Cargando…

The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health and human rights concern, though there is limited evidence on how to prevent it. This secondary analysis of data from the SASA! Study assesses the potential of a community mobilisation IPV prevention intervention to reduce overall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abramsky, Tanya, Devries, Karen M, Michau, Lori, Nakuti, Janet, Musuya, Tina, Kyegombe, Nambusi, Watts, Charlotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26873948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206665
_version_ 1782446774234906624
author Abramsky, Tanya
Devries, Karen M
Michau, Lori
Nakuti, Janet
Musuya, Tina
Kyegombe, Nambusi
Watts, Charlotte
author_facet Abramsky, Tanya
Devries, Karen M
Michau, Lori
Nakuti, Janet
Musuya, Tina
Kyegombe, Nambusi
Watts, Charlotte
author_sort Abramsky, Tanya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health and human rights concern, though there is limited evidence on how to prevent it. This secondary analysis of data from the SASA! Study assesses the potential of a community mobilisation IPV prevention intervention to reduce overall prevalence of IPV, new onset of abuse (primary prevention) and continuation of prior abuse (secondary prevention). METHODS: A pair-matched cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 8 communities (4 intervention, 4 control) in Kampala, Uganda (2007–2012). Cross-sectional surveys of community members, 18–49 years old, were undertaken at baseline (n=1583) and 4 years postintervention implementation (n=2532). Outcomes relate to women's past year experiences of physical and sexual IPV, emotional aggression, controlling behaviours and fear of partner. An adjusted cluster-level intention-to-treat analysis compared outcomes in intervention and control communities at follow-up. RESULTS: At follow-up, all types of IPV (including severe forms of each) were lower in intervention communities compared with control communities. SASA! was associated with lower onset of abuse and lower continuation of prior abuse. Statistically significant effects were observed for continued physical IPV (adjusted risk ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96); continued sexual IPV (0.68, 0.53 to 0.87); continued emotional aggression (0.68, 0.52 to 0.89); continued fear of partner (0.67, 0.51 to 0.89); and new onset of controlling behaviours (0.38, 0.23 to 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Community mobilisation is an effective means for both primary and secondary prevention of IPV. Further support should be given to the replication and scale up of SASA! and other similar interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00790959
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4975800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49758002016-08-18 The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda Abramsky, Tanya Devries, Karen M Michau, Lori Nakuti, Janet Musuya, Tina Kyegombe, Nambusi Watts, Charlotte J Epidemiol Community Health Other Topics BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health and human rights concern, though there is limited evidence on how to prevent it. This secondary analysis of data from the SASA! Study assesses the potential of a community mobilisation IPV prevention intervention to reduce overall prevalence of IPV, new onset of abuse (primary prevention) and continuation of prior abuse (secondary prevention). METHODS: A pair-matched cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 8 communities (4 intervention, 4 control) in Kampala, Uganda (2007–2012). Cross-sectional surveys of community members, 18–49 years old, were undertaken at baseline (n=1583) and 4 years postintervention implementation (n=2532). Outcomes relate to women's past year experiences of physical and sexual IPV, emotional aggression, controlling behaviours and fear of partner. An adjusted cluster-level intention-to-treat analysis compared outcomes in intervention and control communities at follow-up. RESULTS: At follow-up, all types of IPV (including severe forms of each) were lower in intervention communities compared with control communities. SASA! was associated with lower onset of abuse and lower continuation of prior abuse. Statistically significant effects were observed for continued physical IPV (adjusted risk ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96); continued sexual IPV (0.68, 0.53 to 0.87); continued emotional aggression (0.68, 0.52 to 0.89); continued fear of partner (0.67, 0.51 to 0.89); and new onset of controlling behaviours (0.38, 0.23 to 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Community mobilisation is an effective means for both primary and secondary prevention of IPV. Further support should be given to the replication and scale up of SASA! and other similar interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00790959 BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08 2016-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4975800/ /pubmed/26873948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206665 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Other Topics
Abramsky, Tanya
Devries, Karen M
Michau, Lori
Nakuti, Janet
Musuya, Tina
Kyegombe, Nambusi
Watts, Charlotte
The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda
title The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda
title_full The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda
title_fullStr The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda
title_full_unstemmed The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda
title_short The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda
title_sort impact of sasa!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in kampala, uganda
topic Other Topics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26873948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206665
work_keys_str_mv AT abramskytanya theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT devrieskarenm theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT michaulori theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT nakutijanet theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT musuyatina theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT kyegombenambusi theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT wattscharlotte theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT abramskytanya impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT devrieskarenm impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT michaulori impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT nakutijanet impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT musuyatina impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT kyegombenambusi impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda
AT wattscharlotte impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda