Cargando…
PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study
PURPOSE: To identify optimal pulsed gradient spin‐echo (PGSE) and oscillating gradient spin‐echo (OGSE) sequence settings for maximizing sensitivity to axon diameter in idealized and practical conditions. METHODS: Simulations on a simple two‐compartment white matter model (with nonpermeable cylinder...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25809657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25631 |
_version_ | 1782446751861440512 |
---|---|
author | Drobnjak, Ivana Zhang, Hui Ianuş, Andrada Kaden, Enrico Alexander, Daniel C |
author_facet | Drobnjak, Ivana Zhang, Hui Ianuş, Andrada Kaden, Enrico Alexander, Daniel C |
author_sort | Drobnjak, Ivana |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To identify optimal pulsed gradient spin‐echo (PGSE) and oscillating gradient spin‐echo (OGSE) sequence settings for maximizing sensitivity to axon diameter in idealized and practical conditions. METHODS: Simulations on a simple two‐compartment white matter model (with nonpermeable cylinders) are used to investigate a wide space of clinically plausible PGSE and OGSE sequence parameters with trapezoidal diffusion gradient waveforms. Signal sensitivity is measured as a derivative of the signal with respect to axon diameter. Models of parallel and dispersed fibers are investigated separately to represent idealized and practical conditions. RESULTS: Simulations show that, for the simple case of gradients perfectly perpendicular to straight parallel fibers, PGSE always gives maximum sensitivity. However, in real‐world scenarios where fibers have unknown and dispersed orientation, low‐frequency OGSE provides higher sensitivity. Maximum sensitivity results show that on current clinical scanners (G (max) = 60 mT/m, signal to noise ratio (SNR) = 20) axon diameters below 6 µm are indistinguishable from zero. Scanners with stronger gradient systems such as the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Connectom scanner (G (max) = 300 mT/m) can extend this sensitivity limit down to 2–3 µm, probing a much greater proportion of the underlying axon diameter distribution. CONCLUSION: Low‐frequency OGSE provides additional sensitivity to PGSE in practical situations. OGSE is particularly advantageous for systems with high performance gradients. Magn Reson Med 75:688–700, 2016. © 2015 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4975609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49756092016-08-23 PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study Drobnjak, Ivana Zhang, Hui Ianuş, Andrada Kaden, Enrico Alexander, Daniel C Magn Reson Med Imaging Methodology—Full Papers PURPOSE: To identify optimal pulsed gradient spin‐echo (PGSE) and oscillating gradient spin‐echo (OGSE) sequence settings for maximizing sensitivity to axon diameter in idealized and practical conditions. METHODS: Simulations on a simple two‐compartment white matter model (with nonpermeable cylinders) are used to investigate a wide space of clinically plausible PGSE and OGSE sequence parameters with trapezoidal diffusion gradient waveforms. Signal sensitivity is measured as a derivative of the signal with respect to axon diameter. Models of parallel and dispersed fibers are investigated separately to represent idealized and practical conditions. RESULTS: Simulations show that, for the simple case of gradients perfectly perpendicular to straight parallel fibers, PGSE always gives maximum sensitivity. However, in real‐world scenarios where fibers have unknown and dispersed orientation, low‐frequency OGSE provides higher sensitivity. Maximum sensitivity results show that on current clinical scanners (G (max) = 60 mT/m, signal to noise ratio (SNR) = 20) axon diameters below 6 µm are indistinguishable from zero. Scanners with stronger gradient systems such as the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Connectom scanner (G (max) = 300 mT/m) can extend this sensitivity limit down to 2–3 µm, probing a much greater proportion of the underlying axon diameter distribution. CONCLUSION: Low‐frequency OGSE provides additional sensitivity to PGSE in practical situations. OGSE is particularly advantageous for systems with high performance gradients. Magn Reson Med 75:688–700, 2016. © 2015 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-03-25 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4975609/ /pubmed/25809657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25631 Text en © 2015 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Imaging Methodology—Full Papers Drobnjak, Ivana Zhang, Hui Ianuş, Andrada Kaden, Enrico Alexander, Daniel C PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study |
title |
PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study |
title_full |
PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study |
title_fullStr |
PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study |
title_full_unstemmed |
PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study |
title_short |
PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study |
title_sort | pgse, ogse, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion mri: insight from a simulation study |
topic | Imaging Methodology—Full Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25809657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drobnjakivana pgseogseandsensitivitytoaxondiameterindiffusionmriinsightfromasimulationstudy AT zhanghui pgseogseandsensitivitytoaxondiameterindiffusionmriinsightfromasimulationstudy AT ianusandrada pgseogseandsensitivitytoaxondiameterindiffusionmriinsightfromasimulationstudy AT kadenenrico pgseogseandsensitivitytoaxondiameterindiffusionmriinsightfromasimulationstudy AT alexanderdanielc pgseogseandsensitivitytoaxondiameterindiffusionmriinsightfromasimulationstudy |