Cargando…

Genomic Inbreeding and Relatedness in Wild Panda Populations

Inbreeding and relatedness in wild panda populations are important parameters for panda conservation. Habitat loss and fragmentation are expected to increase inbreeding but the actual inbreeding levels in natural panda habitats were unknown. Using 150,025 SNPs and 14,926 SNPs selected from published...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garbe, John R., Prakapenka, Dzianis, Tan, Cheng, Da, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27494031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160496
_version_ 1782446739765067776
author Garbe, John R.
Prakapenka, Dzianis
Tan, Cheng
Da, Yang
author_facet Garbe, John R.
Prakapenka, Dzianis
Tan, Cheng
Da, Yang
author_sort Garbe, John R.
collection PubMed
description Inbreeding and relatedness in wild panda populations are important parameters for panda conservation. Habitat loss and fragmentation are expected to increase inbreeding but the actual inbreeding levels in natural panda habitats were unknown. Using 150,025 SNPs and 14,926 SNPs selected from published whole-genome sequences, we estimated genomic inbreeding coefficients and relatedness of 49 pandas including 34 wild pandas sampled from six habitats. Qinling and Liangshan pandas had the highest levels of inbreeding and relatedness measured by genomic inbreeding and coancestry coefficients, whereas the inbreeding levels in Qionglai and Minshan were 28–45% of those in Qinling and Liangshan. Genomic coancestry coefficients between pandas from different habitats showed that panda populations from the four largest habitats, Minshan, Qionglai, Qinling and Liangshan, were genetically unrelated. Pandas between these four habitats on average shared 66.0–69.1% common alleles and 45.6–48.6% common genotypes, whereas pandas within each habitat shared 71.8–77.0% common alleles and 51.7–60.4% common genotypes. Pandas in the smaller populations of Qinling and Liangshan were more similarly to each other than pandas in the larger populations of Qionglai and Minshan according to three genomic similarity measures. Panda genetic differentiation between these habitats was positively related to their geographical distances. Most pandas separated by 200 kilometers or more shared no common ancestral alleles. The results provided a genomic quantification of the actual levels of inbreeding and relatedness among pandas in their natural habitats, provided genomic confirmation of the relationship between genetic diversity and geographical distances, and provided genomic evidence to the urgency of habitat protection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4975500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49755002016-08-25 Genomic Inbreeding and Relatedness in Wild Panda Populations Garbe, John R. Prakapenka, Dzianis Tan, Cheng Da, Yang PLoS One Research Article Inbreeding and relatedness in wild panda populations are important parameters for panda conservation. Habitat loss and fragmentation are expected to increase inbreeding but the actual inbreeding levels in natural panda habitats were unknown. Using 150,025 SNPs and 14,926 SNPs selected from published whole-genome sequences, we estimated genomic inbreeding coefficients and relatedness of 49 pandas including 34 wild pandas sampled from six habitats. Qinling and Liangshan pandas had the highest levels of inbreeding and relatedness measured by genomic inbreeding and coancestry coefficients, whereas the inbreeding levels in Qionglai and Minshan were 28–45% of those in Qinling and Liangshan. Genomic coancestry coefficients between pandas from different habitats showed that panda populations from the four largest habitats, Minshan, Qionglai, Qinling and Liangshan, were genetically unrelated. Pandas between these four habitats on average shared 66.0–69.1% common alleles and 45.6–48.6% common genotypes, whereas pandas within each habitat shared 71.8–77.0% common alleles and 51.7–60.4% common genotypes. Pandas in the smaller populations of Qinling and Liangshan were more similarly to each other than pandas in the larger populations of Qionglai and Minshan according to three genomic similarity measures. Panda genetic differentiation between these habitats was positively related to their geographical distances. Most pandas separated by 200 kilometers or more shared no common ancestral alleles. The results provided a genomic quantification of the actual levels of inbreeding and relatedness among pandas in their natural habitats, provided genomic confirmation of the relationship between genetic diversity and geographical distances, and provided genomic evidence to the urgency of habitat protection. Public Library of Science 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4975500/ /pubmed/27494031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160496 Text en © 2016 Garbe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Garbe, John R.
Prakapenka, Dzianis
Tan, Cheng
Da, Yang
Genomic Inbreeding and Relatedness in Wild Panda Populations
title Genomic Inbreeding and Relatedness in Wild Panda Populations
title_full Genomic Inbreeding and Relatedness in Wild Panda Populations
title_fullStr Genomic Inbreeding and Relatedness in Wild Panda Populations
title_full_unstemmed Genomic Inbreeding and Relatedness in Wild Panda Populations
title_short Genomic Inbreeding and Relatedness in Wild Panda Populations
title_sort genomic inbreeding and relatedness in wild panda populations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27494031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160496
work_keys_str_mv AT garbejohnr genomicinbreedingandrelatednessinwildpandapopulations
AT prakapenkadzianis genomicinbreedingandrelatednessinwildpandapopulations
AT tancheng genomicinbreedingandrelatednessinwildpandapopulations
AT dayang genomicinbreedingandrelatednessinwildpandapopulations