Cargando…

Comparison of porcine thorax to gelatine blocks for wound ballistics studies

Tissue simulants are typically used in ballistic testing as substitutes for biological tissues. Many simulants have been used, with gelatine amongst the most common. While two concentrations of gelatine (10 and 20 %) have been used extensively, no agreed standard exists for the preparation of either...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mabbott, A., Carr, D. J., Champion, S., Malbon, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26846765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1309-9
_version_ 1782446802217205760
author Mabbott, A.
Carr, D. J.
Champion, S.
Malbon, C.
author_facet Mabbott, A.
Carr, D. J.
Champion, S.
Malbon, C.
author_sort Mabbott, A.
collection PubMed
description Tissue simulants are typically used in ballistic testing as substitutes for biological tissues. Many simulants have been used, with gelatine amongst the most common. While two concentrations of gelatine (10 and 20 %) have been used extensively, no agreed standard exists for the preparation of either. Comparison of ballistic damage produced in both concentrations is lacking. The damage produced in gelatine is also questioned, with regards to what it would mean for specific areas of living tissue. The aim of the work discussed in this paper was to consider how damage caused by selected pistol and rifle ammunition varied in different simulants. Damage to gelatine blocks 10 and 20 % in concentration were tested with 9 mm Luger (9 × 19 full metal jacket; FMJ) rounds, while damage produced by .223 Remington (5.56 × 45 Federal Premium® Tactical® Bonded®) rounds to porcine thorax sections (skin, underlying tissue, ribs, lungs, ribs, underlying tissue, skin; backed by a block of 10 % gelatine) were compared to 10 and 20 % gelatine blocks. Results from the .223 Remington rifle round, which is one that typically expands on impact, revealed depths of penetration in the thorax arrangement were significantly different to 20 % gelatine, but not 10 % gelatine. The level of damage produced in the simulated thoraxes was smaller in scale to that witnessed in both gelatine concentrations, though greater debris was produced in the thoraxes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00414-015-1309-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4976058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49760582016-08-18 Comparison of porcine thorax to gelatine blocks for wound ballistics studies Mabbott, A. Carr, D. J. Champion, S. Malbon, C. Int J Legal Med Original Article Tissue simulants are typically used in ballistic testing as substitutes for biological tissues. Many simulants have been used, with gelatine amongst the most common. While two concentrations of gelatine (10 and 20 %) have been used extensively, no agreed standard exists for the preparation of either. Comparison of ballistic damage produced in both concentrations is lacking. The damage produced in gelatine is also questioned, with regards to what it would mean for specific areas of living tissue. The aim of the work discussed in this paper was to consider how damage caused by selected pistol and rifle ammunition varied in different simulants. Damage to gelatine blocks 10 and 20 % in concentration were tested with 9 mm Luger (9 × 19 full metal jacket; FMJ) rounds, while damage produced by .223 Remington (5.56 × 45 Federal Premium® Tactical® Bonded®) rounds to porcine thorax sections (skin, underlying tissue, ribs, lungs, ribs, underlying tissue, skin; backed by a block of 10 % gelatine) were compared to 10 and 20 % gelatine blocks. Results from the .223 Remington rifle round, which is one that typically expands on impact, revealed depths of penetration in the thorax arrangement were significantly different to 20 % gelatine, but not 10 % gelatine. The level of damage produced in the simulated thoraxes was smaller in scale to that witnessed in both gelatine concentrations, though greater debris was produced in the thoraxes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00414-015-1309-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-02-04 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4976058/ /pubmed/26846765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1309-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mabbott, A.
Carr, D. J.
Champion, S.
Malbon, C.
Comparison of porcine thorax to gelatine blocks for wound ballistics studies
title Comparison of porcine thorax to gelatine blocks for wound ballistics studies
title_full Comparison of porcine thorax to gelatine blocks for wound ballistics studies
title_fullStr Comparison of porcine thorax to gelatine blocks for wound ballistics studies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of porcine thorax to gelatine blocks for wound ballistics studies
title_short Comparison of porcine thorax to gelatine blocks for wound ballistics studies
title_sort comparison of porcine thorax to gelatine blocks for wound ballistics studies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26846765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1309-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mabbotta comparisonofporcinethoraxtogelatineblocksforwoundballisticsstudies
AT carrdj comparisonofporcinethoraxtogelatineblocksforwoundballisticsstudies
AT champions comparisonofporcinethoraxtogelatineblocksforwoundballisticsstudies
AT malbonc comparisonofporcinethoraxtogelatineblocksforwoundballisticsstudies