Cargando…
Shatter cones: (Mis)understood?
Meteorite impact craters are one of the most common geological features in the solar system. An impact event is a near-instantaneous process that releases a huge amount of energy over a very small region on a planetary surface. This results in characteristic changes in the target rocks, from vaporiz...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27532050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600616 |
_version_ | 1782446744845418496 |
---|---|
author | Osinski, Gordon R. Ferrière, Ludovic |
author_facet | Osinski, Gordon R. Ferrière, Ludovic |
author_sort | Osinski, Gordon R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Meteorite impact craters are one of the most common geological features in the solar system. An impact event is a near-instantaneous process that releases a huge amount of energy over a very small region on a planetary surface. This results in characteristic changes in the target rocks, from vaporization and melting to solid-state effects, such as fracturing and shock metamorphism. Shatter cones are distinctive striated conical fractures that are considered unequivocal evidence of impact events. They are one of the most used and trusted shock-metamorphic effects for the recognition of meteorite impact structures. Despite this, there is still considerable debate regarding their formation. We show that shatter cones are present in several stratigraphic settings within and around impact structures. Together with the occurrence of complete and “double” cones, our observations are most consistent with shatter cone formation due to tensional stresses generated by scattering of the shock wave due to heterogeneities in the rock. On the basis of field mapping, we derive the relationship D(sc) = 0.4 D(a), where D(sc) is the maximum spatial extent of in situ shatter cones, and D(a) is the apparent crater diameter. This provides an important, new, more accurate method to estimate the apparent diameter of eroded complex craters on Earth. We have reestimated the diameter of eight well-known impact craters as part of this study. Finally, we suggest that shatter cones may reduce the strength of the target, thus aiding crater collapse, and that their distribution in central uplifts also records the obliquity of impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4975556 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | American Association for the Advancement of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49755562016-08-16 Shatter cones: (Mis)understood? Osinski, Gordon R. Ferrière, Ludovic Sci Adv Research Articles Meteorite impact craters are one of the most common geological features in the solar system. An impact event is a near-instantaneous process that releases a huge amount of energy over a very small region on a planetary surface. This results in characteristic changes in the target rocks, from vaporization and melting to solid-state effects, such as fracturing and shock metamorphism. Shatter cones are distinctive striated conical fractures that are considered unequivocal evidence of impact events. They are one of the most used and trusted shock-metamorphic effects for the recognition of meteorite impact structures. Despite this, there is still considerable debate regarding their formation. We show that shatter cones are present in several stratigraphic settings within and around impact structures. Together with the occurrence of complete and “double” cones, our observations are most consistent with shatter cone formation due to tensional stresses generated by scattering of the shock wave due to heterogeneities in the rock. On the basis of field mapping, we derive the relationship D(sc) = 0.4 D(a), where D(sc) is the maximum spatial extent of in situ shatter cones, and D(a) is the apparent crater diameter. This provides an important, new, more accurate method to estimate the apparent diameter of eroded complex craters on Earth. We have reestimated the diameter of eight well-known impact craters as part of this study. Finally, we suggest that shatter cones may reduce the strength of the target, thus aiding crater collapse, and that their distribution in central uplifts also records the obliquity of impact. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4975556/ /pubmed/27532050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600616 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Osinski, Gordon R. Ferrière, Ludovic Shatter cones: (Mis)understood? |
title | Shatter cones: (Mis)understood? |
title_full | Shatter cones: (Mis)understood? |
title_fullStr | Shatter cones: (Mis)understood? |
title_full_unstemmed | Shatter cones: (Mis)understood? |
title_short | Shatter cones: (Mis)understood? |
title_sort | shatter cones: (mis)understood? |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27532050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT osinskigordonr shatterconesmisunderstood AT ferriereludovic shatterconesmisunderstood |