Cargando…
Mesenchymal stem cell response to topographically modified CoCrMo
Surface roughness on implant materials has been shown to be highly influential on the behavior of osteogenic cells. Four surface topographies were engineered on cobalt chromium molybdenum (CoCrMo) in order to examine this influence on human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). These treatments were smooth...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26015290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35514 |
_version_ | 1782446758503120896 |
---|---|
author | Logan, Niall Bozec, Laurent Traynor, Alison Brett, Peter |
author_facet | Logan, Niall Bozec, Laurent Traynor, Alison Brett, Peter |
author_sort | Logan, Niall |
collection | PubMed |
description | Surface roughness on implant materials has been shown to be highly influential on the behavior of osteogenic cells. Four surface topographies were engineered on cobalt chromium molybdenum (CoCrMo) in order to examine this influence on human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). These treatments were smooth polished (SMO), acid etched (AE) using HCl 7.4% and H(2)SO(4) 76% followed by HNO(3) 30%, sand blasted, and acid etched using either 50 μm Al(2)O(3) (SLA50) or 250 μm Al(2)O(3) grit (SLA250). Characterization of the surfaces included energy dispersive X‐ray analysis (EDX), contact angle, and surface roughness analysis. Human MSCs were cultured onto the four CoCrMo substrates and markers of cell attachment, retention, proliferation, cytotoxicity, and osteogenic differentiation were studied. Residual aluminum was observed on both SLA surfaces although this appeared to be more widely spread on SLA50, whilst SLA250 was shown to have the roughest topography with an R (a) value greater than 1 μm. All substrates were shown to be largely non‐cytotoxic although both SLA surfaces were shown to reduce cell attachment, whilst SLA50 also delayed cell proliferation. In contrast, SLA250 stimulated a good rate of proliferation resulting in the largest cell population by day 21. In addition, SLA250 stimulated enhanced cell retention, calcium deposition, and hydroxyapatite formation compared to SMO (p < 0.05). The enhanced response stimulated by SLA250 surface modification may prove advantageous for increasing the bioactivity of implants formed of CoCrMo. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 103A: 3747–3756, 2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4975717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49757172016-08-17 Mesenchymal stem cell response to topographically modified CoCrMo Logan, Niall Bozec, Laurent Traynor, Alison Brett, Peter J Biomed Mater Res A Original Articles Surface roughness on implant materials has been shown to be highly influential on the behavior of osteogenic cells. Four surface topographies were engineered on cobalt chromium molybdenum (CoCrMo) in order to examine this influence on human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). These treatments were smooth polished (SMO), acid etched (AE) using HCl 7.4% and H(2)SO(4) 76% followed by HNO(3) 30%, sand blasted, and acid etched using either 50 μm Al(2)O(3) (SLA50) or 250 μm Al(2)O(3) grit (SLA250). Characterization of the surfaces included energy dispersive X‐ray analysis (EDX), contact angle, and surface roughness analysis. Human MSCs were cultured onto the four CoCrMo substrates and markers of cell attachment, retention, proliferation, cytotoxicity, and osteogenic differentiation were studied. Residual aluminum was observed on both SLA surfaces although this appeared to be more widely spread on SLA50, whilst SLA250 was shown to have the roughest topography with an R (a) value greater than 1 μm. All substrates were shown to be largely non‐cytotoxic although both SLA surfaces were shown to reduce cell attachment, whilst SLA50 also delayed cell proliferation. In contrast, SLA250 stimulated a good rate of proliferation resulting in the largest cell population by day 21. In addition, SLA250 stimulated enhanced cell retention, calcium deposition, and hydroxyapatite formation compared to SMO (p < 0.05). The enhanced response stimulated by SLA250 surface modification may prove advantageous for increasing the bioactivity of implants formed of CoCrMo. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 103A: 3747–3756, 2015. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06-19 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4975717/ /pubmed/26015290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35514 Text en © 2015 The Authors Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Logan, Niall Bozec, Laurent Traynor, Alison Brett, Peter Mesenchymal stem cell response to topographically modified CoCrMo |
title | Mesenchymal stem cell response to topographically modified CoCrMo |
title_full | Mesenchymal stem cell response to topographically modified CoCrMo |
title_fullStr | Mesenchymal stem cell response to topographically modified CoCrMo |
title_full_unstemmed | Mesenchymal stem cell response to topographically modified CoCrMo |
title_short | Mesenchymal stem cell response to topographically modified CoCrMo |
title_sort | mesenchymal stem cell response to topographically modified cocrmo |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26015290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35514 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loganniall mesenchymalstemcellresponsetotopographicallymodifiedcocrmo AT bozeclaurent mesenchymalstemcellresponsetotopographicallymodifiedcocrmo AT traynoralison mesenchymalstemcellresponsetotopographicallymodifiedcocrmo AT brettpeter mesenchymalstemcellresponsetotopographicallymodifiedcocrmo |