Cargando…

Passive immunization does not provide protection against experimental infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis

Mycoplasma haemofelis (Mhf) is the most pathogenic feline hemotropic mycoplasma. Cats infected with Mhf that clear bacteremia are protected from Mhf reinfection, but the mechanisms of protective immunity are unresolved. In the present study we investigated whether the passive transfer of antibodies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugiarto, Sarah, Spiri, Andrea M., Riond, Barbara, Novacco, Marilisa, Oestmann, Angelina, de Miranda, Luisa H. Monteiro, Meli, Marina L., Boretti, Felicitas S., Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina, Willi, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27496124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-016-0361-x
_version_ 1782446798939357184
author Sugiarto, Sarah
Spiri, Andrea M.
Riond, Barbara
Novacco, Marilisa
Oestmann, Angelina
de Miranda, Luisa H. Monteiro
Meli, Marina L.
Boretti, Felicitas S.
Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina
Willi, Barbara
author_facet Sugiarto, Sarah
Spiri, Andrea M.
Riond, Barbara
Novacco, Marilisa
Oestmann, Angelina
de Miranda, Luisa H. Monteiro
Meli, Marina L.
Boretti, Felicitas S.
Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina
Willi, Barbara
author_sort Sugiarto, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Mycoplasma haemofelis (Mhf) is the most pathogenic feline hemotropic mycoplasma. Cats infected with Mhf that clear bacteremia are protected from Mhf reinfection, but the mechanisms of protective immunity are unresolved. In the present study we investigated whether the passive transfer of antibodies from Mhf-recovered cats to naïve recipient cats provided protection against bacteremia and clinical disease following homologous challenge with Mhf; moreover, we characterized the immune response in the recipient cats. Ten specified pathogen-free (SPF) cats were transfused with pooled plasma from cats that had cleared Mhf bacteremia; five control cats received plasma from naïve SPF cats. After homologous challenge with Mhf, cats were monitored for 100 days using quantitative PCR, hematology, blood biochemistry, Coombs testing, flow cytometry, DnaK ELISA, and red blood cell (RBC) osmotic fragility (OF) measurement. Passively immunized cats were not protected against Mhf infection but, compared to control cats, showed significantly higher RBC OF and B lymphocyte (CD45R/B220(+)) counts and occasionally higher lymphocyte, monocyte and activated CD4(+) T lymphocyte (CD4(+)CD25(+)) counts; they also showed higher bilirubin, total protein and globulin levels compared to those of control cats. At times of peak bacteremia, a decrease in eosinophils and lymphocytes, as well as subsets thereof (B lymphocytes and CD5(+), CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes), and an increase in monocytes were particularly significant in the passively immunized cats. In conclusion, passive immunization does not prevent bacteremia and clinical disease following homologous challenge with Mhf, but enhances RBC osmotic fragility and induces a pronounced immune response. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13567-016-0361-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4975915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49759152016-08-07 Passive immunization does not provide protection against experimental infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis Sugiarto, Sarah Spiri, Andrea M. Riond, Barbara Novacco, Marilisa Oestmann, Angelina de Miranda, Luisa H. Monteiro Meli, Marina L. Boretti, Felicitas S. Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina Willi, Barbara Vet Res Research Article Mycoplasma haemofelis (Mhf) is the most pathogenic feline hemotropic mycoplasma. Cats infected with Mhf that clear bacteremia are protected from Mhf reinfection, but the mechanisms of protective immunity are unresolved. In the present study we investigated whether the passive transfer of antibodies from Mhf-recovered cats to naïve recipient cats provided protection against bacteremia and clinical disease following homologous challenge with Mhf; moreover, we characterized the immune response in the recipient cats. Ten specified pathogen-free (SPF) cats were transfused with pooled plasma from cats that had cleared Mhf bacteremia; five control cats received plasma from naïve SPF cats. After homologous challenge with Mhf, cats were monitored for 100 days using quantitative PCR, hematology, blood biochemistry, Coombs testing, flow cytometry, DnaK ELISA, and red blood cell (RBC) osmotic fragility (OF) measurement. Passively immunized cats were not protected against Mhf infection but, compared to control cats, showed significantly higher RBC OF and B lymphocyte (CD45R/B220(+)) counts and occasionally higher lymphocyte, monocyte and activated CD4(+) T lymphocyte (CD4(+)CD25(+)) counts; they also showed higher bilirubin, total protein and globulin levels compared to those of control cats. At times of peak bacteremia, a decrease in eosinophils and lymphocytes, as well as subsets thereof (B lymphocytes and CD5(+), CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes), and an increase in monocytes were particularly significant in the passively immunized cats. In conclusion, passive immunization does not prevent bacteremia and clinical disease following homologous challenge with Mhf, but enhances RBC osmotic fragility and induces a pronounced immune response. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13567-016-0361-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-05 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4975915/ /pubmed/27496124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-016-0361-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sugiarto, Sarah
Spiri, Andrea M.
Riond, Barbara
Novacco, Marilisa
Oestmann, Angelina
de Miranda, Luisa H. Monteiro
Meli, Marina L.
Boretti, Felicitas S.
Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina
Willi, Barbara
Passive immunization does not provide protection against experimental infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis
title Passive immunization does not provide protection against experimental infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis
title_full Passive immunization does not provide protection against experimental infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis
title_fullStr Passive immunization does not provide protection against experimental infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis
title_full_unstemmed Passive immunization does not provide protection against experimental infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis
title_short Passive immunization does not provide protection against experimental infection with Mycoplasma haemofelis
title_sort passive immunization does not provide protection against experimental infection with mycoplasma haemofelis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27496124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-016-0361-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sugiartosarah passiveimmunizationdoesnotprovideprotectionagainstexperimentalinfectionwithmycoplasmahaemofelis
AT spiriandream passiveimmunizationdoesnotprovideprotectionagainstexperimentalinfectionwithmycoplasmahaemofelis
AT riondbarbara passiveimmunizationdoesnotprovideprotectionagainstexperimentalinfectionwithmycoplasmahaemofelis
AT novaccomarilisa passiveimmunizationdoesnotprovideprotectionagainstexperimentalinfectionwithmycoplasmahaemofelis
AT oestmannangelina passiveimmunizationdoesnotprovideprotectionagainstexperimentalinfectionwithmycoplasmahaemofelis
AT demirandaluisahmonteiro passiveimmunizationdoesnotprovideprotectionagainstexperimentalinfectionwithmycoplasmahaemofelis
AT melimarinal passiveimmunizationdoesnotprovideprotectionagainstexperimentalinfectionwithmycoplasmahaemofelis
AT borettifelicitass passiveimmunizationdoesnotprovideprotectionagainstexperimentalinfectionwithmycoplasmahaemofelis
AT hofmannlehmannregina passiveimmunizationdoesnotprovideprotectionagainstexperimentalinfectionwithmycoplasmahaemofelis
AT willibarbara passiveimmunizationdoesnotprovideprotectionagainstexperimentalinfectionwithmycoplasmahaemofelis