Cargando…

A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison

The commingling of human remains often hinders forensic/physical anthropologists during the identification process, as there are limited methods to accurately sort these remains. This study investigates a new method for pair-matching, a common individualization technique, which uses digital three-di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karell, Mara A., Langstaff, Helen K., Halazonetis, Demetrios J., Minghetti, Caterina, Frelat, Mélanie, Kranioti, Elena F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1334-3
_version_ 1782446801765269504
author Karell, Mara A.
Langstaff, Helen K.
Halazonetis, Demetrios J.
Minghetti, Caterina
Frelat, Mélanie
Kranioti, Elena F.
author_facet Karell, Mara A.
Langstaff, Helen K.
Halazonetis, Demetrios J.
Minghetti, Caterina
Frelat, Mélanie
Kranioti, Elena F.
author_sort Karell, Mara A.
collection PubMed
description The commingling of human remains often hinders forensic/physical anthropologists during the identification process, as there are limited methods to accurately sort these remains. This study investigates a new method for pair-matching, a common individualization technique, which uses digital three-dimensional models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison (MVC). The MVC method digitally compares the entire three-dimensional geometry of two bones at once to produce a single value to indicate their similarity. Two different versions of this method, one manual and the other automated, were created and then tested for how well they accurately pair-matched humeri. Each version was assessed using sensitivity and specificity. The manual mesh-to-mesh value comparison method was 100 % sensitive and 100 % specific. The automated mesh-to-mesh value comparison method was 95 % sensitive and 60 % specific. Our results indicate that the mesh-to-mesh value comparison method overall is a powerful new tool for accurately pair-matching commingled skeletal elements, although the automated version still needs improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00414-016-1334-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4976056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49760562016-08-18 A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison Karell, Mara A. Langstaff, Helen K. Halazonetis, Demetrios J. Minghetti, Caterina Frelat, Mélanie Kranioti, Elena F. Int J Legal Med Original Article The commingling of human remains often hinders forensic/physical anthropologists during the identification process, as there are limited methods to accurately sort these remains. This study investigates a new method for pair-matching, a common individualization technique, which uses digital three-dimensional models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison (MVC). The MVC method digitally compares the entire three-dimensional geometry of two bones at once to produce a single value to indicate their similarity. Two different versions of this method, one manual and the other automated, were created and then tested for how well they accurately pair-matched humeri. Each version was assessed using sensitivity and specificity. The manual mesh-to-mesh value comparison method was 100 % sensitive and 100 % specific. The automated mesh-to-mesh value comparison method was 95 % sensitive and 60 % specific. Our results indicate that the mesh-to-mesh value comparison method overall is a powerful new tool for accurately pair-matching commingled skeletal elements, although the automated version still needs improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00414-016-1334-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-03-10 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4976056/ /pubmed/26966098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1334-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Karell, Mara A.
Langstaff, Helen K.
Halazonetis, Demetrios J.
Minghetti, Caterina
Frelat, Mélanie
Kranioti, Elena F.
A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison
title A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison
title_full A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison
title_fullStr A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison
title_full_unstemmed A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison
title_short A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison
title_sort novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1334-3
work_keys_str_mv AT karellmaraa anovelmethodforpairmatchingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodelsofbonemeshtomeshvaluecomparison
AT langstaffhelenk anovelmethodforpairmatchingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodelsofbonemeshtomeshvaluecomparison
AT halazonetisdemetriosj anovelmethodforpairmatchingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodelsofbonemeshtomeshvaluecomparison
AT minghetticaterina anovelmethodforpairmatchingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodelsofbonemeshtomeshvaluecomparison
AT frelatmelanie anovelmethodforpairmatchingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodelsofbonemeshtomeshvaluecomparison
AT kraniotielenaf anovelmethodforpairmatchingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodelsofbonemeshtomeshvaluecomparison
AT karellmaraa novelmethodforpairmatchingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodelsofbonemeshtomeshvaluecomparison
AT langstaffhelenk novelmethodforpairmatchingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodelsofbonemeshtomeshvaluecomparison
AT halazonetisdemetriosj novelmethodforpairmatchingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodelsofbonemeshtomeshvaluecomparison
AT minghetticaterina novelmethodforpairmatchingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodelsofbonemeshtomeshvaluecomparison
AT frelatmelanie novelmethodforpairmatchingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodelsofbonemeshtomeshvaluecomparison
AT kraniotielenaf novelmethodforpairmatchingusingthreedimensionaldigitalmodelsofbonemeshtomeshvaluecomparison