Cargando…
Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids
Accurate estimation of food portion size is critical in dietary studies. Hands are potentially useful as portion size estimation aids; however, their accuracy has not been tested. The aim of the present study was to test the accuracy of a novel portion size estimation method using the width of the f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2016.22 |
_version_ | 1782446812063334400 |
---|---|
author | Gibson, Alice A. Hsu, Michelle S. H. Rangan, Anna M. Seimon, Radhika V. Lee, Crystal M. Y. Das, Arpita Finch, Charles H. Sainsbury, Amanda |
author_facet | Gibson, Alice A. Hsu, Michelle S. H. Rangan, Anna M. Seimon, Radhika V. Lee, Crystal M. Y. Das, Arpita Finch, Charles H. Sainsbury, Amanda |
author_sort | Gibson, Alice A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurate estimation of food portion size is critical in dietary studies. Hands are potentially useful as portion size estimation aids; however, their accuracy has not been tested. The aim of the present study was to test the accuracy of a novel portion size estimation method using the width of the fingers as a ‘ruler’ to measure the dimensions of foods (‘finger width method’), as well as fists and thumb or finger tips. These hand measures were also compared with household measures (cups and spoons). A total of sixty-seven participants (70 % female; age 32·7 (sd 13·7) years; BMI 23·2 (sd 3·5) kg/m(2)) attended a 1·5 h session in which they estimated the portion sizes of forty-two pre-weighed foods and liquids. Hand measurements were used in conjunction with geometric formulas to convert estimations to volumes. Volumes determined with hand and household methods were converted to estimated weights using density factors. Estimated weights were compared with true weights, and the percentage difference from the true weight was used to compare accuracy between the hand and household methods. Of geometrically shaped foods and liquids estimated with the finger width method, 80 % were within ±25 % of the true weight of the food, and 13 % were within ±10 %, in contrast to 29 % of those estimated with the household method being within ±25 % of the true weight of the food, and 8 % being within ±10 %. For foods that closely resemble a geometric shape, the finger width method provides a novel and acceptably accurate method of estimating portion size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4976119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49761192016-08-19 Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids Gibson, Alice A. Hsu, Michelle S. H. Rangan, Anna M. Seimon, Radhika V. Lee, Crystal M. Y. Das, Arpita Finch, Charles H. Sainsbury, Amanda J Nutr Sci Research Article Accurate estimation of food portion size is critical in dietary studies. Hands are potentially useful as portion size estimation aids; however, their accuracy has not been tested. The aim of the present study was to test the accuracy of a novel portion size estimation method using the width of the fingers as a ‘ruler’ to measure the dimensions of foods (‘finger width method’), as well as fists and thumb or finger tips. These hand measures were also compared with household measures (cups and spoons). A total of sixty-seven participants (70 % female; age 32·7 (sd 13·7) years; BMI 23·2 (sd 3·5) kg/m(2)) attended a 1·5 h session in which they estimated the portion sizes of forty-two pre-weighed foods and liquids. Hand measurements were used in conjunction with geometric formulas to convert estimations to volumes. Volumes determined with hand and household methods were converted to estimated weights using density factors. Estimated weights were compared with true weights, and the percentage difference from the true weight was used to compare accuracy between the hand and household methods. Of geometrically shaped foods and liquids estimated with the finger width method, 80 % were within ±25 % of the true weight of the food, and 13 % were within ±10 %, in contrast to 29 % of those estimated with the household method being within ±25 % of the true weight of the food, and 8 % being within ±10 %. For foods that closely resemble a geometric shape, the finger width method provides a novel and acceptably accurate method of estimating portion size. Cambridge University Press 2016-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4976119/ /pubmed/27547392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2016.22 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gibson, Alice A. Hsu, Michelle S. H. Rangan, Anna M. Seimon, Radhika V. Lee, Crystal M. Y. Das, Arpita Finch, Charles H. Sainsbury, Amanda Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids |
title | Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids |
title_full | Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids |
title_short | Accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids |
title_sort | accuracy of hands v. household measures as portion size estimation aids |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2016.22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gibsonalicea accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids AT hsumichellesh accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids AT ranganannam accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids AT seimonradhikav accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids AT leecrystalmy accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids AT dasarpita accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids AT finchcharlesh accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids AT sainsburyamanda accuracyofhandsvhouseholdmeasuresasportionsizeestimationaids |