Cargando…
Researchers’ Intuitions About Power in Psychological Research
Many psychology studies are statistically underpowered. In part, this may be because many researchers rely on intuition, rules of thumb, and prior practice (along with practical considerations) to determine the number of subjects to test. In Study 1, we surveyed 291 published research psychologists...
Autores principales: | Bakker, Marjan, Hartgerink, Chris H. J., Wicherts, Jelte M., van der Maas, Han L. J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27354203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797616647519 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Outlier Removal and the Relation with Reporting Errors and Quality of Psychological Research
por: Bakker, Marjan, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals
por: Bakker, Marjan, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results
por: Wicherts, Jelte M., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
How do psychology researchers interpret the results of multiple replication studies?
por: van den Akker, Olmo R., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)
por: Nuijten, Michèle B., et al.
Publicado: (2015)