Cargando…

Changes in Adolescents’ Receipt of Sex Education, 2006–2013

PURPOSE: Updated estimates of adolescents’ receipt of sex education are needed to monitor changing access to information. METHODS: Using nationally representative data from the 2006–2010 and 2011–2013 National Survey of Family Growth, we estimated changes over time in adolescents’ receipt of sex edu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindberg, Laura Duberstein, Maddow-Zimet, Isaac, Boonstra, Heather
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27032487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.02.004
_version_ 1782446880663273472
author Lindberg, Laura Duberstein
Maddow-Zimet, Isaac
Boonstra, Heather
author_facet Lindberg, Laura Duberstein
Maddow-Zimet, Isaac
Boonstra, Heather
author_sort Lindberg, Laura Duberstein
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Updated estimates of adolescents’ receipt of sex education are needed to monitor changing access to information. METHODS: Using nationally representative data from the 2006–2010 and 2011–2013 National Survey of Family Growth, we estimated changes over time in adolescents’ receipt of sex education from formal sources and from parents and differentials in these trends by adolescents’ gender, race/ethnicity, age, and place of residence. RESULTS: Between 2006–2010 and 2011–2013, there were significant declines in adolescent females’ receipt of formal instruction about birth control (70% to 60%), saying no to sex (89% to 82%), sexually transmitted disease (94% to 90%), and HIV/AIDS (89% to 86%). There was a significant decline in males’ receipt of instruction about birth control (61% to 55%). Declines were concentrated among adolescents living in nonmetropolitan areas. The proportion of adolescents talking with their parents about sex education topics did not change significantly. Twenty-one percent of females and 35% of males did not receive instruction about methods of birth control from either formal sources or a parent. CONCLUSIONS: Declines in receipt of formal sex education and low rates of parental communication may leave adolescents without instruction, particularly in nonmetropolitan areas. More effort is needed to understand this decline and to explore adolescents’ potential other sources of reproductive health information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4976485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49764852016-08-08 Changes in Adolescents’ Receipt of Sex Education, 2006–2013 Lindberg, Laura Duberstein Maddow-Zimet, Isaac Boonstra, Heather J Adolesc Health Article PURPOSE: Updated estimates of adolescents’ receipt of sex education are needed to monitor changing access to information. METHODS: Using nationally representative data from the 2006–2010 and 2011–2013 National Survey of Family Growth, we estimated changes over time in adolescents’ receipt of sex education from formal sources and from parents and differentials in these trends by adolescents’ gender, race/ethnicity, age, and place of residence. RESULTS: Between 2006–2010 and 2011–2013, there were significant declines in adolescent females’ receipt of formal instruction about birth control (70% to 60%), saying no to sex (89% to 82%), sexually transmitted disease (94% to 90%), and HIV/AIDS (89% to 86%). There was a significant decline in males’ receipt of instruction about birth control (61% to 55%). Declines were concentrated among adolescents living in nonmetropolitan areas. The proportion of adolescents talking with their parents about sex education topics did not change significantly. Twenty-one percent of females and 35% of males did not receive instruction about methods of birth control from either formal sources or a parent. CONCLUSIONS: Declines in receipt of formal sex education and low rates of parental communication may leave adolescents without instruction, particularly in nonmetropolitan areas. More effort is needed to understand this decline and to explore adolescents’ potential other sources of reproductive health information. 2016-03-29 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4976485/ /pubmed/27032487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.02.004 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lindberg, Laura Duberstein
Maddow-Zimet, Isaac
Boonstra, Heather
Changes in Adolescents’ Receipt of Sex Education, 2006–2013
title Changes in Adolescents’ Receipt of Sex Education, 2006–2013
title_full Changes in Adolescents’ Receipt of Sex Education, 2006–2013
title_fullStr Changes in Adolescents’ Receipt of Sex Education, 2006–2013
title_full_unstemmed Changes in Adolescents’ Receipt of Sex Education, 2006–2013
title_short Changes in Adolescents’ Receipt of Sex Education, 2006–2013
title_sort changes in adolescents’ receipt of sex education, 2006–2013
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27032487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.02.004
work_keys_str_mv AT lindberglauraduberstein changesinadolescentsreceiptofsexeducation20062013
AT maddowzimetisaac changesinadolescentsreceiptofsexeducation20062013
AT boonstraheather changesinadolescentsreceiptofsexeducation20062013