Cargando…

Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids

Accurate estimation of food portion size is critical in dietary studies. Hands are potentially useful as portion size estimation aids; however, their accuracy has not been tested. The aim of the present study was to test the accuracy of a novel portion size estimation method using the width of the f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibson, Alice A., Hsu, Michelle S. H., Rangan, Anna M., Seimon, Radhika V., Lee, Crystal M. Y., Das, Arpita, Finch, Charles H., Sainsbury, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2016.22
_version_ 1782446812063334400
author Gibson, Alice A.
Hsu, Michelle S. H.
Rangan, Anna M.
Seimon, Radhika V.
Lee, Crystal M. Y.
Das, Arpita
Finch, Charles H.
Sainsbury, Amanda
author_facet Gibson, Alice A.
Hsu, Michelle S. H.
Rangan, Anna M.
Seimon, Radhika V.
Lee, Crystal M. Y.
Das, Arpita
Finch, Charles H.
Sainsbury, Amanda
author_sort Gibson, Alice A.
collection PubMed
description Accurate estimation of food portion size is critical in dietary studies. Hands are potentially useful as portion size estimation aids; however, their accuracy has not been tested. The aim of the present study was to test the accuracy of a novel portion size estimation method using the width of the fingers as a ‘ruler’ to measure the dimensions of foods (‘finger width method’), as well as fists and thumb or finger tips. These hand measures were also compared with household measures (cups and spoons). A total of sixty-seven participants (70 % female; age 32·7 (sd 13·7) years; BMI 23·2 (sd  3·5) kg/m(2)) attended a 1·5 h session in which they estimated the portion sizes of forty-two pre-weighed foods and liquids. Hand measurements were used in conjunction with geometric formulas to convert estimations to volumes. Volumes determined with hand and household methods were converted to estimated weights using density factors. Estimated weights were compared with true weights, and the percentage difference from the true weight was used to compare accuracy between the hand and household methods. Of geometrically shaped foods and liquids estimated with the finger width method, 80 % were within ±25 % of the true weight of the food, and 13 % were within ±10 %, in contrast to 29 % of those estimated with the household method being within ±25 % of the true weight of the food, and 8 % being within ±10 %. For foods that closely resemble a geometric shape, the finger width method provides a novel and acceptably accurate method of estimating portion size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4976119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49761192016-08-19 Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids Gibson, Alice A. Hsu, Michelle S. H. Rangan, Anna M. Seimon, Radhika V. Lee, Crystal M. Y. Das, Arpita Finch, Charles H. Sainsbury, Amanda J Nutr Sci Research Article Accurate estimation of food portion size is critical in dietary studies. Hands are potentially useful as portion size estimation aids; however, their accuracy has not been tested. The aim of the present study was to test the accuracy of a novel portion size estimation method using the width of the fingers as a ‘ruler’ to measure the dimensions of foods (‘finger width method’), as well as fists and thumb or finger tips. These hand measures were also compared with household measures (cups and spoons). A total of sixty-seven participants (70 % female; age 32·7 (sd 13·7) years; BMI 23·2 (sd  3·5) kg/m(2)) attended a 1·5 h session in which they estimated the portion sizes of forty-two pre-weighed foods and liquids. Hand measurements were used in conjunction with geometric formulas to convert estimations to volumes. Volumes determined with hand and household methods were converted to estimated weights using density factors. Estimated weights were compared with true weights, and the percentage difference from the true weight was used to compare accuracy between the hand and household methods. Of geometrically shaped foods and liquids estimated with the finger width method, 80 % were within ±25 % of the true weight of the food, and 13 % were within ±10 %, in contrast to 29 % of those estimated with the household method being within ±25 % of the true weight of the food, and 8 % being within ±10 %. For foods that closely resemble a geometric shape, the finger width method provides a novel and acceptably accurate method of estimating portion size. Cambridge University Press 2016-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4976119/ /pubmed/27547392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2016.22 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gibson, Alice A.
Hsu, Michelle S. H.
Rangan, Anna M.
Seimon, Radhika V.
Lee, Crystal M. Y.
Das, Arpita
Finch, Charles H.
Sainsbury, Amanda
Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids
title Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids
title_full Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids
title_fullStr Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids
title_short Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids
title_sort accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2016.22
work_keys_str_mv AT gibsonalicea accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids
AT hsumichellesh accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids
AT ranganannam accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids
AT seimonradhikav accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids
AT leecrystalmy accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids
AT dasarpita accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids
AT finchcharlesh accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids
AT sainsburyamanda accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids