Cargando…

Identifying a Safe Range of Stimulation Current for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: Results from a Canine Model

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) has been widely applied during thyroid surgery. However, the safe range of stimulation intensity for IONM remains undetermined. METHODS: Total thyroidectomies were performed on twenty dogs, and their RLNs were s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Tao, Zhou, Gang, Yang, Yang, Gao, Zhi-Dong, Guo, Peng, Shen, Zhan-Long, Yang, Xiao-Dong, Xie, Qi-Wei, Ye, Ying-Jiang, Jiang, Ke-Wei, Wang, Shan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453233
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.186636
_version_ 1782446895808905216
author Li, Tao
Zhou, Gang
Yang, Yang
Gao, Zhi-Dong
Guo, Peng
Shen, Zhan-Long
Yang, Xiao-Dong
Xie, Qi-Wei
Ye, Ying-Jiang
Jiang, Ke-Wei
Wang, Shan
author_facet Li, Tao
Zhou, Gang
Yang, Yang
Gao, Zhi-Dong
Guo, Peng
Shen, Zhan-Long
Yang, Xiao-Dong
Xie, Qi-Wei
Ye, Ying-Jiang
Jiang, Ke-Wei
Wang, Shan
author_sort Li, Tao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) has been widely applied during thyroid surgery. However, the safe range of stimulation intensity for IONM remains undetermined. METHODS: Total thyroidectomies were performed on twenty dogs, and their RLNs were stimulated with a current of 5–20 mA (step-wise in 5 mA increments) for 1 min. The evoked electromyography (EMG) of vocal muscles before and after supramaximal stimulation were recorded and compared. Acute microstructural morphological changes in the RLNs were observed immediately postoperatively under an electron microscope. RESULTS: The average stimulating threshold for RLNs stimulated with 15 mA and 20 mA showed no significant changes compared to the unstimulated RLNs (15 mA group: 0.320 ± 0.123 mA vs. 0.315 ± 0.097 mA, P = 0.847; 20 mA group: 0.305 ± 0.101 mA vs. 0.300 ± 0.103 mA, P = 0.758). Similar outcomes were shown in average evoked EMG amplitude (15 mA group: 1,026 ± 268 μV vs. 1,021 ± 273 μV, P = 0.834; 20 mA group: 1,162 ± 275 μV vs. 1,200 ± 258 μV, P = 0.148). However, obvious acute microstructural morphological changes were observed in the nerves that were stimulated with 20 mA. CONCLUSIONS: A stimulation intensity less than 15 mA might be safe for IONM of the RLN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4976572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49765722016-08-25 Identifying a Safe Range of Stimulation Current for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: Results from a Canine Model Li, Tao Zhou, Gang Yang, Yang Gao, Zhi-Dong Guo, Peng Shen, Zhan-Long Yang, Xiao-Dong Xie, Qi-Wei Ye, Ying-Jiang Jiang, Ke-Wei Wang, Shan Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) has been widely applied during thyroid surgery. However, the safe range of stimulation intensity for IONM remains undetermined. METHODS: Total thyroidectomies were performed on twenty dogs, and their RLNs were stimulated with a current of 5–20 mA (step-wise in 5 mA increments) for 1 min. The evoked electromyography (EMG) of vocal muscles before and after supramaximal stimulation were recorded and compared. Acute microstructural morphological changes in the RLNs were observed immediately postoperatively under an electron microscope. RESULTS: The average stimulating threshold for RLNs stimulated with 15 mA and 20 mA showed no significant changes compared to the unstimulated RLNs (15 mA group: 0.320 ± 0.123 mA vs. 0.315 ± 0.097 mA, P = 0.847; 20 mA group: 0.305 ± 0.101 mA vs. 0.300 ± 0.103 mA, P = 0.758). Similar outcomes were shown in average evoked EMG amplitude (15 mA group: 1,026 ± 268 μV vs. 1,021 ± 273 μV, P = 0.834; 20 mA group: 1,162 ± 275 μV vs. 1,200 ± 258 μV, P = 0.148). However, obvious acute microstructural morphological changes were observed in the nerves that were stimulated with 20 mA. CONCLUSIONS: A stimulation intensity less than 15 mA might be safe for IONM of the RLN. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4976572/ /pubmed/27453233 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.186636 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Tao
Zhou, Gang
Yang, Yang
Gao, Zhi-Dong
Guo, Peng
Shen, Zhan-Long
Yang, Xiao-Dong
Xie, Qi-Wei
Ye, Ying-Jiang
Jiang, Ke-Wei
Wang, Shan
Identifying a Safe Range of Stimulation Current for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: Results from a Canine Model
title Identifying a Safe Range of Stimulation Current for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: Results from a Canine Model
title_full Identifying a Safe Range of Stimulation Current for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: Results from a Canine Model
title_fullStr Identifying a Safe Range of Stimulation Current for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: Results from a Canine Model
title_full_unstemmed Identifying a Safe Range of Stimulation Current for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: Results from a Canine Model
title_short Identifying a Safe Range of Stimulation Current for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: Results from a Canine Model
title_sort identifying a safe range of stimulation current for intraoperative neuromonitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: results from a canine model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453233
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.186636
work_keys_str_mv AT litao identifyingasaferangeofstimulationcurrentforintraoperativeneuromonitoringoftherecurrentlaryngealnerveresultsfromacaninemodel
AT zhougang identifyingasaferangeofstimulationcurrentforintraoperativeneuromonitoringoftherecurrentlaryngealnerveresultsfromacaninemodel
AT yangyang identifyingasaferangeofstimulationcurrentforintraoperativeneuromonitoringoftherecurrentlaryngealnerveresultsfromacaninemodel
AT gaozhidong identifyingasaferangeofstimulationcurrentforintraoperativeneuromonitoringoftherecurrentlaryngealnerveresultsfromacaninemodel
AT guopeng identifyingasaferangeofstimulationcurrentforintraoperativeneuromonitoringoftherecurrentlaryngealnerveresultsfromacaninemodel
AT shenzhanlong identifyingasaferangeofstimulationcurrentforintraoperativeneuromonitoringoftherecurrentlaryngealnerveresultsfromacaninemodel
AT yangxiaodong identifyingasaferangeofstimulationcurrentforintraoperativeneuromonitoringoftherecurrentlaryngealnerveresultsfromacaninemodel
AT xieqiwei identifyingasaferangeofstimulationcurrentforintraoperativeneuromonitoringoftherecurrentlaryngealnerveresultsfromacaninemodel
AT yeyingjiang identifyingasaferangeofstimulationcurrentforintraoperativeneuromonitoringoftherecurrentlaryngealnerveresultsfromacaninemodel
AT jiangkewei identifyingasaferangeofstimulationcurrentforintraoperativeneuromonitoringoftherecurrentlaryngealnerveresultsfromacaninemodel
AT wangshan identifyingasaferangeofstimulationcurrentforintraoperativeneuromonitoringoftherecurrentlaryngealnerveresultsfromacaninemodel