Cargando…

Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene

Next-generation sequencing technologies have found a widespread use in the study of host–microbe interactions due to the increase in their throughput and their ever-decreasing costs. The analysis of human-associated microbial communities using a marker gene, particularly the 16S rRNA, has been great...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jacobo, Escobar, Juan S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2016.00026
_version_ 1782446808852594688
author de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jacobo
Escobar, Juan S.
author_facet de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jacobo
Escobar, Juan S.
author_sort de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jacobo
collection PubMed
description Next-generation sequencing technologies have found a widespread use in the study of host–microbe interactions due to the increase in their throughput and their ever-decreasing costs. The analysis of human-associated microbial communities using a marker gene, particularly the 16S rRNA, has been greatly benefited from these technologies – the human gut microbiome research being a remarkable example of such analysis that has greatly expanded our understanding of microbe-mediated human health and disease, metabolism, and food absorption. 16S studies go through a series of in vitro and in silico steps that can greatly influence their outcomes. However, the lack of a standardized workflow has led to uncertainties regarding the transparency and reproducibility of gut microbiome studies. We, here, discuss the most common challenges in the archetypical 16S rRNA workflow, including the extraction of total DNA, its use as template in PCR with primers that amplify specific hypervariable regions of the gene, amplicon sequencing, the denoising and removal of low-quality reads, the detection and removal of chimeric sequences, the clustering of high-quality sequences into operational taxonomic units, and their taxonomic classification. We recommend the essential technical information that should be conveyed in publications for reproducibility of results and encourage non-experts to include procedures and available tools that mitigate most of the problems encountered in microbiome analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4976105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49761052016-08-22 Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jacobo Escobar, Juan S. Front Nutr Nutrition Next-generation sequencing technologies have found a widespread use in the study of host–microbe interactions due to the increase in their throughput and their ever-decreasing costs. The analysis of human-associated microbial communities using a marker gene, particularly the 16S rRNA, has been greatly benefited from these technologies – the human gut microbiome research being a remarkable example of such analysis that has greatly expanded our understanding of microbe-mediated human health and disease, metabolism, and food absorption. 16S studies go through a series of in vitro and in silico steps that can greatly influence their outcomes. However, the lack of a standardized workflow has led to uncertainties regarding the transparency and reproducibility of gut microbiome studies. We, here, discuss the most common challenges in the archetypical 16S rRNA workflow, including the extraction of total DNA, its use as template in PCR with primers that amplify specific hypervariable regions of the gene, amplicon sequencing, the denoising and removal of low-quality reads, the detection and removal of chimeric sequences, the clustering of high-quality sequences into operational taxonomic units, and their taxonomic classification. We recommend the essential technical information that should be conveyed in publications for reproducibility of results and encourage non-experts to include procedures and available tools that mitigate most of the problems encountered in microbiome analysis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4976105/ /pubmed/27551678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2016.00026 Text en Copyright © 2016 de la Cuesta-Zuluaga and Escobar. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jacobo
Escobar, Juan S.
Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene
title Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene
title_full Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene
title_fullStr Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene
title_full_unstemmed Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene
title_short Considerations For Optimizing Microbiome Analysis Using a Marker Gene
title_sort considerations for optimizing microbiome analysis using a marker gene
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2016.00026
work_keys_str_mv AT delacuestazuluagajacobo considerationsforoptimizingmicrobiomeanalysisusingamarkergene
AT escobarjuans considerationsforoptimizingmicrobiomeanalysisusingamarkergene