Cargando…

PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study

PURPOSE: To identify optimal pulsed gradient spin‐echo (PGSE) and oscillating gradient spin‐echo (OGSE) sequence settings for maximizing sensitivity to axon diameter in idealized and practical conditions. METHODS: Simulations on a simple two‐compartment white matter model (with nonpermeable cylinder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drobnjak, Ivana, Zhang, Hui, Ianuş, Andrada, Kaden, Enrico, Alexander, Daniel C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25809657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25631
_version_ 1782446751861440512
author Drobnjak, Ivana
Zhang, Hui
Ianuş, Andrada
Kaden, Enrico
Alexander, Daniel C
author_facet Drobnjak, Ivana
Zhang, Hui
Ianuş, Andrada
Kaden, Enrico
Alexander, Daniel C
author_sort Drobnjak, Ivana
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To identify optimal pulsed gradient spin‐echo (PGSE) and oscillating gradient spin‐echo (OGSE) sequence settings for maximizing sensitivity to axon diameter in idealized and practical conditions. METHODS: Simulations on a simple two‐compartment white matter model (with nonpermeable cylinders) are used to investigate a wide space of clinically plausible PGSE and OGSE sequence parameters with trapezoidal diffusion gradient waveforms. Signal sensitivity is measured as a derivative of the signal with respect to axon diameter. Models of parallel and dispersed fibers are investigated separately to represent idealized and practical conditions. RESULTS: Simulations show that, for the simple case of gradients perfectly perpendicular to straight parallel fibers, PGSE always gives maximum sensitivity. However, in real‐world scenarios where fibers have unknown and dispersed orientation, low‐frequency OGSE provides higher sensitivity. Maximum sensitivity results show that on current clinical scanners (G (max) = 60 mT/m, signal to noise ratio (SNR) = 20) axon diameters below 6 µm are indistinguishable from zero. Scanners with stronger gradient systems such as the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Connectom scanner (G (max) = 300 mT/m) can extend this sensitivity limit down to 2–3 µm, probing a much greater proportion of the underlying axon diameter distribution. CONCLUSION: Low‐frequency OGSE provides additional sensitivity to PGSE in practical situations. OGSE is particularly advantageous for systems with high performance gradients. Magn Reson Med 75:688–700, 2016. © 2015 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4975609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49756092016-08-23 PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study Drobnjak, Ivana Zhang, Hui Ianuş, Andrada Kaden, Enrico Alexander, Daniel C Magn Reson Med Imaging Methodology—Full Papers PURPOSE: To identify optimal pulsed gradient spin‐echo (PGSE) and oscillating gradient spin‐echo (OGSE) sequence settings for maximizing sensitivity to axon diameter in idealized and practical conditions. METHODS: Simulations on a simple two‐compartment white matter model (with nonpermeable cylinders) are used to investigate a wide space of clinically plausible PGSE and OGSE sequence parameters with trapezoidal diffusion gradient waveforms. Signal sensitivity is measured as a derivative of the signal with respect to axon diameter. Models of parallel and dispersed fibers are investigated separately to represent idealized and practical conditions. RESULTS: Simulations show that, for the simple case of gradients perfectly perpendicular to straight parallel fibers, PGSE always gives maximum sensitivity. However, in real‐world scenarios where fibers have unknown and dispersed orientation, low‐frequency OGSE provides higher sensitivity. Maximum sensitivity results show that on current clinical scanners (G (max) = 60 mT/m, signal to noise ratio (SNR) = 20) axon diameters below 6 µm are indistinguishable from zero. Scanners with stronger gradient systems such as the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Connectom scanner (G (max) = 300 mT/m) can extend this sensitivity limit down to 2–3 µm, probing a much greater proportion of the underlying axon diameter distribution. CONCLUSION: Low‐frequency OGSE provides additional sensitivity to PGSE in practical situations. OGSE is particularly advantageous for systems with high performance gradients. Magn Reson Med 75:688–700, 2016. © 2015 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-03-25 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4975609/ /pubmed/25809657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25631 Text en © 2015 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Imaging Methodology—Full Papers
Drobnjak, Ivana
Zhang, Hui
Ianuş, Andrada
Kaden, Enrico
Alexander, Daniel C
PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study
title PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study
title_full PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study
title_fullStr PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study
title_full_unstemmed PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study
title_short PGSE, OGSE, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion MRI: Insight from a simulation study
title_sort pgse, ogse, and sensitivity to axon diameter in diffusion mri: insight from a simulation study
topic Imaging Methodology—Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25809657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25631
work_keys_str_mv AT drobnjakivana pgseogseandsensitivitytoaxondiameterindiffusionmriinsightfromasimulationstudy
AT zhanghui pgseogseandsensitivitytoaxondiameterindiffusionmriinsightfromasimulationstudy
AT ianusandrada pgseogseandsensitivitytoaxondiameterindiffusionmriinsightfromasimulationstudy
AT kadenenrico pgseogseandsensitivitytoaxondiameterindiffusionmriinsightfromasimulationstudy
AT alexanderdanielc pgseogseandsensitivitytoaxondiameterindiffusionmriinsightfromasimulationstudy