Cargando…
The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda
BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health and human rights concern, though there is limited evidence on how to prevent it. This secondary analysis of data from the SASA! Study assesses the potential of a community mobilisation IPV prevention intervention to reduce overall...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26873948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206665 |
_version_ | 1782446774234906624 |
---|---|
author | Abramsky, Tanya Devries, Karen M Michau, Lori Nakuti, Janet Musuya, Tina Kyegombe, Nambusi Watts, Charlotte |
author_facet | Abramsky, Tanya Devries, Karen M Michau, Lori Nakuti, Janet Musuya, Tina Kyegombe, Nambusi Watts, Charlotte |
author_sort | Abramsky, Tanya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health and human rights concern, though there is limited evidence on how to prevent it. This secondary analysis of data from the SASA! Study assesses the potential of a community mobilisation IPV prevention intervention to reduce overall prevalence of IPV, new onset of abuse (primary prevention) and continuation of prior abuse (secondary prevention). METHODS: A pair-matched cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 8 communities (4 intervention, 4 control) in Kampala, Uganda (2007–2012). Cross-sectional surveys of community members, 18–49 years old, were undertaken at baseline (n=1583) and 4 years postintervention implementation (n=2532). Outcomes relate to women's past year experiences of physical and sexual IPV, emotional aggression, controlling behaviours and fear of partner. An adjusted cluster-level intention-to-treat analysis compared outcomes in intervention and control communities at follow-up. RESULTS: At follow-up, all types of IPV (including severe forms of each) were lower in intervention communities compared with control communities. SASA! was associated with lower onset of abuse and lower continuation of prior abuse. Statistically significant effects were observed for continued physical IPV (adjusted risk ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96); continued sexual IPV (0.68, 0.53 to 0.87); continued emotional aggression (0.68, 0.52 to 0.89); continued fear of partner (0.67, 0.51 to 0.89); and new onset of controlling behaviours (0.38, 0.23 to 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Community mobilisation is an effective means for both primary and secondary prevention of IPV. Further support should be given to the replication and scale up of SASA! and other similar interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00790959 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4975800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49758002016-08-18 The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda Abramsky, Tanya Devries, Karen M Michau, Lori Nakuti, Janet Musuya, Tina Kyegombe, Nambusi Watts, Charlotte J Epidemiol Community Health Other Topics BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health and human rights concern, though there is limited evidence on how to prevent it. This secondary analysis of data from the SASA! Study assesses the potential of a community mobilisation IPV prevention intervention to reduce overall prevalence of IPV, new onset of abuse (primary prevention) and continuation of prior abuse (secondary prevention). METHODS: A pair-matched cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 8 communities (4 intervention, 4 control) in Kampala, Uganda (2007–2012). Cross-sectional surveys of community members, 18–49 years old, were undertaken at baseline (n=1583) and 4 years postintervention implementation (n=2532). Outcomes relate to women's past year experiences of physical and sexual IPV, emotional aggression, controlling behaviours and fear of partner. An adjusted cluster-level intention-to-treat analysis compared outcomes in intervention and control communities at follow-up. RESULTS: At follow-up, all types of IPV (including severe forms of each) were lower in intervention communities compared with control communities. SASA! was associated with lower onset of abuse and lower continuation of prior abuse. Statistically significant effects were observed for continued physical IPV (adjusted risk ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96); continued sexual IPV (0.68, 0.53 to 0.87); continued emotional aggression (0.68, 0.52 to 0.89); continued fear of partner (0.67, 0.51 to 0.89); and new onset of controlling behaviours (0.38, 0.23 to 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Community mobilisation is an effective means for both primary and secondary prevention of IPV. Further support should be given to the replication and scale up of SASA! and other similar interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00790959 BMJ Publishing Group 2016-08 2016-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4975800/ /pubmed/26873948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206665 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Other Topics Abramsky, Tanya Devries, Karen M Michau, Lori Nakuti, Janet Musuya, Tina Kyegombe, Nambusi Watts, Charlotte The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda |
title | The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda |
title_full | The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda |
title_fullStr | The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda |
title_short | The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda |
title_sort | impact of sasa!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in kampala, uganda |
topic | Other Topics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26873948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206665 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abramskytanya theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT devrieskarenm theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT michaulori theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT nakutijanet theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT musuyatina theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT kyegombenambusi theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT wattscharlotte theimpactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT abramskytanya impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT devrieskarenm impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT michaulori impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT nakutijanet impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT musuyatina impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT kyegombenambusi impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda AT wattscharlotte impactofsasaacommunitymobilisationinterventiononwomensexperiencesofintimatepartnerviolencesecondaryfindingsfromaclusterrandomisedtrialinkampalauganda |