Cargando…
Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene
Next-generation sequencing technologies have found a widespread use in the study of host–microbe interactions due to the increase in their throughput and their ever-decreasing costs. The analysis of human-associated microbial communities using a marker gene, particularly the 16S rRNA, has been great...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2016.00026 |
_version_ | 1782446808852594688 |
---|---|
author | de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jacobo Escobar, Juan S. |
author_facet | de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jacobo Escobar, Juan S. |
author_sort | de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jacobo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Next-generation sequencing technologies have found a widespread use in the study of host–microbe interactions due to the increase in their throughput and their ever-decreasing costs. The analysis of human-associated microbial communities using a marker gene, particularly the 16S rRNA, has been greatly benefited from these technologies – the human gut microbiome research being a remarkable example of such analysis that has greatly expanded our understanding of microbe-mediated human health and disease, metabolism, and food absorption. 16S studies go through a series of in vitro and in silico steps that can greatly influence their outcomes. However, the lack of a standardized workflow has led to uncertainties regarding the transparency and reproducibility of gut microbiome studies. We, here, discuss the most common challenges in the archetypical 16S rRNA workflow, including the extraction of total DNA, its use as template in PCR with primers that amplify specific hypervariable regions of the gene, amplicon sequencing, the denoising and removal of low-quality reads, the detection and removal of chimeric sequences, the clustering of high-quality sequences into operational taxonomic units, and their taxonomic classification. We recommend the essential technical information that should be conveyed in publications for reproducibility of results and encourage non-experts to include procedures and available tools that mitigate most of the problems encountered in microbiome analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4976105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49761052016-08-22 Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jacobo Escobar, Juan S. Front Nutr Nutrition Next-generation sequencing technologies have found a widespread use in the study of host–microbe interactions due to the increase in their throughput and their ever-decreasing costs. The analysis of human-associated microbial communities using a marker gene, particularly the 16S rRNA, has been greatly benefited from these technologies – the human gut microbiome research being a remarkable example of such analysis that has greatly expanded our understanding of microbe-mediated human health and disease, metabolism, and food absorption. 16S studies go through a series of in vitro and in silico steps that can greatly influence their outcomes. However, the lack of a standardized workflow has led to uncertainties regarding the transparency and reproducibility of gut microbiome studies. We, here, discuss the most common challenges in the archetypical 16S rRNA workflow, including the extraction of total DNA, its use as template in PCR with primers that amplify specific hypervariable regions of the gene, amplicon sequencing, the denoising and removal of low-quality reads, the detection and removal of chimeric sequences, the clustering of high-quality sequences into operational taxonomic units, and their taxonomic classification. We recommend the essential technical information that should be conveyed in publications for reproducibility of results and encourage non-experts to include procedures and available tools that mitigate most of the problems encountered in microbiome analysis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4976105/ /pubmed/27551678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2016.00026 Text en Copyright © 2016 de la Cuesta-Zuluaga and Escobar. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Nutrition de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jacobo Escobar, Juan S. Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene |
title | Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene |
title_full | Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene |
title_fullStr | Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene |
title_full_unstemmed | Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene |
title_short | Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene |
title_sort | considerations for optimizing microbiome analysis using a marker gene |
topic | Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2016.00026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delacuestazuluagajacobo considerationsforoptimizingmicrobiomeanalysisusingamarkergene AT escobarjuans considerationsforoptimizingmicrobiomeanalysisusingamarkergene |