Combined Multi-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging in Visualizing Asymmetric Medullary Veins in Stroke Patients
title_short A Comparison Study of Single-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging and Combined Multi-Echo Susceptibility Weighted Imaging in Visualizing Asymmetric Medullary Veins in Stroke Patients
title_sort comparison study of single-echo susceptibility weighted imaging and combined multi-echo susceptibility weighted imaging in visualizing asymmetric medullary veins in stroke patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27494171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159251
work_keys_str_mv AT wangchao acomparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT qiutiantian acomparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT songruirui acomparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT jiaerkenyerfan acomparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT yanglinglin acomparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT wangshaoze acomparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT zhangminming acomparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT yuxinfeng acomparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT wangchao comparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT qiutiantian comparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT songruirui comparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT jiaerkenyerfan comparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT yanglinglin comparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT wangshaoze comparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT zhangminming comparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients
AT yuxinfeng comparisonstudyofsingleechosusceptibilityweightedimagingandcombinedmultiechosusceptibilityweightedimaginginvisualizingasymmetricmedullaryveinsinstrokepatients